Frequency, Quality, and Content of Feedback to Radiology Residents: A Needs Assessment.
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Frequency, Quality, and Content of Feedback to Radiology Residents: A Needs Assessment. |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Yang D; Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.R.P., S.S., S.R.O.)., Pantel AR; Department of Medicine, UCSF Health-St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, California (D.Y.)., Simpson S; Department of Medicine, UCSF Health-St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, California (D.Y.)., O'Brien SR; Department of Medicine, UCSF Health-St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, California (D.Y.). Electronic address: Sophia.Obrien@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. |
| Quelle: | Academic radiology [Acad Radiol] 2025 Dec; Vol. 32 (12), pp. 6972-6980. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Oct 08. |
| Publikationsart: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | English |
| Info zur Zeitschrift: | Publisher: Association Of University Radiologists Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9440159 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-4046 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10766332 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Acad Radiol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: Reston Va : Association Of University Radiologists Original Publication: Reston, VA : Association of University Radiologists, c1994- |
| MeSH-Schlagworte: | Internship and Residency* , Radiology*/education , Needs Assessment* , Feedback* , Formative Feedback*, Humans ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Female ; Male ; Faculty, Medical ; Adult |
| Abstract: | Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Rationale and Objectives: Radiology trainee and faculty experiences with feedback are underexamined in the literature. We conducted a survey-based needs assessment to better understand radiology trainee and faculty perceptions of the feedback interactions at our institution. Materials and Methods: A voluntary, anonymous, IRB-approved survey was sent to radiology residents and faculty in our academic radiology department in November 2024. Questions included demographics, frequency and setting of feedback, and feedback quality, content, and preferences. Results: 22 of 68 residents (32%) and 40 of 145 faculty (28%) submitted the survey. Compared to faculty, residents perceived that feedback exchanges occurred less frequently (p<0.01), included less explanations of why changes were made to their report (p<0.01), and included less actionable next steps (p<0.01). A majority of residents desired feedback on their performance relative to expectations based on year in training; however, overall performance was reported by residents to be one of the least common topics in feedback exchanges. Multiple barriers to feedback were identified, including lack of time, high workload, and lack of resident initiation. Conclusion: Residents perceived feedback to occur less frequently and to include discussion of multiple topics less often than faculty perceived, aligning with findings from other specialties. Notably, residents desired feedback on their overall performance, as well as explanations of why changes were made to their report and actionable next steps. Future research can investigate radiology feedback culture, barriers, and best practices to design interventions to optimize radiology feedback interactions. (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Education; Feedback; Radiology residents |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20251009 Date Completed: 20251129 Latest Revision: 20251129 |
| Update Code: | 20251130 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.028 |
| PMID: | 41067974 |
| Datenbank: | MEDLINE |
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br />Rationale and Objectives: Radiology trainee and faculty experiences with feedback are underexamined in the literature. We conducted a survey-based needs assessment to better understand radiology trainee and faculty perceptions of the feedback interactions at our institution.<br />Materials and Methods: A voluntary, anonymous, IRB-approved survey was sent to radiology residents and faculty in our academic radiology department in November 2024. Questions included demographics, frequency and setting of feedback, and feedback quality, content, and preferences.<br />Results: 22 of 68 residents (32%) and 40 of 145 faculty (28%) submitted the survey. Compared to faculty, residents perceived that feedback exchanges occurred less frequently (p<0.01), included less explanations of why changes were made to their report (p<0.01), and included less actionable next steps (p<0.01). A majority of residents desired feedback on their performance relative to expectations based on year in training; however, overall performance was reported by residents to be one of the least common topics in feedback exchanges. Multiple barriers to feedback were identified, including lack of time, high workload, and lack of resident initiation.<br />Conclusion: Residents perceived feedback to occur less frequently and to include discussion of multiple topics less often than faculty perceived, aligning with findings from other specialties. Notably, residents desired feedback on their overall performance, as well as explanations of why changes were made to their report and actionable next steps. Future research can investigate radiology feedback culture, barriers, and best practices to design interventions to optimize radiology feedback interactions.<br /> (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1878-4046 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.028 |