Structured learning of rigid‐body dynamics: A survey and unified view from a robotics perspective.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Structured learning of rigid‐body dynamics: A survey and unified view from a robotics perspective.
Authors: Geist, A. René, Trimpe, Sebastian
Source: GAMM Mitteilungen; Jun2021, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p1-34, 34p
Subject Terms: AUTOMATIC differentiation, REINFORCEMENT learning, DIFFERENTIAL operators, GAUSSIAN processes, MECHANICAL models, REGRESSION analysis, RIGID bodies
Abstract: Accurate models of mechanical system dynamics are often critical for model‐based control and reinforcement learning. Fully data‐driven dynamics models promise to ease the process of modeling and analysis, but require considerable amounts of data for training and often do not generalize well to unseen parts of the state space. Combining data‐driven modeling with prior analytical knowledge is an attractive alternative as the inclusion of structural knowledge into a regression model improves the model's data efficiency and physical integrity. In this article, we survey supervised regression models that combine rigid‐body mechanics with data‐driven modeling techniques. We analyze the different latent functions (such as kinetic energy or dissipative forces) and operators (such as differential operators and projection matrices) underlying common descriptions of rigid‐body mechanics. Based on this analysis, we provide a unified view on the combination of data‐driven regression models, such as neural networks and Gaussian processes, with analytical model priors. Furthermore, we review and discuss key techniques for designing structured models such as automatic differentiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of GAMM Mitteilungen is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Description
Abstract:Accurate models of mechanical system dynamics are often critical for model‐based control and reinforcement learning. Fully data‐driven dynamics models promise to ease the process of modeling and analysis, but require considerable amounts of data for training and often do not generalize well to unseen parts of the state space. Combining data‐driven modeling with prior analytical knowledge is an attractive alternative as the inclusion of structural knowledge into a regression model improves the model's data efficiency and physical integrity. In this article, we survey supervised regression models that combine rigid‐body mechanics with data‐driven modeling techniques. We analyze the different latent functions (such as kinetic energy or dissipative forces) and operators (such as differential operators and projection matrices) underlying common descriptions of rigid‐body mechanics. Based on this analysis, we provide a unified view on the combination of data‐driven regression models, such as neural networks and Gaussian processes, with analytical model priors. Furthermore, we review and discuss key techniques for designing structured models such as automatic differentiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09367195
DOI:10.1002/gamm.202100009