Zobraziť v EDS

Why, when and how are endodontically treated teeth restored.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Why, when and how are endodontically treated teeth restored.
Autori: Melfsen L; Zahnzentrum Schomaker and Magnucki, Bassum, Germany. levke.melfsen@web.de., Maklennan A; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. anastasia.maklennan@stud.unibe.ch., Magnucki G; Zahnzentrum Schomaker and Magnucki, Bassum, Germany. gabriel.magnucki@googlemail.com., Neumann M; Clinic for Prosthetic Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany. naumann@naumann-kiessling.de., Zitzmann N; Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. n.zitzmann@unibas.ch., Neuhaus K; Department of General Pediatric and Adolescent Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. klaus.neuhaus@unibe.ch.
Zdroj: Swiss dental journal [Swiss Dent J] 2025 Dec 05; Vol. 135 (4), pp. 1-15. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 05.
Spôsob vydávania: Journal Article
Jazyk: English
Informácie o časopise: Publisher: Schweizerische Zahnärzte-Gesellschaft Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101624119 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2296-6498 (Print) Linking ISSN: 22966498 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Swiss Dent J Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Bern : Schweizerische Zahnärzte-Gesellschaft, [2014]-
Výrazy zo slovníka MeSH: Tooth, Nonvital*/therapy , Practice Patterns, Dentists'*/statistics & numerical data , Dental Restoration, Permanent*/methods , Dental Restoration, Permanent*/statistics & numerical data, Humans ; Switzerland ; Germany ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Crowns/statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Female ; Post and Core Technique/statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Adult
Abstrakt: Post-endodontic treatment preferences can be influenced by educational, healthcare, financial, and historical factors. This study aimed to compare the post-endodontic treatment choices – particularly post and single-crown placement – of dentists in Germany and Switzerland. From August to November 2023, a questionnaire was distributed amongst 334 Swiss and 570 German dentists. A total of 50 Swiss dentists (response rate: 15.0%) and 60 German dentists (response rate: 10.5%) completed the survey. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and data presented as percentages. German dentists reported placing posts in 5–20% of endodontically treated teeth, whereas most Swiss dentists did so in less than 5%. Swiss dentists (58%) tended to place posts in teeth with 0–40% remaining tooth structure, while German dentists (60%) began at 40–70%. Regarding post-endodontic restorations, the majority of German dentists (67%) preferred single crowns, whereas most Swiss dentists (68%) favored composite-resin fillings and maintained even teeth with severely reduced coronal hard tissue. These trends were further supported by responses to various clinical case scenarios.
References: 1. Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, Berman LH. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. 10th ed. St. Lou-is, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.
2. Davies A, Foschi F, Patel S. Endodontology at a glance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2018. 103 p. (At a glance series).
3. Mannocci F, Bhuva B, Roig M, Zarow M, Bitter K. European Society of Endodontology position statement: The restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2021;54(11):1974–81.
4. Naumann M, Metzdorf G, Fokkinga W, Watzke R, Sterzenbach G, Bayne S, et al. In-fluence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post‐endodontic restorations: a structured review. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36(4):299–312.
5. Sorensen J, Berge H, Edelhoff D. Selection criteria for post and core materials in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Proc Conf Sci Crit Sel Mater Tech Clin Dent. 2001;15:67-84.
6. Balkenhol M, Wöstmann B, Rein C, Ferger P. Sur-vival time of cast post and cores: A 10-year retro-spective study. J Dent. 2007;35(1):50–58.
7. Bateli M, Kern M, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR, Att W. A retrospective evaluation of teeth restored with zirconia ceramic posts: 10-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1181–1187.
8. Bruhnke M, Wierichs RJ, Von Stein-Lausnitz M, Meyer-Lückel H, Beuer F, Naumann M, et al. Long-term survival of adhesively luted post-endodontic restorations. J Endod. 2022;48(5):606–613.
9. Doshi, Krisha, Sharma S. Clinical practice guidelines for choice of post-endodontic restorations. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2021;28:2875–2879.
10. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creu-gers NHJ. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on post-and-cores and covering crowns. J Dent. 2007;35(10):778–86.
11. Robbins JW. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. Dent Clin N Am. 2002;46(2):367–384.
12. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature re-view. J Endod. 2012;38(1):11–9.
13. Naumann M, Neuhaus KW, Kölpin M, Seemann R. Why, when, and how general prac-titioners re-store endodontically treated teeth: a representa-tive survey in Germany. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(2):253–259.
14. Eckerbom M, Dr O, Magnusson T, Dr O. Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Survey of Current Opinions Among Board-Certified Prosthodontists and General Dental Prac-titioners in Sweden. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(3):245–249.
15. Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH. A Survey of Current Practices among General Dental Practitioners in Manchester in 2002. Prim Dent Care. 2003;10(3):87–92.
16. Naumann M, Kiessling S, Seemann R. Treatment concepts for restoration of endo-dontically trea-ted teeth: A nationwide survey of dentists in Germany. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(5):332–328.
17. Kon M, Zitzmann NU, Weiger R, Krastl G. Posten-dodontic restoration: a survey among dentists in Switzerland. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123:1076–1088.
18. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Festzuschuss-Richtlinien. 2024. B1.17.01.2025 https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-3701/FZ-RL_2024-11-21_iK-2025-01-01.pdf (ac-cessed 22.07.2025).
19. Ferrari M, Pontoriero DIK, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Car-boncini F. Restorative difficulty evaluation system of endodontically treated teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):65–80.
20. Naumann M, Schmitter M, Krastl G. Postendodon-tic restoration: endodontic post-and-core or no post at all? J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(1):19–24.
21. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, Vaudt J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Neumann K, et al. Random-ized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preli-minary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod. 2009;35(11):1477–1482.
22. Maklennan A, Roccuzzo A, Kramer E, G Campus, Naumann M, Meyer-Lueckel H, et al. Long-term success and survival of post-endodontic restora-tions without posts after up to 18 years: A prac-tice-based study. J Dent 2025. 154:105569.
23. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kießling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber‐reinforced composite post restorations: a prospective obser-vational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;113(6):519–524.
24. Naumann M, Reich S, Nothdurft FP, Beuer F, Schirrmeister JF, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fiber post restoration over 5 years. Am J Dent. 2008;21(4):267–272.
25. Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P. Survivial of two post systems-five-year re-sults of a ran-domized clinical trial. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(10):843–850.
26. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structur-ally compro-mised teeth. Int J Prosthodont; 2004;17:369-376.
27. Bundesrat. Verordnung zur Neuregelung der zahnärztlichen Ausbildung. 2019.
28. Cloet E, Debels E, Neart I. Controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fiber com-posite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores fot the resto-ration of endodontically treat-ed teeth: a 5 year follow up study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;(30):71–79.
29. Sarkis-Onofre R, Jacinto RC, Boscato. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: a randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent. 2014;(42):582–587.
30. Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts—clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized con-trolled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod. 2012;38(12):1557–1563.
31. Wang X, Shu X, Zhang Y, Yang B, Joan Y, Zhao K. Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restor-ing severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(1):8–20.
32. Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, Krastl G. “Ferrule Comes First. Post Is Second!” Fake News and Alternative Facts? A Systematic Review. J Endod. 2018;44(2):212–219.
33. Athithan P, Rossi-Fedele G, Ibrahim A. Current concepts for restoring root canal treated teeth: A survey of Australian and New Zealand dentists. NZ Dent J. 2024;20:119–126.
34. Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, Bitter K, Man-nocci F. The restoration of root filled teeth: a re-view of the clinical literature. Int Endod J. 2021;54(4):509–535.
35. De Kuijper MCFM, Cune MS, Özcan M, Gresnigt MMM. Clinical performance of direct composite resin versus indirect restorations on endodonti-cally treated posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(3):295–306.
36. Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns ver-sus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Oral Health Group, editor. Cochrane Da-tabase Syst Rev 2015 (9): Cd009109.
37. Da Veiga AMA, Cunha AC, Ferreira DMTP, Da Silva Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, et al. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;54:1–12.
38. Swiss Society of Reconstructive Dentistry SSRD. Rehabilitation von Geburtsgebrechen nach dem 20. Lebensjahr. SSO – Scientific Clinical Topics. Swiss Dent J. 2024;5:75–76.
39. Zitzmann N. Point of Care: When restoring the teeth of partially edentulous patients with remov-able partial dentures, do you consider placing im-plants to enhance the retention and stability of the prosthesis? J Canad Dent Assoc. 2005;71:551–552.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: e-survey; endodontics; post-endodontic treatment; root-canal post; treatment decision
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20251205 Date Completed: 20251205 Latest Revision: 20251205
Update Code: 20251205
DOI: 10.61872/sdj-2025-04-01
PMID: 41347313
Databáza: MEDLINE
Popis
Abstrakt:Post-endodontic treatment preferences can be influenced by educational, healthcare, financial, and historical factors. This study aimed to compare the post-endodontic treatment choices – particularly post and single-crown placement – of dentists in Germany and Switzerland. From August to November 2023, a questionnaire was distributed amongst 334 Swiss and 570 German dentists. A total of 50 Swiss dentists (response rate: 15.0%) and 60 German dentists (response rate: 10.5%) completed the survey. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and data presented as percentages. German dentists reported placing posts in 5–20% of endodontically treated teeth, whereas most Swiss dentists did so in less than 5%. Swiss dentists (58%) tended to place posts in teeth with 0–40% remaining tooth structure, while German dentists (60%) began at 40–70%. Regarding post-endodontic restorations, the majority of German dentists (67%) preferred single crowns, whereas most Swiss dentists (68%) favored composite-resin fillings and maintained even teeth with severely reduced coronal hard tissue. These trends were further supported by responses to various clinical case scenarios.
ISSN:2296-6498
DOI:10.61872/sdj-2025-04-01