View in EDS

Demand Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP): A Systematic Review and Classification.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Demand Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP): A Systematic Review and Classification.
Authors: Azzamouri, Alilam, Baptiste, Pierre, Dessevre, Guillaume, Pellerin, Robert
Source: Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management; 2021, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p439-456, 18p
Subject Terms: MATERIAL requirements planning, CLASSIFICATION, OPERATIONS management
Abstract: Purpose: Demand Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP) aims to deal with variability by adjusting inventory levels while maintaining, or even increasing, customer service levels. This approach bridges the push and pull approaches. Even though it first made its appearance in 2011, research in this field remains relatively limited. This paper aims to analyze the temporal evolution of the DDMRP, its context of implementation, and the research themes studied in that field to identify areas that still need to be addressed by future researchers. Design/methodology/approach: The systematic literature review approach used in this paper examines research dealing with the DDMRP published in different languages between 2011 and 2020. To date, published papers focused on performance analysis and comparison of the DDMRP with other methods. This study focuses on the DDMRP itself and its capacity to answer the different operations management functions under a broader vision (context, implementation, setting, etc.). Thus, we analyze the evolution of the method in the literature, considering different languages, and present a taxonomy of published scientific works. Then, we identify gaps that require further research. Findings: DDMRP is not sufficiently studied in the literature and the proposed tools still need to be tested. More research is required to evaluate its adaptability in different and complex environments, address its ability to cope with product variety, complex BOMs, and other methods. A proposal of new approaches to define and adjust DDMRP parameters and evaluate their sensitivity is also required to make the method more scientifically sound. Originality/value: Based on the analysis of papers published in different languages, this paper outlines the current state of the art of DDMRP, its shortcomings, and identifies further research to make DDMRP more robust from both a scientific and industrial perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management is the property of Omnia Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:Purpose: Demand Driven Material Requirements Planning (DDMRP) aims to deal with variability by adjusting inventory levels while maintaining, or even increasing, customer service levels. This approach bridges the push and pull approaches. Even though it first made its appearance in 2011, research in this field remains relatively limited. This paper aims to analyze the temporal evolution of the DDMRP, its context of implementation, and the research themes studied in that field to identify areas that still need to be addressed by future researchers. Design/methodology/approach: The systematic literature review approach used in this paper examines research dealing with the DDMRP published in different languages between 2011 and 2020. To date, published papers focused on performance analysis and comparison of the DDMRP with other methods. This study focuses on the DDMRP itself and its capacity to answer the different operations management functions under a broader vision (context, implementation, setting, etc.). Thus, we analyze the evolution of the method in the literature, considering different languages, and present a taxonomy of published scientific works. Then, we identify gaps that require further research. Findings: DDMRP is not sufficiently studied in the literature and the proposed tools still need to be tested. More research is required to evaluate its adaptability in different and complex environments, address its ability to cope with product variety, complex BOMs, and other methods. A proposal of new approaches to define and adjust DDMRP parameters and evaluate their sensitivity is also required to make the method more scientifically sound. Originality/value: Based on the analysis of papers published in different languages, this paper outlines the current state of the art of DDMRP, its shortcomings, and identifies further research to make DDMRP more robust from both a scientific and industrial perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:20138423
DOI:10.3926/jiem.3331