Development and validity of an educational booklet on LGBT+ health in Primary Health Care.
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Development and validity of an educational booklet on LGBT+ health in Primary Health Care. |
|---|---|
| Autori: | West MGLN; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil., Araújo EC; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil., Vilar CMLN; Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Secretaria de Saúde. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil., Batista MAL; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil., Pereira DMR; Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. |
| Zdroj: | Revista brasileira de enfermagem [Rev Bras Enferm] 2025 Nov 21; Vol. 78 (suppl 2), pp. e20240433. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Nov 21 (Print Publication: 2025). |
| Spôsob vydávania: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English; Portuguese |
| Informácie o časopise: | Publisher: Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem Country of Publication: Brazil NLM ID: 7910105 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1984-0446 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00347167 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Rev Bras Enferm Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: Brasilia : Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem Original Publication: Brasilia [s.n.] |
| Výrazy zo slovníka MeSH: | Sexual and Gender Minorities*/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities*/statistics & numerical data , Pamphlets*, Humans ; Primary Health Care/standards ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Reproducibility of Results ; Middle Aged ; Health Personnel/education ; Brazil |
| Abstrakt: | Objectives: to develop and validate a digital educational booklet on LGBT+ health for professionals in Primary Health Care. Methods: a methodological study, prepared through bibliographic survey and analysis of the sociodemographic, educational and cultural profile of Primary Health Care professionals, content, appearance and semantics validity. For validity, the Content Validity Index equal to or greater than 0.80, binomial test and Suitability Assessment of Materials were adopted. Results: the booklet is composed of four axes: concepts on sexual and gender diversity; LGBTphobia; barriers to LGBT+ people's health; and policies and legislation on LGBT+ people. Regarding content and appearance validity and semantic assessment, the booklet achieved a minimum Content Validity Index of 0.97. Conclusions: the booklet was considered valid and can be used as a tool for continuing education of healthcare professionals. Studies should be carried out to verify its effectiveness. |
| References: | Cien Saude Colet. 2020 May;25(5):1765-1778. (PMID: 32402047) Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Dec 21;73(suppl 6):e20190559. (PMID: 33338125) Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Nov;27(11):4289-4301. (PMID: 36259849) J Adv Nurs. 1994 Oct;20(4):769-76. (PMID: 7822615) Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 4):1635-1641. (PMID: 30088634) Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Oct;27(10):3815-3824. (PMID: 36134788) Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2020 Jan;18(1):49-51. (PMID: 32047398) Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Jun;51:101579. (PMID: 37270877) Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Mar 11;77Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e20230094. (PMID: 38477814) Int J Nurs Knowl. 2012 Oct;23(3):134-9. (PMID: 23043652) Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Sep 07;73(6):e20190511. (PMID: 32901738) BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. (PMID: 26369893) Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 26;22Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e190003. (PMID: 31576979) |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251126 Date Completed: 20251126 Latest Revision: 20251129 |
| Update Code: | 20251129 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC12659914 |
| DOI: | 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0433 |
| PMID: | 41294162 |
| Databáza: | MEDLINE |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | Objectives: to develop and validate a digital educational booklet on LGBT+ health for professionals in Primary Health Care.<br />Methods: a methodological study, prepared through bibliographic survey and analysis of the sociodemographic, educational and cultural profile of Primary Health Care professionals, content, appearance and semantics validity. For validity, the Content Validity Index equal to or greater than 0.80, binomial test and Suitability Assessment of Materials were adopted.<br />Results: the booklet is composed of four axes: concepts on sexual and gender diversity; LGBTphobia; barriers to LGBT+ people's health; and policies and legislation on LGBT+ people. Regarding content and appearance validity and semantic assessment, the booklet achieved a minimum Content Validity Index of 0.97.<br />Conclusions: the booklet was considered valid and can be used as a tool for continuing education of healthcare professionals. Studies should be carried out to verify its effectiveness. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1984-0446 |
| DOI: | 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0433 |