View in EDS

Shifting Priorities: How Amendments in Forestry Law Impact Resource Management, the Case of Türkiye.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Shifting Priorities: How Amendments in Forestry Law Impact Resource Management, the Case of Türkiye.
Authors:	Caliskan H; Independent Researcher, Ankara, Türkiye. hcaliskanphd@gmail.com., Birben U; Faculty of Forestry, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Türkiye., Ozden S; Independent Researcher, Lohmar, Germany.
Source:	Environmental management [Environ Manage] 2025 Nov 26; Vol. 76 (1), pp. 13. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Nov 26.
Publication Type:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Journal Info:	Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7703893 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-1009 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0364152X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Manage Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s):	Publication: New York Ny : Springer Verlag Original Publication: New York, Springer-Verlag.
MeSH Terms:	Forestry/legislation & jurisprudence , Forestry/economics , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Forests, Environmental Policy/legislation & jurisprudence
Abstract:	Competing Interests: Compliance with Ethical Standards. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests. In Türkiye, where nearly all forests are publicly owned, the government exercises substantial authority over forest management and utilization. This study examines how legislative and regulatory changes in forestry have shaped local outcomes, focusing on the tension between economic priorities and ecological sustainability. Methodologically, the study combines Hamilton's institutional approach, highlighting the role of legal frameworks, administrative routines, and authority structures in shaping governance, with Foucault's concept of governmentality, which emphasizes how power is exercised through norms, regulations, and technical knowledge. This dual framework is applied through a qualitative document analysis of forestry laws, development plans, and policy papers. The findings show that while official statistics suggest an overall expansion of forest area, regional patterns reveal increasing pressures on natural forests to supply industrial raw materials, and growing reliance on non-forestry permits within forest boundaries. These outcomes demonstrate that governance mechanisms and legislative amendments have systematically prioritized economic utilization. The study concludes that the Turkish case illustrates how institutionalized governance choices, mediated through law and regulation, may simultaneously enable resource mobilization and accelerate long-term forest degradation. These insights emphasize the need for policy frameworks that better balance economic development with ecological preservation, offering lessons for sustainable forest governance globally. (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
References:	Akduman S, Aktepe R, Aldemir A, Özçelikçi E, Alam B, Sahmaran M (2024) Opportunities and challenges in constructing a demountable precast building using C&D waste-based geopolymer concrete: a case study in Türkiye. J Clean Prod 434: 139976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139976. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139976) Akkaya M, Ok K, Koç M, Akseki İ, Aktaş ME (2021) Türkiye’de ithal odun hammaddesiyle ilişkili orman endüstri işletmelerinin genel yapısı. Turk J Sci 5(1):57–77. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.828264. (PMID: 10.32328/turkjforsci.828264) Asan Ü (1998) Administration periods and objective diameters in functional planning. J Fac For Istanb Univ 48(1):23–40. Atmış E (2018) A critical review of the (potentially) negative impacts of current protected area policies on the nature conservation of forests in Turkey. Land Use Policy 70:675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.054. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.054) Atmış E, Erdönmez C, özkazanç NK (2022) Türkiye’de Ormansızlaşma. Türkiye Ormancılığı 2022. In: Atmış E (ed) Türkiye’de ormansızlaşma ve ormanların bozulması. Türkiye Ormancılar Derneği Yayını, Ankara. Atmış E, Günşen HB (2016) Political parties and forestry relations in Turkey’s general elections in 2015. J Fac For Istanb Univ 66(2):587–599. https://doi.org/10.17099/jffiu.87085. Atmış E, Günşen HB (2017) Analysis of the struggles against forest destruction in Turkey. In: Uydacı M (ed) Turkish Studies from Different Perspectives. Athens Institute for Education and Research, Athens, Greece, pp 315–336. Atmış E, Yıldız D, Erdönmez C (2024) A different dimension in deforestation and forest degradation: non-forestry uses of forests in Turkey. Land Use Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107086. Ayanoğlu S (1996) Türk orman rejimine eleştirisel bir yaklaşım. Derg Fak Orman İstanb Üniv 46(2):99–114. Başkent EZ (2022) Reflections of stakeholders on the forest resources governance with power analysis in Turkey. Land Use Policy 115: 106035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106035. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106035) Başkent EZ, Kašpar J (2023) Exploring the effects of various rotation lengths on the ecosystem services within a multiple-use management framework. For Ecol Manag 538: 120974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120974. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120974) Başkent EZ, Terzioğlu S, Başkaya Ş (2008) Developing and implementing multiple-use forest management planning in Turkey. Environ Manag 42:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9106-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00267-008-9106-6) Baykara E, Eşen D (2024) Post-fire natural regeneration and early growth of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia) seedlings in Western Türkiye. Forestist 75:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2024.24033. (PMID: 10.5152/forestist.2024.24033) Birben Ü (2019) State ownership of forests from different angles: policy, economics, and law. Environ Monit Assess 191(8):502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7641-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s10661-019-7641-7) Birben Ü, Gençay G (2018) Public interest versus forests. Cerne 24(4):360–368. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201824042570. (PMID: 10.1590/01047760201824042570) Birben Ü (2008) Türkiye’de 1937 yılından sonra ormancılık mevzuatında yaşanan gelişmeler ve toplumsal yaşamla etkileşimler. J For Fac Istanbul Univ 58(1):1–16. Bonari G, Chytrý K, Çoban S, Chytrý M (2020) Natural forests of Pinus pinea in western Turkey: a priority for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 29(14):3877–3898. (PMID: 10.1007/s10531-020-02052-z) Bouriaud L, Schmithüsen F (2005) Allocation of property rights on forests through ownership reform and forest policies in Central and Eastern European countries. Schweiz Z For 156(8):297–305. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005960787. (PMID: 10.3929/ethz-a-005960787) Bromley DW (1985) Resources and economic development: an institutionalist perspective. J Econ Issues 19(3):779–796. Brown P (1996) Global warming. Blanford, London. Brukas V, Felton A, Lindbladh M, Sallnäs O (2013) Linking forest management, policy and biodiversity indicators–a comparison of Lithuania and Southern Sweden. For Ecol Manag 291:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.034. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.034) Çağlar Y (2014) Hukuksal Kıskaçtaki Ormanlar ve Ormancılık. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları, Ankara. Çalışkan H, Özden S (2021) A forest policy evaluation of meeting the raw material demand in forest products industry from natural forests. Anatol J Res 7(2):152–160. https://doi.org/10.53516/ajfr.993908. (PMID: 10.53516/ajfr.993908) Çalışkan H, Göl C (2022) The effects of experienced demographic change on land use type/land cover in the Republican period of Turkey. Anatol J Res 8(1):100–112. https://doi.org/10.53516/ajfr.1075531. (PMID: 10.53516/ajfr.1075531) Çalışkan H, Özden S (2024) Forest management approaches in Türkiye: understanding the past, evolving the future. Int For Rev 26(3):261–275. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554824839071661. (PMID: 10.1505/146554824839071661) Cengiz S, Atmış E, Görmüş S (2019) The impact of economic growth oriented development policies on landscape changes in Istanbul Province in Turkey. Land Use Policy 87:104086. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104086) Chimhowu AO, Hulme D, Munro LT (2019) The ‘New’national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships. World Dev 120:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.013) Çizgen S, Tuttu G, Ursavaş S (2018) Harvest amounts and economic value of the acorn in Turkey. Anatol J Res 4(2):109–113. Clancy L, Poushter J, Hernandez Ramores S (2024) Turks lean negative on Erdoğan, give national government mixed ratings. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/10/16/turks-lean-negative-on-erdogan-give-national-government-mixed-ratings/. Coşkun AA (1999) Türkiye’de ormanlardan yararlanmanın yasal esasları. Derg Orman Fak İstanb Üniv 49(1):83–110. Coşkun AK, Türker MF, ve Öztürk A (2015) Forestry in the election bulletins and government programs of the parties come to power alone in Turkey. Artvin Coruh Univ J For Fac 16(1):72–88. https://doi.org/10.17474/acuofd.21491. (PMID: 10.17474/acuofd.21491) Davis C, Williams L, Lupberger S, Daviet F (2013) Assessing forest governance: the governance of forests initiative indicator framework. World Resources Institute, Washington. Dindaroğlu T, Boran B, Babur E (2023) Investigation of the long-term changes in the soil properties of the areas taken out of the forest: Adana, Karaisali Case. Turk J Sci 7(2):284–302. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1297012. (PMID: 10.32328/turkjforsci.1297012) Drasospolino S, Zauhar S, Santoso B, Hermawan (2023) The forest management policy and its influence in forest area utilization and empowering forest communities in Yogyakarta. Land Use Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106539. Duru B (2015) Natural and cultural assets during AK Party Period (AKP Döneminde Doğal ve Kültürel Varlıklar). Bianet Newspaper http://bianet.org/biamag/kent/164895-akp-doneminde-dogal-ve-kulturel-varliklar (in Turkish). Erder S, Incioglu N (2013) 2004 Sonrasi Gelismeler: Yerel Siyaset Ikinci Planda (Developments after 2004: local politics in second plan). In: Türkiye’de Yerel Politikanın Yükselişi: Istanbul Buyuksehir Belediyesi Ornegi. Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi, Istanbul (in Turkish). Erdönmez C, Yurdakul Erol S (2021) A milestone in terms of historical development of the national forestry policy in Turkey: Law No. 1255. J Bartin Fac For 23(1):182–201. https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.805525. (PMID: 10.24011/barofd.805525) Erdönmez C, Atmış E, ve Özden S (2010) Türkiye’de ormancılık politikası. In: Akesen A, Ekizoğlu A (eds) Ormancılık Politikası. Türkiye Ormancılar Derneği Yayını, Ankara, pp 101–146. FAT (2022) Türkiye Ormancılığı 2022. In: Atmış E (ed) Türkiye’de ormansızlaşma ve ormanların bozulması. Foresters’ Association of Türkiye, Ankara. Foucault M (1991) The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. GDF (2017) Ekosistem tabanlı fonksiyonel orman amenajman planlarının düzenlenmesine ait usül ve esaslar ile ilgili 299 sayılı tebliğ. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/mevzuat/tebligler . Accessed 31 October 2023. GDF (2019) 310 sayılı Oduna Dayalı Orman Ürünlerinin Üretim İşlerine Ait Tebliğ. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/mevzuat/tebligler . Accessed 31 October 2023. GDF (2020) Sürdürülebilir Orman yönetimi Kriter ve Göstergeleri 2019 Türkiye Raporu. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/kitaplik/ulusal-duzey-surdurulebilir-orman-yonetimi . Accessed 31 October 2023. GDF (2021) Türkiye Orman Varlığı 2020. General Directorate of Forest, Ankara. GDF (2022) Official statistics. General Directorate of Forestry of Turkey. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/resmi-istatistikler . Accessed 17 Oct 2023. Geymen A, Baz İ (2008) Monitoring urban growth and detecting land-cover changes on the Istanbul metropolitan area. Environ Monit Assess 136:449–459. (PMID: 10.1007/s10661-007-9699-x) Giritlioglu P (2020) The issue of the areas that are removed outside the forest boundaries from the planning perspective: İstanbul case. Planning https://doi.org/10.14744/planlama.2020.93695. Gül İ (2014) Danıştay Kararlarında ‘Kamu Yararı’ Kavramı. Ankara Barosu Derg 2(Mart 2014):533–552. Gülersoy NZ, Gökmen EY (2014) İstanbul ve Tartışmalı Üç Proje: 3. Köprü -3. Havalimanı - Kanal Istanbul (Istanbul and three controversial Projects: 3rd Bridge –3rd Airport – Kanal Istanbul). In: Gülersoy NZ, Mutlu OE, Gökmen EY (eds) Three Major Projects Will Affect the Future of Istanbul-3rd Bridge, 3rd Airport and Kanal Istanbul TEMA Foundation Expert Opinions. TEMA Foundation, Istanbul (in Turkish). Güneş Y, Coşkun AA (2005) Legal structure of public participation in environmental issues in Turkey. J Environ Assess Policy 7(03):543–568. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333205002122. (PMID: 10.1142/S1464333205002122) Günşen HB, Atmış E (2019) Analysis of forest change and deforestation in Turkey. Int For Rev 21(2):182–194. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819826606577. (PMID: 10.1505/146554819826606577) Hagar JC (2007) Wildlife species associated with non-coniferous vegetation in Pacific Northwest conifer forests: a review. For Ecol Manag 246(1):108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.054. (PMID: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.054) Hamilton WH (1919) The institutional approach to economic theory. Am Econ Rev 9(1), 309–318. Ilie M (2013) The juridical protection of the forest in Romania. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 81:171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.408. (PMID: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.408) Karaman O (2013) Urban renewal in Istanbul: reconfigured spaces, robotic lives. Int J Urban Reg Res 37(2):715–733. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01163.x) Kavgacı A, Tavşanoğlu Ç (2010) Post-fire vegetation dynamics in mediterranean type ecosystems. Derg Fak Orman Süleyman Demirel Üniv A:149–166. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.57284. (PMID: 10.18182/tjf.57284) Kavgacı A, Örtel E, Torres I, Safford H (2016) Early postfire vegetation recovery of Pinus brutia forests: effects of fire severity, prefire stand age, and aspect. Turk J Agric For 40:723–736. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1601-21. (PMID: 10.3906/tar-1601-21) Kömürlü M, Atmış E, Alan M, Ondaral S (2022) Aşırı odun üretimi. Türkiye Ormancılığı 2022. In: Atmış E (ed) Türkiye’de ormansızlaşma ve ormanların bozulması. Türkiye Ormancılar Derneği Yayını, Ankara. Korsnes M (2014) Fragmentation, centralisation and policy learning: an example from China’s wind industry. J Curr Chin Aff 43(3):175–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261404300308. (PMID: 10.1177/186810261404300308) Küçüker DM (2019) Analyzing the effects of various forest management strategies and carbon prices on carbon dynamics in western Turkey. J Environ Manag 249: 109356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109356. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109356) Lindahl KB, Sténs A, Sandström C, Johansson J, Lidskog R, Ranius T, Roberge JM (2017) The Swedish forestry model: more of everything?. For Policy Econ 77:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012) Madsen OJ (2014) Governmentality. In: Teo T (ed) Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_126. MAF (2024) Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Official statistics of protected areas. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/DKMP/Menu/18/ . Accessed 25 July 2025. Marques M, Juerges N, Borges JG (2020) Appraisal framework for actor interest and power analysis in forest management-Insights from Northern Portugal. For Policy Econ 111: 102049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102049. (PMID: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102049) Mevzuat (1956) Orman Kanunu. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.3.6831.pdf . Accessed 31 October 2023. Mevzuat (1982) Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.2709.pdf . Accessed 31 October 2023. Nelson RH (2000) Rethinking scientific management brand-new alternatives for a century-old agency. In: Sedjo RA (ed) A vision for the U.S. Forest Service, goals for its next century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 59. Ok K, Uruşak U, Kanadoğlu OK (2018) 7139 Sayılı Kanun Kapsamında Ormancılık ve Su Tahsisi ile Arazi Toplulaştırılmasının Anayasallığı. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 31:133–215. Olgun H, Tolunay A (2018) Assessment of opinions relevant to the legal regulations of forest areas in the allocation of non-forestry uses and permits. J Bartin Fac For 20(2):287–295. https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.328553. (PMID: 10.24011/barofd.328553) Özden S, Birben Ü (2012) Ottoman forestry: socio-economic aspect and its influence today. Ciênc Rural 42(3):459–466. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012000300012. (PMID: 10.1590/S0103-84782012000300012) Özdönmez M, İstanbullu T, Akesen A, Ve Ekizoğlu A. (1996) Ormancılık Politikası. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayını, İstanbul. Özkaynak B, Aydιn Cİ, Ertör-Akyazι P, Ertör I (2015) The Gezi Park resistance from an environmental justice and social metabolism perspective. Cap Nat Soc 26:99–114. Polatoğlu MG (2021) Forest policy implemented in Turkey, in the period of 1923-1945. Dokuz Eylül Üniv Sos Bilimler Enst Derg 23(3):971–999. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.772699. (PMID: 10.16953/deusosbil.772699) Şahin A, Çağlayan İ, Büyük H, Karademir H, Aksu A, Şahin H (2022) Centennial evaluation of technical and structural changes in the first forest planning unit of Turkey. Turk J For Res 9(1):12–34. https://doi.org/10.17568/ogmoad.977763. (PMID: 10.17568/ogmoad.977763) Saraç O (2019) Kamu Yararı Kavramı. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı. https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2019/09/O.-SARAC-2.pdf . Accessed 21 February 2024. SBB (1996) Seventh Five Year Development Plan (1996–2000). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Seventh_Five_Year_Development_Plan_1996-2000.pdf . Accessed 1 November 2023. SBB (2014) The Tenth Development Plan (2014−2018). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/The_Tenth_Development_Plan_2014-2018.pdf . Accessed 1 November 2023. SBB (2019) On birinci kalkınma planı. 2019-2023. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf . Accessed 1 November 2023. SBB (2023) On ikinci kalkınma planı. 2024-2028. https://onikinciplan.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/On-Ikinci-Kalkinma-Plani_2024-2028.pdf . Accessed 20 November 2023. SBB (2024) Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı Kalkınma Planları. 2024-2028. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/kalkinma-planlari/ . Accessed 20 November 2023. Schier F, Morland C, Janzen N, Weimar H (2018) Impacts of changing coniferous and non-coniferous wood supply on forest product markets: a German scenario case study. Eur J Res 137(3):279–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1111-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s10342-018-1111-6) Siry JP, Cubbage FW, Newman DH (eds) (2009) Global forest ownership: implications for forest production, management, and protection. Buenos Aires: XIII World Forestry Congress, FAO. Sundar N (2011) In: Sivaramakrishnan K, Gupta A (ed) The state in India after liberalization: interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, USA, pp 175–193. Tavşanoglu C, Gürkan B (2009) Post-fire regeneration of a Pinus brutia (Pinaceae) forest in Marmaris National Park, Turkey. Int J Bot 5(1):107–111. (PMID: 10.3923/ijb.2009.107.111) Tavşanoğlu Ç, Gürkan B (2014) Long-term post-fire dynamics of co-occurring woody species in Pinus brutia forests: the role of regeneration mode. Plant Ecol 215(3):355–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0306-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s11258-014-0306-2) Tombaloğlu N (2014) Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Kamu Yararı Kavramı. İnönü Üniv Hukuk Fak Derg 5(1):353–388. https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.239988. Toulmin C (2009) Securing land and property rights in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of local institutions. Land use policy 26(1):10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.07.006) Turan M (2018) Türkiye’nin yeni yönetim düzeni: Cumhurbaşkanlığı hükümet sistemi. Soc Sci Res J 7(3):42–91. Üstüner Y (2023) Reconstruction of Turkish Public Administration under the new presidential government system. In: Public administration in the Middle East and North Africa. Routledge, New York. pp 20–33. Wang H (2022) Essays in game theory and forest economics. Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Wiebe KD, Meinzen-Dick R (1998) Property rights as policy tools for sustainable development. Land Use Policy 15(3):203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(98)00014-3. (PMID: 10.1016/S0264-8377(98)00014-3) Yıldırım HT, Candan Z, Korkut S (2014) Wood-based panels industry in Turkey: Future raw material challenges and suggestions. Maderas Cienc tecnol 16(2):175–186. Yılmaz A (2017) Cytotaxonomic study of Quercus L. species from section Quercus in Turkey. Caryologia 70(2):141–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2017.1299977. (PMID: 10.1080/00087114.2017.1299977)
Contributed Indexing:	Keywords: Forest policy; Forests’ economic contribution; Natural resources management.; Public authority
Entry Date(s):	Date Created: 20251126 Date Completed: 20251126 Latest Revision: 20251126
Update Code:	20251126
DOI:	10.1007/s00267-025-02308-w
PMID:	41296072
Database:	MEDLINE

Full Text Finder

Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science

Description
Abstract:	Competing Interests: Compliance with Ethical Standards. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.<br />In Türkiye, where nearly all forests are publicly owned, the government exercises substantial authority over forest management and utilization. This study examines how legislative and regulatory changes in forestry have shaped local outcomes, focusing on the tension between economic priorities and ecological sustainability. Methodologically, the study combines Hamilton's institutional approach, highlighting the role of legal frameworks, administrative routines, and authority structures in shaping governance, with Foucault's concept of governmentality, which emphasizes how power is exercised through norms, regulations, and technical knowledge. This dual framework is applied through a qualitative document analysis of forestry laws, development plans, and policy papers. The findings show that while official statistics suggest an overall expansion of forest area, regional patterns reveal increasing pressures on natural forests to supply industrial raw materials, and growing reliance on non-forestry permits within forest boundaries. These outcomes demonstrate that governance mechanisms and legislative amendments have systematically prioritized economic utilization. The study concludes that the Turkish case illustrates how institutionalized governance choices, mediated through law and regulation, may simultaneously enable resource mobilization and accelerate long-term forest degradation. These insights emphasize the need for policy frameworks that better balance economic development with ecological preservation, offering lessons for sustainable forest governance globally.<br /> (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
ISSN:	1432-1009
DOI:	10.1007/s00267-025-02308-w