Research on SAR image quality evaluation method based on improved harris hawk optimization algorithm and XGBoost.
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Research on SAR image quality evaluation method based on improved harris hawk optimization algorithm and XGBoost. |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Huang M; Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China.; College of Information Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, China., Zhao H; College of Information Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, China., Chen Y; Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China. chen_yazhou@sina.com. |
| Zdroj: | Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2024 Nov 17; Vol. 14 (1), pp. 28364. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Nov 17. |
| Spôsob vydávania: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Informácie o časopise: | Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE; PubMed not MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011- |
| Abstrakt: | Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is crucial for military reconnaissance and remote sensing, but image quality can be affected by various factors, impacting target detection performance. Thus, pre-evaluation of SAR image quality is essential to filter out poor-quality images, optimize resource allocation, and enhance detection accuracy and efficiency. This paper proposes a comprehensive SAR image quality evaluation method combining objective and subjective approaches. Specifically, the processes encompassing the generation of a series of disturbed SAR images on the SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD), the calculation of various objective quality indicators for those images, and the assignment of a subjective quality label to each image through subjective evaluation. Based on the dataset constructed by the above evaluation methods, the IHHO-XGBoost model was developed. This model uses an improved harris hawk optimization (IHHO) algorithm to optimize extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) hyperparameters. The IHHO algorithm effectively alleviates the problem of getting trapped in local optima by improving the escape energy calculation strategy and integrating the average difference evolution mechanism while maintaining the diversity of the population, showing significant advantages over the traditional HHO algorithm. Comparative experiments demonstrate the model's superiority in SAR image quality evaluation. This study validates the scientificity and practicability of the proposed method, offering new tools for SAR image quality research. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
| Competing Interests: | Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. |
| References: | Liu, B. et al. Application of UAV and GB-SAR in mechanism research and monitoring of Zhonghaicun landslide in Southwest China. Remote Sens. 13, 1653 (2021). (PMID: 10.3390/rs13091653) Irvine, J. M. & Nelson, E. Image quality and performance modeling for automated target detection. Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.. 7335, 73350L – 73359 (2009). Ding, C., Cui, Z., Yang, H. & Cao, Z. Correlation between SAR system resolution and target detection. J. Eng. 2019, 8037–8041 (2019). Wang, Z., Li, Y. & Yu, W. A review of SAR image quality evaluation. Remote Sens. Inform. 31, 10 (2016). Ronald, G. & Driggers,. National imagery interpretation rating system and the probabilities of detection, recognition, and identification. Opt. Eng. 36, 349–360 (1997). Wang, B., Wang, Z., Liao, Y. & Lin, X. HVS-based structural similarity for image quality assessment. Int. Conf. Signal Process. 1194–1197 (2024). Liu, Y. J., Yu, Z. & Li, C. S. A novel quality evaluation algorithm for SAR image based on human visual system. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. 3096–3099 (2013). Vespe, M. & Greidanus, H. SAR image quality assessment and indicators for vessel and oil spill detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 50, 4726–4734 (2012). (PMID: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2190293) Zhang, H., Li, Y. & Su, Y. SAR image quality assessment using coherent correlation function. In International Congress on Image and Signal Processing. 1129–1133 (2012). Yu, Z., Zou, D., Jiao, X., Li, Z. & Xu, Y. An Application-Oriented Quality Evaluation for SAR Image. IET, 205–209, (2014). Bosse, S., Maniry, D., Muller, K. R., Wiegand, T. & Samek, W. Deep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment. In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1–1, (2017). Yu, Z., Dong, G. & Liu, H. SAR image quality assessment: From sample-wise to class-wise. Remote Sens. 15, 2110 (2023). (PMID: 10.3390/rs15082110) Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001). (PMID: 10.1023/A:1010933404324) Pal, M. & Mather, P. M. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 86, 554–565 (2003). (PMID: 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00132-9) Moorthy, K. & Mohamad, M. S. Random forest for gene selection and microarray data classification. Bioinformation. 7, 142–146 (2011). (PMID: 10.6026/97320630007142221253853218317) Sulaksono, D. H. & Siregar, A. C. P. Power loss classification on shifts based on SMS (Singlemode-Multimode-Singlemode) structured fiber optic using gaussian naïve bayes method. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng. 462, 012–024 (2019). (PMID: 10.1088/1757-899X/462/1/012024) Yu, Q. & Huang, X. Classification of heart sound signals based on LightGBM. J. Shaanxi Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 48, 47–55 (2020). Huang, H., Wang, Y. J. & Zong, H. R. Support vector machine classification over encrypted data. Appl. Intell. 52, 5938–5948 (2022). (PMID: 10.1007/s10489-021-02727-2) Dhal, P. & Azad, C. A multi-objective feature selection method using Newton’s law based PSO with GWO. Appl. Soft Comput. 107, 107394 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107394) Milutinovic, N. et al. Performance of arithmetic optimization algorithm for ELM tuning applied to IoT security. In 2022 30th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR). 1–4 (2022). Dhal, P. & Azad, C. A lightweight filter based feature selection approach for multi-label text classification. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 14, 12345–12357 (2023). (PMID: 10.1007/s12652-022-04335-5) Dhal, P. & Azad, C. Hybrid momentum accelerated bat algorithm with GWO based optimization approach for spam classification. Multimed. Tools Appl. 83, 26929–26969 (2024). (PMID: 10.1007/s11042-023-16448-w) Dhal, P. & Azad, C. A fine-tuning deep learning with multi-objective-based feature selection approach for the classification of text. Neural Comput. Appl. 36, 3525–3553 (2024). (PMID: 10.1007/s00521-023-09225-1) Bacanin, N. et al. Parkinson’s disease induced gain freezing detection using gated recurrent units optimized by modified crayfish optimization algorithm. In 2024 5th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics (ICMCSI). 1–8 (2024). Molaei-Yeznabad, A. & Abedi, K. Optimal design of graphene-based plasmonic enhanced photodetector using PSO. Sci. Rep. 14, 15291 (2024). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-024-65311-x3896117811222467) Jearsiripongkul, T., Karbasforoushha, M. A., Khajehzadeh, M., Keawsawasvong, S. & Thongchom, C. An improved transient search optimization algorithm for building energy optimization and hybrid energy sizing applications. Sci. Rep. 14, 17644 (2024). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-024-68239-43908533511292019) Heidari, A. A. et al. Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 97, 849–872 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028) Yu, J., Kim, C. H. & Rhee, S. B. the comparison of lately proposed Harris hawks optimization and Jaya optimization in solving directional overcurrent relays coordination problem. Complexity. 2020, (2020). Swetha, S. G., Mahapatra, S. & Raj, S. Voltage Constrained Reactive Power Planning Problem for Reactive Loading Variation Using Hybrid Harris Hawk Particle Swarm Optimizer. Electric Power Compon. Syst. 1–15, (2021). Mohandas, P. & Devanathan, S. T. Reconfiguration with DG location and capacity optimization using crossover mutation based Harris Hawk Optimization algorithm (CMBHHO). Appl. Soft Comput. 113, 107982 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107982) Naeijian, M., Rahimnejad, A., Ebrahimi, S. M., Pourmousa, N. & Gadsden, S. A. Parameter estimation of PV solar cells and modules using Whippy Harris Hawks Optimization Algorithm. Energy Rep. 7, 4047–4063 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.085) Bao, X. A novel hybrid Harris Hawks optimization for color image multilevel thresholding segmentation. IEEE Access 7, 76529–76546 (2019). (PMID: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921545) Utama, D. M. & Widodo, D. S. An energy-efficient flow shop scheduling using hybrid Harris hawks optimization. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 10, 1154–1163 (2021). (PMID: 10.11591/eei.v10i3.2958) Elaziz, M. A. & Yousri, D. Automatic selection of heavy-tailed distributions-based synergy Henry gas solubility and Harris hawk optimizer for feature selection: case study drug design and discovery. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1–46. Hussien, A. G. et al. Recent advances in Harris Hawks optimization: A comparative study and applications. Electronics 11, 1919 (2022). (PMID: 10.3390/electronics11121919) Layeb, A. Differential evolution algorithms with novel mutations, adaptive parameters, and Weibull flight operator. Soft Comput. 28, 7039–7091 (2024). (PMID: 10.1007/s00500-023-09561-3) Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. ACM, 13–17, (2016). Putatunda, S. & Rama, K. A Comparative analysis of hyperopt as against other approaches for hyper-parameter optimization of XGBoost. In International Conference on Signal Processing 6–10 (2018). Zhang, T. et al. SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD): Official release and comprehensive data analysis. Remote Sens. 13, 3690 (2021). (PMID: 10.3390/rs13183690) Difranco, J. V. & Kaiteris, C. Radar performance review in clear and jamming environments. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. AES-17, 701–710 (2007). (PMID: 10.1109/TAES.1981.309102) Wang, H., Tang, J. & Pan, Q. MSI-HHO: Multi-strategy improved HHO algorithm for global optimization. EconPapers 12, 415 (2024). Shijie, Z., Leifu, G., Dongmei, Y. & Tujun.,. Improved HHO algorithm incorporating periodic energy decreasing and Newtonian local enhancement. Control Decis. Mak. 36, 629–636 (2021). Mirjalili, S. & Lewis, A. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95, 51–67 (2016). (PMID: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008) |
| Grant Information: | JCKYS2022DC10 the Defense Industrial Technology Development Program |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20241117 Latest Revision: 20241120 |
| Update Code: | 20260130 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC11570619 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-024-79674-8 |
| PMID: | 39551817 |
| Databáza: | MEDLINE |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is crucial for military reconnaissance and remote sensing, but image quality can be affected by various factors, impacting target detection performance. Thus, pre-evaluation of SAR image quality is essential to filter out poor-quality images, optimize resource allocation, and enhance detection accuracy and efficiency. This paper proposes a comprehensive SAR image quality evaluation method combining objective and subjective approaches. Specifically, the processes encompassing the generation of a series of disturbed SAR images on the SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD), the calculation of various objective quality indicators for those images, and the assignment of a subjective quality label to each image through subjective evaluation. Based on the dataset constructed by the above evaluation methods, the IHHO-XGBoost model was developed. This model uses an improved harris hawk optimization (IHHO) algorithm to optimize extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) hyperparameters. The IHHO algorithm effectively alleviates the problem of getting trapped in local optima by improving the escape energy calculation strategy and integrating the average difference evolution mechanism while maintaining the diversity of the population, showing significant advantages over the traditional HHO algorithm. Comparative experiments demonstrate the model's superiority in SAR image quality evaluation. This study validates the scientificity and practicability of the proposed method, offering new tools for SAR image quality research.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2045-2322 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-024-79674-8 |