Why the Fermi paradox may not be well explained by Wong and Bartlett's theory of civilization collapse. A Comment on: 'Asymptotic burnout and homeostatic awakening: a possible solution to the Fermi paradox?' (2022) by Wong and Bartlett.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: Why the Fermi paradox may not be well explained by Wong and Bartlett's theory of civilization collapse. A Comment on: 'Asymptotic burnout and homeostatic awakening: a possible solution to the Fermi paradox?' (2022) by Wong and Bartlett.
Autori: Jackson CJ; School of Management and Governance, University of New South Wales, Australia., Criado-Perez C; School of Management and Governance, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Zdroj: Journal of the Royal Society, Interface [J R Soc Interface] 2024 Oct; Vol. 21 (219), pp. 20240140. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Oct 23.
Spôsob vydávania: Journal Article
Jazyk: English
Informácie o časopise: Publisher: Royal Society Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101217269 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1742-5662 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17425662 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J R Soc Interface Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Original Publication: London : Royal Society, [2004]-
Výrazy zo slovníka MeSH: Civilization*, Humans ; Models, Theoretical
Abstrakt: Wong and Bartlett explain the Fermi paradox by arguing that neither human nor extra-terrestrial civilizations can escape the time window singularity which, they claim, results from the way in which social characteristics of civilizations follow super-linear growth curves of cities. We question if data at the city level necessarily can lead to conclusions at the civilization level. More specifically, we suggest ways in which learnings from research, foresight, diversity and effective future government might act outside of their model to regulate super-linear growth curves of civilizations, and thus substantively increase the likelihood of civilizations progressing towards higher levels of the Kardashev scale. Moreover, we believe their claimed history of the collapse of terrestrial societies used to evidence their model is difficult to justify. Overall, we cast reasonable doubt on the ability of their proposed model to satisfactorily explain the Fermi paradox.
References: Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;38(2):337-41. (PMID: 19179346)
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016 Feb;55:96-104. (PMID: 26411896)
Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:937860. (PMID: 22229042)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38. (PMID: 20068583)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):. (PMID: 33339119)
J R Soc Interface. 2022 May;19(190):20220029. (PMID: 35506212)
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Dec;19(6):1319-1351. (PMID: 31115833)
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Aug;72(2 Pt 2):026204. (PMID: 16196681)
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jan;6:100049. (PMID: 33521742)
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 30;5(1):eaav0042. (PMID: 30729161)
Phys Life Rev. 2023 Dec;47:35-62. (PMID: 37703703)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 03;14:2. (PMID: 24383766)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 6;109(10):3628-31. (PMID: 22371580)
JAMA. 1999 Mar 10;281(10):914-20. (PMID: 10078488)
Nature. 2017 Dec 7;552(7683):7. (PMID: 29219985)
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 08;280(1754):20122845. (PMID: 23303549)
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Sep-Oct;80(5):765-773. (PMID: 32836443)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):293-301. (PMID: 19559644)
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Jun;6(2):206-17. (PMID: 26099487)
BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1294A. (PMID: 10231287)
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Aug;18(181):20210223. (PMID: 34343453)
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Mar;7(3):365-374. (PMID: 36702938)
BMJ. 2015 Sep 21;351:h4773. (PMID: 26391012)
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Mar 29;16(152):20180758. (PMID: 30862282)
Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Fermi paradox; crisis; end of civilization; exo-civilization; growth curves; singularity
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20241023 Date Completed: 20241023 Latest Revision: 20241101
Update Code: 20250114
PubMed Central ID: PMC11523100
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0140
PMID: 39441171
Databáza: MEDLINE
Popis
Abstrakt:Wong and Bartlett explain the Fermi paradox by arguing that neither human nor extra-terrestrial civilizations can escape the time window singularity which, they claim, results from the way in which social characteristics of civilizations follow super-linear growth curves of cities. We question if data at the city level necessarily can lead to conclusions at the civilization level. More specifically, we suggest ways in which learnings from research, foresight, diversity and effective future government might act outside of their model to regulate super-linear growth curves of civilizations, and thus substantively increase the likelihood of civilizations progressing towards higher levels of the Kardashev scale. Moreover, we believe their claimed history of the collapse of terrestrial societies used to evidence their model is difficult to justify. Overall, we cast reasonable doubt on the ability of their proposed model to satisfactorily explain the Fermi paradox.
ISSN:1742-5662
DOI:10.1098/rsif.2024.0140