Assessing violation of local cannabis delivery bans prior to enactment of California's Senate Bill 1186.
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Assessing violation of local cannabis delivery bans prior to enactment of California's Senate Bill 1186. |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Timberlake DS; Joe C. Wen School of Population and Public Health, University of California, 856 Medical Sciences, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. Electronic address: dtimberl@uci.edu., Aviles J; UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, 10960 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1550, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA., Simard BJ; Public Health Institute, 2000 Center Street Suite 308, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA., Padon AA; Public Health Institute, 2000 Center Street Suite 308, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA., Soroosh AJ; Public Health Institute, 2000 Center Street Suite 308, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA., Silver LD; Public Health Institute, 2000 Center Street Suite 308, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA. |
| Zdroj: | The International journal on drug policy [Int J Drug Policy] 2025 Nov; Vol. 145, pp. 105019. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Oct 16. |
| Spôsob vydávania: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Informácie o časopise: | Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 9014759 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-4758 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09553959 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Drug Policy Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 1998- : Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier Original Publication: Liverpool, England : International Journal on Drug Policy, |
| Výrazy zo slovníka MeSH: | Legislation, Drug* , Medical Marijuana*/administration & dosage , Cannabis*, Humans ; California/epidemiology ; Adult ; Female ; Male ; Young Adult ; Middle Aged ; Adolescent |
| Abstrakt: | Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Introduction: One of the few studies on cannabis home deliveries reported that 97 % of census block groups in California were reached by a cannabis delivery business. This suggests but does not prove that many cannabis deliverers are violating local delivery bans throughout the state. This study estimated the extent of such violations to assess the need for enforcing local bans on non-medical cannabis delivery and the relevance of expanding home deliveries of medical cannabis to any part of California (i.e. Senate Bill (SB) 1186). Methods: Adults who used cannabis in the past month were selected from the 2021 and 2022 California Health Interview Surveys (n = 6841). Delivery policies affecting study participants were determined by linking residential coordinates and corresponding jurisdictions to the California Cannabis Local Laws database. Associations between delivery policy and use of a delivery service were tested in logit models. Results: The two principal findings were the high percentage of deliveries to banned jurisdictions (37.6 %) and the null association between a delivery ban and use of a delivery service (aOR=1.01(0.75,1.35)). Although exclusive medical users had significantly greater odds of home delivery than non-medical cannabis users (aOR=1.93(1.28, 2.91); p < .01), the association was not moderated by delivery policy. Conclusions: Violation of local cannabis delivery bans was common practice in California in 2021 and 2022. While subsequent enactment of Senate Bill 1186 reduced local delivery restrictions on medical cannabis, delivery bans on non-medical cannabis remain common. Thus, jurisdictions that ban the activity should consider greater enforcement of delivery laws. (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: California Senate Bill 1186; California health interview survey; Cannabis home deliveries; Local cannabis policy; Policy violation |
| Substance Nomenclature: | 0 (Medical Marijuana) |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251017 Date Completed: 20251103 Latest Revision: 20251103 |
| Update Code: | 20251104 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.105019 |
| PMID: | 41106276 |
| Databáza: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br />Introduction: One of the few studies on cannabis home deliveries reported that 97 % of census block groups in California were reached by a cannabis delivery business. This suggests but does not prove that many cannabis deliverers are violating local delivery bans throughout the state. This study estimated the extent of such violations to assess the need for enforcing local bans on non-medical cannabis delivery and the relevance of expanding home deliveries of medical cannabis to any part of California (i.e. Senate Bill (SB) 1186).<br />Methods: Adults who used cannabis in the past month were selected from the 2021 and 2022 California Health Interview Surveys (n = 6841). Delivery policies affecting study participants were determined by linking residential coordinates and corresponding jurisdictions to the California Cannabis Local Laws database. Associations between delivery policy and use of a delivery service were tested in logit models.<br />Results: The two principal findings were the high percentage of deliveries to banned jurisdictions (37.6 %) and the null association between a delivery ban and use of a delivery service (aOR=1.01(0.75,1.35)). Although exclusive medical users had significantly greater odds of home delivery than non-medical cannabis users (aOR=1.93(1.28, 2.91); p < .01), the association was not moderated by delivery policy.<br />Conclusions: Violation of local cannabis delivery bans was common practice in California in 2021 and 2022. While subsequent enactment of Senate Bill 1186 reduced local delivery restrictions on medical cannabis, delivery bans on non-medical cannabis remain common. Thus, jurisdictions that ban the activity should consider greater enforcement of delivery laws.<br /> (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-4758 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.105019 |