Quality assessment of online wildfire infographics in the United States.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Quality assessment of online wildfire infographics in the United States.
Autoři: Syed AO; University of California, Irvine, CA, USA., Jahan S; Head of Research & Innovation Unit, Family Medicine Academy, Qassim Health Cluster, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Zdroj: International journal of environmental health research [Int J Environ Health Res] 2025 Nov; Vol. 35 (11), pp. 3524-3533. Date of Electronic Publication: 2025 Apr 10.
Způsob vydávání: Journal Article
Jazyk: English
Informace o časopise: Publisher: Informa Healthcare Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9106628 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1369-1619 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09603123 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Environ Health Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: London : Informa Healthcare
Original Publication: London : Chapman & Hall, c1991-
Výrazy ze slovníku MeSH: Wildfires* , Internet* , Information Dissemination*/methods, United States ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans
Abstrakt: In recent years, the occurrence of global and regional wildfires has increased. Wildfire infographics may serve as effective risk communication tools. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated US based wildfire infographics posted online. Google search was initiated using the terms: "wildfires," and "infographics". An evaluation tool was used to assess infographics on clear headings, content, font size, visual elements, color theme and overall design on a scale of 1-5. Data was analyzed using the Jamovi statistical software. Seventy-eight wildfire infographics were evaluated with most originating from California. Fact-based infographics (46.15%) predominated while few addressed prevention (6.41%). Forty-six infographics were high quality, 23 were medium quality and 9 were low quality. Governmental sources published 60.26%, of which 65.96% were high quality. Most of the high-quality infographics were text-light (65.21%) and icon-based (65%). A significant association was found between information type and text density ( p  = 0.005). Out of the total score of 30, the mean total infographic score was 24.85 ± 3.28. None of the infographics were customized for high-risk populations. We recommend creating wildfire prevention infographics targeting high risk populations. Further research is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the infographics.
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: California; Texas; cross-sectional study; infographics; wildfires
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20250410 Date Completed: 20251103 Latest Revision: 20251103
Update Code: 20251104
DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2025.2489666
PMID: 40207897
Databáze: MEDLINE
Popis
Abstrakt:In recent years, the occurrence of global and regional wildfires has increased. Wildfire infographics may serve as effective risk communication tools. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated US based wildfire infographics posted online. Google search was initiated using the terms: "wildfires," and "infographics". An evaluation tool was used to assess infographics on clear headings, content, font size, visual elements, color theme and overall design on a scale of 1-5. Data was analyzed using the Jamovi statistical software. Seventy-eight wildfire infographics were evaluated with most originating from California. Fact-based infographics (46.15%) predominated while few addressed prevention (6.41%). Forty-six infographics were high quality, 23 were medium quality and 9 were low quality. Governmental sources published 60.26%, of which 65.96% were high quality. Most of the high-quality infographics were text-light (65.21%) and icon-based (65%). A significant association was found between information type and text density ( p  = 0.005). Out of the total score of 30, the mean total infographic score was 24.85 ± 3.28. None of the infographics were customized for high-risk populations. We recommend creating wildfire prevention infographics targeting high risk populations. Further research is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the infographics.
ISSN:1369-1619
DOI:10.1080/09603123.2025.2489666