Exploring the role of community pharmacists in perioperative management of antithrombotic agents: a qualitative study of barriers, facilitators, and future directions.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Exploring the role of community pharmacists in perioperative management of antithrombotic agents: a qualitative study of barriers, facilitators, and future directions.
Autoři: Capiau A; Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Andreas.Capiau@UGent.be.; Department of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Andreas.Capiau@UGent.be., Kint I; Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium., Mehuys E; Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium., De Backer T; Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.; Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium., Somers A; Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.; Department of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium., Boussery K; Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Zdroj: International journal of clinical pharmacy [Int J Clin Pharm] 2025 Dec; Vol. 47 (6), pp. 1852-1860. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Aug 30.
Způsob vydávání: Journal Article
Jazyk: English
Informace o časopise: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 101554912 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2210-7711 (Electronic) NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Clin Pharm Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: Dordrecht : Springer
Výrazy ze slovníku MeSH: Pharmacists*/trends , Fibrinolytic Agents*/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents*/administration & dosage , Fibrinolytic Agents*/therapeutic use , Perioperative Care*/methods , Perioperative Care*/trends , Professional Role* , Community Pharmacy Services*/trends , Community Pharmacy Services*/organization & administration, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Qualitative Research ; Adult ; Belgium
Abstrakt: Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ghent University Hospital (B6702024000034) on 15 January 2024. Consent to participate: All participants gave written informed consent before being interviewed.
Introduction: Antithrombotic agents are considered as high-risk medications, particularly during the perioperative period, because of the increased risk of bleeding. Balancing bleeding and thrombosis risks is crucial in the context of invasive procedures. The specific role of community pharmacists (CPs) in perioperative antithrombotic management remains unclear.
Aim: This study aimed to explore the role of CPs in perioperative antithrombotic management, focusing on their experiences, and the barriers and facilitators to expand their involvement.
Method: A qualitative study was conducted in Belgium between March and May 2024 using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with CPs. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the interview guide to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant domains. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using open and axial coding in NVivo 14 by two independent researchers. Participants were randomly sampled and recruited until no new themes were generated.
Results: A total of 13 CPs (7 female; median age 48 years, IQR 34-58) participated in the in-depth interviews. Four key themes emerged: (i) current involvement of CPs in perioperative antithrombotic management, (ii) factors influencing CPs' role, (iii) aspirations and perceived opportunities for role expansion, and (iv) proposed strategies to optimise CPs' contributions. CPs described their current role as limited and mainly reactive, with their involvement typically occurring postoperatively. Reported barriers included insufficient knowledge of antithrombotic protocols, time constraints, inconsistent and non-transparent hospital guidelines, lack of access to relevant medical records, and difficulty reaching hospital-based prescribers. Facilitators included CPs' unique position to oversee a patient's full medication regimen, strong and trusted patient relationships, early post-discharge contact, and intrinsic motivation to contribute more actively. Participants expressed a desire for more proactive and collaborative involvement, supported by structured training. They also stressed the importance of clear, well-accessible guidelines that are as uniform as possible across hospitals. Lastly, they emphasised the need for better accessibility to prescribers to facilitate more effective communication.
Conclusion: CPs' role in perioperative antithrombotic management is currently limited, particularly preoperatively. Addressing identified barriers and implementing the suggested improvements could strengthen their role. Further research is needed to validate these findings and guide future interventions.
(© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
References: Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Murad MH, et al. Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: an American College of Chest Physicians clinical practice guideline. Chest. 2022;162(5):e207–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.025 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.02535964704)
Leendertse AJ, Egberts AC, Stoker LJ, et al. Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(17):1890–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2008.3 . (PMID: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.318809816)
Omling E, Jarnheimer A, Rose J, et al. Population-based incidence rate of inpatient and outpatient surgical procedures in a high-income country. Br J Surg. 2018;105(1):86–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10643 . (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.1064329131303)
Beyer-Westendorf J, Gelbricht V, Förster K, et al. Peri-interventional management of novel oral anticoagulants in daily care: results from the prospective Dresden NOAC registry. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(28):1888–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht557 . (PMID: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht55724394381)
Munk L, van Essen T, van der Hoeven C, et al. Compliance to perioperative anticoagulation protocols in elderly patients undergoing elective orthopedic procedures: a retrospective observational cohort study on 548 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2023;17(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00357-w . (PMID: 10.1186/s13037-023-00357-w3708147910116649)
Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(39):3826–924. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270 . (PMID: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac27036017553)
Kotecha D, Breithardt G, Camm AJ, et al. Integrating new approaches to atrial fibrillation management: the 6th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference. EP Europace. 2018;20(3):395–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux318 . (PMID: 10.1093/europace/eux31829300976)
Anticoagulation Forum. Core elements of anticoagulation stewardship programs. https://acforum.org/web/downloads/ACF%20Anticoagulation%20Stewardship%20Guide.pdf . Accessed 16 Apr 2025.
Tafur AJ, Barnes GD, Bhagirath VC, et al. Anticoagulation stewardship to bridge the implementation gap in perioperative anticoagulation management. TH Open. 2024;8(1):e114–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2259-0911 . (PMID: 10.1055/a-2259-09113847698210927368)
Dreijer AR, Diepstraten J, Leebeek FWG, et al. The effect of hospital-based antithrombotic stewardship on adherence to anticoagulant guidelines. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41(3):691–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00834-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11096-019-00834-2310205986554262)
Kefale B, Peterson GM, Mirkazemi C, et al. The effect of pharmacist-led interventions on the appropriateness and clinical outcomes of anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024;10(6):488–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae045 . (PMID: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae0453900324611873792)
Falamić S, Lucijanić M, Ortner-Hadžiabdić M, et al. Pharmacists’ influence on adverse reactions to warfarin: a randomised controlled trial in elderly rural patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41(5):1166–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00894-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11096-019-00894-431493209)
Beyene K, Chan AHY, Barton E, et al. Pharmacists views on participating in New Zealand’s community pharmacy anticoagulation management service: a mixed-methods study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021;43(1):251–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01148-4 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11096-020-01148-432920685)
Ritchie LA, Penson PE, Akpan A, et al. Integrated care for atrial fibrillation management: the role of the pharmacist. Am J Med. 2022;135(12):1410–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.07.014 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.07.01436002045)
Desmaele S, De Wulf I, Dupont AG, et al. Pharmacists’ role in handling problems with prescriptions for antithrombotic medication in Belgian community pharmacies. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(4):656–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0106-3 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11096-015-0106-325822042)
Moudallel S, Cornu P, Dupont A, et al. Determinants for under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants and physicians’ implementation of clinical pharmacists’ recommendations. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88(2):753–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15017 . (PMID: 10.1111/bcp.1501734331720)
Perlman A, Horwitz E, Hirsh-Raccah B, et al. Clinical pharmacist led hospital-wide direct oral anticoagulant stewardship program. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019;8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0285-9 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13584-019-0285-9307094176357500)
van Paassen JG, Tan JP, Deneer VHM, et al. Exploring the pharmacists’ role in optimising antithrombotic therapy in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2024;14(3): e079018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079018 . (PMID: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-0790183850864810952980)
Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9286374865480145)
Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25(10):1229–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015 . (PMID: 10.1080/0887044090319401520204937)
Shang J, Ning W, Gong J, et al. Impact of clinical pharmacist services on anticoagulation management of total joint arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46(5):1301–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13428 . (PMID: 10.1111/jcpt.1342833904165)
Hyland SJ, Kramer BJ, Fada RA, et al. Clinical pharmacist service associated with improved outcomes and cost savings in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(9):2307-2317.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.022 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.02232389406)
Dreijer AR, Kruip M, Diepstraten J, et al. Effect of antithrombotic stewardship on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy during and after hospitalization. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6): e0235048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235048 . (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235048325848577316339)
Papastergiou J, Kheir N, Ladova K, et al. Pharmacists’ confidence when providing pharmaceutical care on anticoagulants, a multinational survey. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(6):1282–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0551-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s11096-017-0551-2291390195694509)
Capiau A, Mehuys E, Dhondt E, et al. Physicians’ and pharmacists’ views and experiences regarding use of direct oral anticoagulants in clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88(4):1856–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15106 . (PMID: 10.1111/bcp.1510634625983)
Saeed H, Ovalle OG, Bokhary U, et al. National physician survey for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) anticoagulation comparing knowledge, attitudes and practice of cardiologist to PCPs. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2020;26: 1076029620952550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029620952550 . (PMID: 10.1177/1076029620952550330795707791437)
Mertens JF, Koster ES, Deneer VHM, et al. Factors influencing pharmacists’ clinical decision making in pharmacy practice. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023;19(9):1267–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.009 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.00937236847)
Capiau A, De Vleeschauwer J, De Backer T, et al. Optimizing anticoagulation therapy for in-hospital patients on direct oral anticoagulants: a single-centre modified Delphi study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16159 . (PMID: 10.1111/bcp.1615938957976)
Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831–41. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.831 . (PMID: 10.1001/jama.297.8.83117327525)
Burnett AE, Barnes GD. A call to action for anticoagulation stewardship. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022;6(5): e12757. https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12757 . (PMID: 10.1002/rth2.12757358657329289116)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Antithrombotic agents; Community pharmacy services; Perioperative care; Qualitative research
Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Fibrinolytic Agents)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20250830 Date Completed: 20251119 Latest Revision: 20251119
Update Code: 20251119
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-025-01985-1
PMID: 40884687
Databáze: MEDLINE
Popis
Abstrakt:Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ghent University Hospital (B6702024000034) on 15 January 2024. Consent to participate: All participants gave written informed consent before being interviewed.<br />Introduction: Antithrombotic agents are considered as high-risk medications, particularly during the perioperative period, because of the increased risk of bleeding. Balancing bleeding and thrombosis risks is crucial in the context of invasive procedures. The specific role of community pharmacists (CPs) in perioperative antithrombotic management remains unclear.<br />Aim: This study aimed to explore the role of CPs in perioperative antithrombotic management, focusing on their experiences, and the barriers and facilitators to expand their involvement.<br />Method: A qualitative study was conducted in Belgium between March and May 2024 using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with CPs. The Theoretical Domains Framework guided the development of the interview guide to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant domains. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using open and axial coding in NVivo 14 by two independent researchers. Participants were randomly sampled and recruited until no new themes were generated.<br />Results: A total of 13 CPs (7 female; median age 48 years, IQR 34-58) participated in the in-depth interviews. Four key themes emerged: (i) current involvement of CPs in perioperative antithrombotic management, (ii) factors influencing CPs' role, (iii) aspirations and perceived opportunities for role expansion, and (iv) proposed strategies to optimise CPs' contributions. CPs described their current role as limited and mainly reactive, with their involvement typically occurring postoperatively. Reported barriers included insufficient knowledge of antithrombotic protocols, time constraints, inconsistent and non-transparent hospital guidelines, lack of access to relevant medical records, and difficulty reaching hospital-based prescribers. Facilitators included CPs' unique position to oversee a patient's full medication regimen, strong and trusted patient relationships, early post-discharge contact, and intrinsic motivation to contribute more actively. Participants expressed a desire for more proactive and collaborative involvement, supported by structured training. They also stressed the importance of clear, well-accessible guidelines that are as uniform as possible across hospitals. Lastly, they emphasised the need for better accessibility to prescribers to facilitate more effective communication.<br />Conclusion: CPs' role in perioperative antithrombotic management is currently limited, particularly preoperatively. Addressing identified barriers and implementing the suggested improvements could strengthen their role. Further research is needed to validate these findings and guide future interventions.<br /> (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
ISSN:2210-7711
DOI:10.1007/s11096-025-01985-1