Precarious employment and gender-based violence against migrant women: A scoping review mapping the intersections.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Precarious employment and gender-based violence against migrant women: A scoping review mapping the intersections.
Autoren: Chadambuka C; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto., Namyalo PK; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto., Raghunauth R; Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto., Arora N; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University., Kouyoumdjian F; Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University., Essue BM; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto.
Quelle: PloS one [PLoS One] 2025 Dec 01; Vol. 20 (12), pp. e0337690. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Dec 01 (Print Publication: 2025).
Publikationsart: Journal Article; Scoping Review
Sprache: English
Info zur Zeitschrift: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
MeSH-Schlagworte: Transients and Migrants*/psychology , Transients and Migrants*/statistics & numerical data , Employment* , Gender-Based Violence*/psychology , Gender-Based Violence*/statistics & numerical data, Humans ; Female ; Job Security
Abstract: The risk of gender-based violence (GBV) against migrant women is largely exacerbated by precarious employment opportunities available to them as they go through the resettlement process. Despite the risk that the connection of precarious employment and GBV pose to migrant women's health and wellbeing, critical gaps exist in literature. Our scoping review sought to identify and synthesize evidence on the interconnectedness of GBV and precarious employment among migrant women. Six electronic databases were searched for empirical literature and two reviewers independently conducted title/abstract and full text screening of studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis was guided by the intersectionality theory and the Feminist Political Economy framework. 50 articles met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Our findings reveal that precarious employment plays both a catalytic and consequential role in GBV. Findings highlighted how post-migration shifts in gender roles, schedule unpredictability leading to work-life imbalance, and debt bondage trap migrant women in cycles of exploitation and abuse. Few studies highlighted how human trafficking is intertwined with precarious labor markets, where the exploitation and abuse of migrant women mirror the characteristics of human trafficking. This review underscores the urgent need for integrated policy responses that are not only focused on individual supports but also address the structural drivers or labor precarity and protect migrant women from GBV and human trafficking. By applying an intersectional lens, policies and intervention programs can tackle systemic oppression across economic, and social systems essential in reducing exploitation and abuse to advance migrant women's wellbeing.
(Copyright: © 2025 Chadambuka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
References: Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Jan;17(1):59-67. (PMID: 21341898)
Int J Health Serv. 2018 Jan;48(1):106-127. (PMID: 28906167)
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. (PMID: 22829486)
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203998. (PMID: 30235255)
Violence Against Women. 2012 Dec;18(12):1345-67. (PMID: 23419274)
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):235-247. (PMID: 31901944)
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Feb;9(1):135-145. (PMID: 33403650)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):. (PMID: 34769737)
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Nov;37(21-22):NP21189-NP21216. (PMID: 34865540)
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Dec 10;13:119. (PMID: 25492385)
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Jan;19(1):58-75. (PMID: 26951190)
Work. 2017;56(1):55-65. (PMID: 28128780)
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Dec;5(4):371-85. (PMID: 26052958)
J Migr Health. 2022 Dec 05;7:100142. (PMID: 36568828)
Violence Against Women. 2024 Sep;30(11):2828-2852. (PMID: 36950730)
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:229-53. (PMID: 24641559)
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):135. (PMID: 30089494)
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):40-9. (PMID: 19040784)
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Feb;48(2):577-588. (PMID: 30291600)
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313215. (PMID: 39715235)
Gac Sanit. 2020 Sep - Oct;34(5):493-499. (PMID: 30594331)
West J Nurs Res. 2015 Feb;37(2):180-96. (PMID: 24658287)
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):1469. (PMID: 35915413)
Violence Against Women. 2024 Aug;30(10):2482-2510. (PMID: 36913733)
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Oct;22(4):717-727. (PMID: 31615345)
Global Health. 2017 Sep 11;13(1):71. (PMID: 28893298)
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):224-240. (PMID: 32662354)
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1364-1380. (PMID: 33705248)
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;48(2):225-246. (PMID: 37715892)
Lancet. 2022 Dec 10;400(10368):2125-2136. (PMID: 36502850)
PLoS One. 2025 Dec 1;20(12):e0337690. (PMID: 41325405)
Front Sociol. 2020 Nov 06;5:588279. (PMID: 33869516)
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2011 Jul-Sep;34(3):E29-51. (PMID: 21822068)
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;55(6):557-68. (PMID: 19592428)
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Jul;50(5):619-28. (PMID: 24370752)
Global Health. 2022 Jun 28;18(1):68. (PMID: 35765002)
Violence Against Women. 2025 Mar 18;:10778012251329263. (PMID: 40101280)
J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Jan;45:1-6. (PMID: 27846452)
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Nov;31(19):3236-3256. (PMID: 25985975)
J Bus Ethics. 2023 Jun 2;:1-16. (PMID: 37359798)
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. (PMID: 30178033)
PLoS One. 2024 May 3;19(5):e0300388. (PMID: 38701061)
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Oct;21(4):788-810. (PMID: 30176768)
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Dec;17(6):1834-9. (PMID: 24514945)
Front Sociol. 2023 Jan 18;7:1091957. (PMID: 36741584)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20251201 Date Completed: 20251201 Latest Revision: 20251204
Update Code: 20251204
PubMed Central ID: PMC12668559
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337690
PMID: 41325405
Datenbank: MEDLINE
Beschreibung
Abstract:The risk of gender-based violence (GBV) against migrant women is largely exacerbated by precarious employment opportunities available to them as they go through the resettlement process. Despite the risk that the connection of precarious employment and GBV pose to migrant women's health and wellbeing, critical gaps exist in literature. Our scoping review sought to identify and synthesize evidence on the interconnectedness of GBV and precarious employment among migrant women. Six electronic databases were searched for empirical literature and two reviewers independently conducted title/abstract and full text screening of studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis was guided by the intersectionality theory and the Feminist Political Economy framework. 50 articles met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Our findings reveal that precarious employment plays both a catalytic and consequential role in GBV. Findings highlighted how post-migration shifts in gender roles, schedule unpredictability leading to work-life imbalance, and debt bondage trap migrant women in cycles of exploitation and abuse. Few studies highlighted how human trafficking is intertwined with precarious labor markets, where the exploitation and abuse of migrant women mirror the characteristics of human trafficking. This review underscores the urgent need for integrated policy responses that are not only focused on individual supports but also address the structural drivers or labor precarity and protect migrant women from GBV and human trafficking. By applying an intersectional lens, policies and intervention programs can tackle systemic oppression across economic, and social systems essential in reducing exploitation and abuse to advance migrant women's wellbeing.<br /> (Copyright: © 2025 Chadambuka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
ISSN:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0337690