The effectiveness of transcranial electrical stimulation in individuals with specific learning disorder (SLD): systematic review and transfer analysis.
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | The effectiveness of transcranial electrical stimulation in individuals with specific learning disorder (SLD): systematic review and transfer analysis. |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Nejati V; School of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, USA. vahid.nejati@utdallas.edu.; Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. vahid.nejati@utdallas.edu., Ghafuri F; Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran., Hosseini K; Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran., Behroozmand R; School of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, USA. |
| Quelle: | Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders [J Neurodev Disord] 2025 Nov 05; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 66. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Nov 05. |
| Publikationsart: | Journal Article; Systematic Review; Review |
| Sprache: | English |
| Info zur Zeitschrift: | Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101483832 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1866-1955 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 18661947 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Neurodev Disord Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: <2012-> : London : BioMed Central Original Publication: New York : Springer |
| MeSH-Schlagworte: | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation*/methods , Learning Disabilities*/therapy , Transfer, Psychology*/physiology, Humans ; Treatment Outcome |
| Abstract: | Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This review and meta-analysis study do not involve human subjects; hence, ethical approval and consent to participate are not applicable. Consent for publication: All authors consent to the publication of this study. Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. This comprehensive review aimed to investigate the transferability of transcranial electrical Stimulation (tES) interventions in individuals with specific learning disabilities (SLD) based on the FIELD model, encompassing function, implements, ecology, level, and durability. A systematic search of electronic databases yielded a total of 13 eligible studies, 11 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 1 transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), and 1 transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), encompass 286 individuals with SLD, for inclusion. The overall effect size analysis revealed positive transfer effects in all domains of FIELD, indicating the potential effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulations (NIBS) interventions in enhancing various aspects of learning and behavior in individuals with SLD. The subgroup analysis further underscored the positive impact of age, dose, and concurrent intervention on transferability. In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights into the transferability of tES interventions and holds promise for improving learning and behavioral outcomes in individuals with SLD. (© 2025. The Author(s).) |
| References: | PLoS Biol. 2020 Sep 8;18(9):e3000833. (PMID: 32898188) Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2023 Apr-Jun;12(2):137-149. (PMID: 35298314) Dev Sci. 2020 Jul;23(4):e12909. (PMID: 31599470) Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Nov;128(11):2318-2329. (PMID: 29040922) J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Feb;132(2):323-330. (PMID: 39402172) Curr Biol. 2010 Nov 23;20(22):2016-20. (PMID: 21055945) Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:143-55. (PMID: 24858066) Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;2 Suppl 1:S152-66. (PMID: 22682904) Brain Stimul. 2019 Jul - Aug;12(4):930-937. (PMID: 30826318) Neuropsychologia. 2019 May;128:332-339. (PMID: 29630916) Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Dec;16(6):1249-1259. (PMID: 36408072) Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jun;137:104650. (PMID: 35367220) Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2470-9. (PMID: 19410589) Dev Neuropsychol. 2021 Apr-Jun;46(3):232-248. (PMID: 33900858) Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jul;130:38-43. (PMID: 29550525) Dev Neuropsychol. 2018;43(6):497-507. (PMID: 29975105) J Learn Disabil. 2008 Nov-Dec;41(6):514-23. (PMID: 18625783) Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 19;11(2):. (PMID: 33669651) Neuropsychologia. 2022 Dec 15;177:108427. (PMID: 36410540) Child Neurol Open. 2018 Oct 04;5:2329048X18798255. (PMID: 30306098) Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2674-88. (PMID: 23890692) PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215095. (PMID: 30978259) Neurosci Bull. 2020 Oct;36(10):1191-1212. (PMID: 32418073) Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Feb;27(2):164-72. (PMID: 23032310) Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):435-53. (PMID: 22305345) Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Feb;8(2):151-161. (PMID: 36653210) J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Sep;25(3):372-385. (PMID: 30730159) Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:107-13. (PMID: 25701796) Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 5;7(1):4633. (PMID: 28680099) Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. (PMID: 20633386) Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 09;13:986242. (PMID: 36160506) Neurophysiol Clin. 2021 Dec;51(6):507-516. (PMID: 34518098) Prog Brain Res. 2021;264:191-210. (PMID: 34167656) Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Mar;49:101949. (PMID: 32114377) Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:559-580. (PMID: 31277876) Res Dev Disabil. 2020 Dec;107:103806. (PMID: 33152663) Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov;142:104867. (PMID: 36122739) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142. (PMID: 31643080) Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2009;15(2):94-101. (PMID: 19489084) Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 28;7:317. (PMID: 23825454) Dev Sci. 2015 May;18(3):351-72. (PMID: 25098903) J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9. (PMID: 10990547) Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 23;27(5):295-300. (PMID: 26848997) Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Feb 15;43(3):1157-1173. (PMID: 34716977) Prog Brain Res. 2021;264:91-116. (PMID: 34167666) Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):175-195. (PMID: 22037126) Neuropsychologia. 2013 Dec;51(14):2953-9. (PMID: 24184439) Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-7. (PMID: 26350410) Exp Brain Res. 2019 Mar;237(3):873-882. (PMID: 30635704) Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Jun;60(1):40-56. (PMID: 20052566) Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 29;11(2):. (PMID: 33572998) Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(2):215-26. (PMID: 26890096) Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Oct 21;7:688. (PMID: 24155708) J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jul;103(3):309-24. (PMID: 19398112) Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Dec;64:101317. (PMID: 37898018) BMC Med. 2021 Dec 17;19(1):319. (PMID: 34915885) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Effectiveness; Meta-analysis; Review; Specific learning disabilities (SLD); Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES); Transferability |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251105 Date Completed: 20251106 Latest Revision: 20251108 |
| Update Code: | 20251108 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC12587531 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s11689-025-09623-7 |
| PMID: | 41193951 |
| Datenbank: | MEDLINE |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This review and meta-analysis study do not involve human subjects; hence, ethical approval and consent to participate are not applicable. Consent for publication: All authors consent to the publication of this study. Competing interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.<br />This comprehensive review aimed to investigate the transferability of transcranial electrical Stimulation (tES) interventions in individuals with specific learning disabilities (SLD) based on the FIELD model, encompassing function, implements, ecology, level, and durability. A systematic search of electronic databases yielded a total of 13 eligible studies, 11 transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 1 transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), and 1 transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), encompass 286 individuals with SLD, for inclusion. The overall effect size analysis revealed positive transfer effects in all domains of FIELD, indicating the potential effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulations (NIBS) interventions in enhancing various aspects of learning and behavior in individuals with SLD. The subgroup analysis further underscored the positive impact of age, dose, and concurrent intervention on transferability. In conclusion, this study contributes valuable insights into the transferability of tES interventions and holds promise for improving learning and behavioral outcomes in individuals with SLD.<br /> (© 2025. The Author(s).) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1866-1955 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s11689-025-09623-7 |