What are the barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of information and communication technology-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health of healthcare workers: a scoping review protocol.
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | What are the barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of information and communication technology-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health of healthcare workers: a scoping review protocol. |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Alves E; Nursing Department, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal elisabete.alves@uevora.pt.; Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; LA REAL - Associated Laboratory in Translation and Innovation towards Global Health, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal., Rodrigues R; SOCIUS/CSG, ISEG (Lisbon School of Economics and Management), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal., Fonseca C; Nursing Department, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; LA REAL - Associated Laboratory in Translation and Innovation towards Global Health, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal., Lopes M; Nursing Department, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; LA REAL - Associated Laboratory in Translation and Innovation towards Global Health, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal., Faria I; SOCIUS/CSG, ISEG (Lisbon School of Economics and Management), Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal., Dalkner N; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria., Barach P; Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.; Sigmund Freud University, Graz, Austria., Folkvord F; PredictBy Research and Consulting, Barcelona, Spain.; Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands., Carlson JI; PredictBy Research and Consulting, Barcelona, Spain., Reininghaus E; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria., Wessa M; Department of Neuropsychology and Psychological Resilience Research, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany.; Division of Cancer Survivorship and Psychological Resilience, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany., Prinzellner Y; Centre for Digital Health and Social Innovation, University of Applied Sciences St.Pölten, St.Pölten, Austria., Leung V; Centre for Digital Health and Social Innovation, University of Applied Sciences St.Pölten, St.Pölten, Austria., Turk E; Centre for Digital Health and Social Innovation, University of Applied Sciences St.Pölten, St.Pölten, Austria., de Pinho LG; Nursing Department, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.; LA REAL - Associated Laboratory in Translation and Innovation towards Global Health, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal. |
| Körperschaften: | XR2ESILIENCE team members |
| Quelle: | BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2025 Nov 13; Vol. 15 (11), pp. e097330. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Nov 13. |
| Publikationsart: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | English |
| Info zur Zeitschrift: | Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101552874 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2044-6055 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20446055 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMJ Open Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: [London] : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2011- |
| MeSH-Schlagworte: | Health Personnel*/psychology , Resilience, Psychological* , Mental Health* , Information Technology*, Humans ; Scoping Review as Topic ; Research Design ; Burnout, Professional/prevention & control ; Burnout, Professional/psychology |
| Abstract: | Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) report overwhelming demands and experience crisis levels of burnout and unique challenges that further impair their mental health. Promotion of mental health among HCWs using information and communication technology (ICT) has received little empirical research attention and interventions for improving mental health resilience in HCWs are not well established. Design: Scoping review to map existing evidence and identify gaps for future research regarding the main barriers and facilitators of the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in all healthcare settings. Methods and Analysis: This protocol was developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search will be conducted between October 2024 and October 2025 in Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CINAHL Ultimate (MedicLatina, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection), with the assistance of a qualified research librarian, to retrieve studies describing data on the main barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in healthcare settings. There will be no restrictions based on date of publication or language. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be defined for each element of the PICO(D) framework, and both quantitative and qualitative data will be extracted. Quality will be assessed using the mixed methods assessment tool. Two independent investigators will perform the eligibility assessment and data extraction, and any disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. The main results will be narratively synthesised and analysed. Ethics and Dissemination: Since secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publications subject to peer review. Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5R36Q. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.) |
| References: | Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:104002. (PMID: 34271460) J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jun;78(6):1551-1573. (PMID: 35150151) PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0296798. (PMID: 38206968) Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 06;7(6):491-503. (PMID: 29935126) Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 17;12:804525. (PMID: 35111089) Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 15;12:567381. (PMID: 34211406) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):. (PMID: 35682131) J Nurs Manag. 2022 Apr;30(3):795-816. (PMID: 35130583) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11:CD013779. (PMID: 33150970) JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Sep 6;8(3):e34230. (PMID: 36066962) Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 01;:1-12. (PMID: 35250245) Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Oct;134:104312. (PMID: 35853312) J Nurs Adm. 2022 Feb 1;52(2):112-117. (PMID: 35060953) Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Feb;19(2):85-91. (PMID: 34915610) Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. (PMID: 35026139) J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 02;17:3691-3713. (PMID: 39114858) J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4. (PMID: 25034198) BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. (PMID: 30453902) Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10173. (PMID: 33986414) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):. (PMID: 36011747) Australas Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;32(4):319-322. (PMID: 38875170) Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e92. (PMID: 25158686) PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0159015. (PMID: 27391946) Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. (PMID: 30178033) BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 21;21(1):262. (PMID: 33743674) Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(3):178-190. (PMID: 33524983) PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0305713. (PMID: 39159180) Int J Med Inform. 2024 Nov;191:105566. (PMID: 39079316) Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Sep;27(5):689-697. (PMID: 34472664) J Infect Public Health. 2023 Aug;16(8):1281-1289. (PMID: 37329608) Stress Health. 2022 Dec;38(5):848-869. (PMID: 35460533) BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):1127. (PMID: 37858175) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Burnout; Information technology; MENTAL HEALTH; Psychological Stress |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251117 Date Completed: 20251117 Latest Revision: 20251129 |
| Update Code: | 20251129 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC12658505 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097330 |
| PMID: | 41248349 |
| Datenbank: | MEDLINE |
| Abstract: | Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br />Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) report overwhelming demands and experience crisis levels of burnout and unique challenges that further impair their mental health. Promotion of mental health among HCWs using information and communication technology (ICT) has received little empirical research attention and interventions for improving mental health resilience in HCWs are not well established.<br />Design: Scoping review to map existing evidence and identify gaps for future research regarding the main barriers and facilitators of the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in all healthcare settings.<br />Methods and Analysis: This protocol was developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search will be conducted between October 2024 and October 2025 in Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CINAHL Ultimate (MedicLatina, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection), with the assistance of a qualified research librarian, to retrieve studies describing data on the main barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in healthcare settings. There will be no restrictions based on date of publication or language. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be defined for each element of the PICO(D) framework, and both quantitative and qualitative data will be extracted. Quality will be assessed using the mixed methods assessment tool. Two independent investigators will perform the eligibility assessment and data extraction, and any disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. The main results will be narratively synthesised and analysed.<br />Ethics and Dissemination: Since secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publications subject to peer review.<br />Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5R36Q.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
| DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097330 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science