View in EDS

Novel Shared Decision‐Making Tool Improves Contraceptive Screening and Right Care during Pregnancy in a Military Hospital: A Quality Improvement Report.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Novel Shared Decision‐Making Tool Improves Contraceptive Screening and Right Care during Pregnancy in a Military Hospital: A Quality Improvement Report.
Authors: Guertin, Jamie, Lanuza, Kalena
Source: Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health; Jan/Feb2023, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p125-134, 10p
Abstract: Introduction: Unintended pregnancy rates in the military remain high compared with rates outside of the military in the United States (54%‐60% vs 45%‐50%, respectively). Contraceptive counseling in conjunction with shared decision‐making is recommended to improve military unintended pregnancy rates. Best counseling practices and decision aids for contraceptive counseling are unknown in military and nonmilitary populations. Pregnancy may be an opportune time to complete contraceptive counseling because of regularly scheduled prenatal visits, and counseling during pregnancy is associated with higher postpartum contraception use. A quality initiative was implemented to improve contraceptive screening and counseling during pregnancy for servicewomen and nonservicewomen in a clinic setting. Process: The initiative included 4 patient‐centered core interventions: a patient screening, a shared decision‐making tool, a right care checklist, and a team engagement plan, across 4 rapid plan‐do‐study‐act cycles. Outcomes: Contraceptive screening rates and delivery of right care improved from 37% to 79% in the pregnant patients over 90 days; 81% of patients screened positive for contraception needs; 89% of patients made a same‐day decision about their contraception plan after completing the tool; and 92% of patients had a contraception plan documented in the electronic health record by the health care provider prior to birth. Discussion: Results demonstrated that contraception screening rates and right care improved with initiative interventions for servicewomen and nonservicewomen. A novel shared decision‐making tool presented 18 contraception methods, risks and benefits, and tiered effectiveness that aided the majority of patients in a same‐day decision with high patient satisfaction. Provider counseling was also simplified without delay in clinic time. Contraceptive counseling completed with a shared decision‐making tool may benefit military and civilian populations during pregnancy. Additional research is needed to examine the best time to conduct counseling during pregnancy and the long‐term rates of contraceptive use or unplanned pregnancy following counseling events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:Introduction: Unintended pregnancy rates in the military remain high compared with rates outside of the military in the United States (54%‐60% vs 45%‐50%, respectively). Contraceptive counseling in conjunction with shared decision‐making is recommended to improve military unintended pregnancy rates. Best counseling practices and decision aids for contraceptive counseling are unknown in military and nonmilitary populations. Pregnancy may be an opportune time to complete contraceptive counseling because of regularly scheduled prenatal visits, and counseling during pregnancy is associated with higher postpartum contraception use. A quality initiative was implemented to improve contraceptive screening and counseling during pregnancy for servicewomen and nonservicewomen in a clinic setting. Process: The initiative included 4 patient‐centered core interventions: a patient screening, a shared decision‐making tool, a right care checklist, and a team engagement plan, across 4 rapid plan‐do‐study‐act cycles. Outcomes: Contraceptive screening rates and delivery of right care improved from 37% to 79% in the pregnant patients over 90 days; 81% of patients screened positive for contraception needs; 89% of patients made a same‐day decision about their contraception plan after completing the tool; and 92% of patients had a contraception plan documented in the electronic health record by the health care provider prior to birth. Discussion: Results demonstrated that contraception screening rates and right care improved with initiative interventions for servicewomen and nonservicewomen. A novel shared decision‐making tool presented 18 contraception methods, risks and benefits, and tiered effectiveness that aided the majority of patients in a same‐day decision with high patient satisfaction. Provider counseling was also simplified without delay in clinic time. Contraceptive counseling completed with a shared decision‐making tool may benefit military and civilian populations during pregnancy. Additional research is needed to examine the best time to conduct counseling during pregnancy and the long‐term rates of contraceptive use or unplanned pregnancy following counseling events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15269523
DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13403