View in EDS

Post-fire soil hazards: recommendations for updated soil testing protocols and clearance thresholds.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Post-fire soil hazards: recommendations for updated soil testing protocols and clearance thresholds.
Authors: Allen JG; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. jgallen@hsph.harvard.edu., Azimi P; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA., Pei G; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA., Feguson L; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA., Burghardt L; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.; Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA., Nadeau K; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Source: Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology [J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol] 2025 Nov; Vol. 35 (6), pp. 883-887. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Aug 08.
Publication Type: Journal Article; Review
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Nature Pub. Group Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101262796 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1559-064X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15590631 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: New York, NY : Nature Pub. Group, c2006-
MeSH Terms: Soil Pollutants*/analysis , Wildfires* , Environmental Exposure*/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure*/analysis , Environmental Restoration and Remediation*/methods , Environmental Restoration and Remediation*/standards , Lead*/analysis, Humans ; Los Angeles ; Soil/chemistry ; Risk Assessment ; California ; Child ; Environmental Monitoring/methods
Abstract: Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Background: Urban wildfires in Los Angeles have highlighted the increased risk of soil lead exposure, especially for children. Current post-wildfire soil remediation protocols may not sufficiently protect public health, especially in communities returning after fire events.
Objective: To evaluate the adequacy of existing soil remediation practices after urban wildfires in Los Angeles and present policy recommendations to reduce lead exposure risk.
Methods: We reviewed current wildfire debris removal protocols, soil testing practices, and health risk benchmarks for lead exposure in California. We assessed recent data from post-fire soil testing and analyzed the scientific rationale underlying California's existing Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for lead in residential soil.
Results: We recommend two critical reforms: requiring post-clearance confirmatory soil testing after wildfire cleanup, as has been done for every major wildfire in California since 2007, and lowering California's residential Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for lead in soil from 80 to 55 mg/kg to reflect updated science and health-protective standards. The basis for these recommendations is that repeated testing after purported soil remediation is showing that greater than 20% of properties still have lead levels that exceed existing thresholds, and the 80 mg/kg PRG (1) does not adhere to the health-based toxicity criterion benchmark set by California, (2) is susceptible to high uncertainty based on the values for several exposure factors used, and (3) does not accurately reflect our current understanding of risks to children from lead.
Impact Statement: This article identifies critical gaps in current post-wildfire remediation protocols that leave Los Angeles residents, especially children, at risk of lead exposure from contaminated soil. By recommending policy reforms including mandatory post-remediation soil testing and a more protective soil lead standard, our work provides an actionable roadmap to strengthen environmental health protections for communities recovering from wildfires. Adoption of these measures will help ensure a safer, healthier future in the face of escalating urban wildfire threats.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)
References: Environ Health. 2013 Aug 27;12:72. (PMID: 23981571)
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2009 Mar;12(3):206-23. (PMID: 19466673)
Toxicol In Vitro. 2009 Sep;23(6):969-72. (PMID: 19540334)
Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:108065. (PMID: 37562341)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2025 Feb 20;74(5):69-71. (PMID: 39977375)
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Sep;238:113855. (PMID: 34655857)
J Lab Clin Med. 1997 Jul;130(1):51-62. (PMID: 9242366)
Am J Dis Child. 1983 Sep;137(9):886-91. (PMID: 6613955)
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Apr;20(2):172-7. (PMID: 18332714)
Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 28;9(3):e388. (PMID: 40304010)
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211535. (PMID: 30730916)
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 May;114(5):791-7. (PMID: 16675439)
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1):. (PMID: 27325637)
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Apr;114(4):584-90. (PMID: 16581550)
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Mar;115(3):472-82. (PMID: 17431501)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Child Exposure/Health; Metals; Personal Exposure; Wildfires
Substance Nomenclature: 0 (Soil Pollutants)
2P299V784P (Lead)
0 (Soil)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20250808 Date Completed: 20251104 Latest Revision: 20251106
Update Code: 20251106
PubMed Central ID: PMC12583121
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-025-00796-w
PMID: 40781180
Database: MEDLINE
Description
Abstract:Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.<br />Background: Urban wildfires in Los Angeles have highlighted the increased risk of soil lead exposure, especially for children. Current post-wildfire soil remediation protocols may not sufficiently protect public health, especially in communities returning after fire events.<br />Objective: To evaluate the adequacy of existing soil remediation practices after urban wildfires in Los Angeles and present policy recommendations to reduce lead exposure risk.<br />Methods: We reviewed current wildfire debris removal protocols, soil testing practices, and health risk benchmarks for lead exposure in California. We assessed recent data from post-fire soil testing and analyzed the scientific rationale underlying California's existing Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for lead in residential soil.<br />Results: We recommend two critical reforms: requiring post-clearance confirmatory soil testing after wildfire cleanup, as has been done for every major wildfire in California since 2007, and lowering California's residential Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for lead in soil from 80 to 55 mg/kg to reflect updated science and health-protective standards. The basis for these recommendations is that repeated testing after purported soil remediation is showing that greater than 20% of properties still have lead levels that exceed existing thresholds, and the 80 mg/kg PRG (1) does not adhere to the health-based toxicity criterion benchmark set by California, (2) is susceptible to high uncertainty based on the values for several exposure factors used, and (3) does not accurately reflect our current understanding of risks to children from lead.<br />Impact Statement: This article identifies critical gaps in current post-wildfire remediation protocols that leave Los Angeles residents, especially children, at risk of lead exposure from contaminated soil. By recommending policy reforms including mandatory post-remediation soil testing and a more protective soil lead standard, our work provides an actionable roadmap to strengthen environmental health protections for communities recovering from wildfires. Adoption of these measures will help ensure a safer, healthier future in the face of escalating urban wildfire threats.<br /> (© 2025. The Author(s).)
ISSN:1559-064X
DOI:10.1038/s41370-025-00796-w