Development, validation and reliability of the Coach Feedback Analysis System.
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Development, validation and reliability of the Coach Feedback Analysis System. |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Corbett R; Department of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.; Department of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Atlantic Technological University Galway City, Galway, Ireland., Cope E; Department of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK., Partington M; Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK., Gannon E; Department of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Atlantic Technological University Galway City, Galway, Ireland., Ryan L; Department of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Atlantic Technological University Galway City, Galway, Ireland., Mason R; Port Adelaide Football Club, Adelaide, South Australia. |
| Zdroj: | Journal of sports sciences [J Sports Sci] 2025 Nov; Vol. 43 (22), pp. 2830-2840. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Sep 18. |
| Spôsob vydávania: | Journal Article; Validation Study |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Informácie o časopise: | Publisher: Routledge Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8405364 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1466-447X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02640414 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Sports Sci Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 2007- : London : Routledge Original Publication: [London, England] : Published by E. & F.N. Spon on behalf of the Society of Sports Sciences, [c1983- |
| Výrazy zo slovníka MeSH: | Mentoring*/methods , Formative Feedback* , Feedback* , Team Sports*, Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Male ; Adult ; Female ; Young Adult ; Competitive Behavior ; Observer Variation |
| Abstrakt: | This study aims to document the development of the Coach Feedback Analysis System (CFAS) and to detail the establishment of its validity and reliability. The CFAS consists of six categories and eighteen feedback types that help to systematically describe how coaches provide feedback in on- and off-field coaching contexts (practice, competition and video review). The validity and reliability process involved the analysis of 600 minutes of footage from these contexts across four different team sports (hurling (indigenous Irish sport), football, Australian Rules football and women's rugby union) (teams observed were male unless specified) and a variety of competitive levels (amateur, academy and professional) and age groups (u14, u16, adult). The face validity process conducted with a panel of coaching experts provided agreement that the CFAS was a valid instrument. The inter- and intra-observer reliability process also resulted in above acceptable levels of agreement between observers. It is suggested that the CFAS may be used as a coach development aid by helping to develop greater awareness between behavioural intentions and actions of how feedback is used in a variety of coaching contexts. |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Feedback; athlete learning; coach behaviour; coaching; systematic observation |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20250919 Date Completed: 20251024 Latest Revision: 20251024 |
| Update Code: | 20251024 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02640414.2025.2561346 |
| PMID: | 40968546 |
| Databáza: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | This study aims to document the development of the Coach Feedback Analysis System (CFAS) and to detail the establishment of its validity and reliability. The CFAS consists of six categories and eighteen feedback types that help to systematically describe how coaches provide feedback in on- and off-field coaching contexts (practice, competition and video review). The validity and reliability process involved the analysis of 600 minutes of footage from these contexts across four different team sports (hurling (indigenous Irish sport), football, Australian Rules football and women's rugby union) (teams observed were male unless specified) and a variety of competitive levels (amateur, academy and professional) and age groups (u14, u16, adult). The face validity process conducted with a panel of coaching experts provided agreement that the CFAS was a valid instrument. The inter- and intra-observer reliability process also resulted in above acceptable levels of agreement between observers. It is suggested that the CFAS may be used as a coach development aid by helping to develop greater awareness between behavioural intentions and actions of how feedback is used in a variety of coaching contexts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1466-447X |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02640414.2025.2561346 |