Updating the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale to DSM-5-TR/ICD-11: A new item-division based on the current neurocognitive domains.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Updating the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale to DSM-5-TR/ICD-11: A new item-division based on the current neurocognitive domains.
Autoři: de Paula JJ; Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais., Moreira LG; Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Fundacao Mineira de Educacao e Cultura., Ávila RT; Departamento de Psicologia, Universidade Fundacao Mineira de Educacao e Cultura., Nicolato R; Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais., Romano-Silva MA; Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais., Viana BM; Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais., Bicalho MAC; Departamento de Clinica Medica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Zdroj: Neuropsychology [Neuropsychology] 2025 Nov; Vol. 39 (8), pp. 730-740. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Sep 15.
Způsob vydávání: Journal Article
Jazyk: English
Informace o časopise: Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8904467 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1931-1559 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08944105 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Neuropsychology Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: Washington Dc : American Psychological Association
Original Publication: Philadelphia, PA : Philadelphia Clinical Neuropsychology Group, c1987-
Výrazy ze slovníku MeSH: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders* , Neuropsychological Tests*/standards , International Classification of Diseases* , Dementia*/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction*/diagnosis, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Psychometrics
Abstrakt: Objective: The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), a widely used cognitive assessment tool, has been revised to align with contemporary diagnostic criteria and cognitive domain classifications such as those outlined in Diagnostic Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders , fifth edition-text revision (DSM-5-TR) and eleventh version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study proposed a reorganization of DRS items into five new subscales based on cognitive domains of those classificatory manuals, aiming to enhance its construct validity and clinical utility.
Method: The DRS and other neuropsychological tests were used for the assessment of 407 older adults with low formal education and heterogeneous cognitive backgrounds. We used confirmatory factor analysis to test different arrangements of DRS items and correlated the final model with other neuropsychological tests.
Results: Our final model (following the DSM-5-TR/ICD-11 cognitive domains) showed better model fit in multiple indexes when compared with the original DRS subscales. They showed significant correlation with specific neuropsychological tests corresponding to their respective cognitive domains, supporting its validity. Group comparisons across cognitive impairment levels (cognitively unimpaired, mild neurocognitive disorder, major neurocognitive disorder) revealed progressive cognitive decline patterns consistent with clinical expectations.
Conclusions: The proposed DRS item division based in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 cognitive domains showed more consistent evidences of validity than the original. The proposed revision can use the original DRS subtests and scoring system, just reorganizing the subscales to better fit the DSM-5-TR/ICD-11 model and can in any translation/local version of the test. Further research is needed to replicate this findings and establish normative values and cutoff scores for clinical application. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Grant Information: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20250915 Date Completed: 20251016 Latest Revision: 20251120
Update Code: 20251121
DOI: 10.1037/neu0001029
PMID: 40952694
Databáze: MEDLINE
Popis
Abstrakt:Objective: The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), a widely used cognitive assessment tool, has been revised to align with contemporary diagnostic criteria and cognitive domain classifications such as those outlined in Diagnostic Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders , fifth edition-text revision (DSM-5-TR) and eleventh version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study proposed a reorganization of DRS items into five new subscales based on cognitive domains of those classificatory manuals, aiming to enhance its construct validity and clinical utility.<br />Method: The DRS and other neuropsychological tests were used for the assessment of 407 older adults with low formal education and heterogeneous cognitive backgrounds. We used confirmatory factor analysis to test different arrangements of DRS items and correlated the final model with other neuropsychological tests.<br />Results: Our final model (following the DSM-5-TR/ICD-11 cognitive domains) showed better model fit in multiple indexes when compared with the original DRS subscales. They showed significant correlation with specific neuropsychological tests corresponding to their respective cognitive domains, supporting its validity. Group comparisons across cognitive impairment levels (cognitively unimpaired, mild neurocognitive disorder, major neurocognitive disorder) revealed progressive cognitive decline patterns consistent with clinical expectations.<br />Conclusions: The proposed DRS item division based in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 cognitive domains showed more consistent evidences of validity than the original. The proposed revision can use the original DRS subtests and scoring system, just reorganizing the subscales to better fit the DSM-5-TR/ICD-11 model and can in any translation/local version of the test. Further research is needed to replicate this findings and establish normative values and cutoff scores for clinical application. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
ISSN:1931-1559
DOI:10.1037/neu0001029