Promoting research integrity in funding: Co-creating guidelines for research funding organizations.
Gespeichert in:
| Titel: | Promoting research integrity in funding: Co-creating guidelines for research funding organizations. |
|---|---|
| Autoren: | Jegan R; Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium., Labib K; Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Dierickx K; Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium., Aubert Bonn N; Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Healthcare and Ethics, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium., Tijdink J; Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; Department of Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Marušić A; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia., Pizzolato D; Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; European Network of Research Ethics Committees, Bonn, Germany. |
| Quelle: | Accountability in research [Account Res] 2025 Nov; Vol. 32 (8), pp. 1349-1368. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 28. |
| Publikationsart: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | English |
| Info zur Zeitschrift: | Publisher: Informa Healthcare Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9100813 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1545-5815 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08989621 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Account Res Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: London : Informa Healthcare Original Publication: New York : Gordon and Breach, 1989- |
| MeSH-Schlagworte: | Guidelines as Topic* , Research Support as Topic*/standards , Ethics, Research* , Biomedical Research*/economics , Biomedical Research*/standards , Biomedical Research*/ethics, Humans ; Delphi Technique |
| Abstract: | Research Funding Organizations (RFOs) play an important role in promoting research integrity (RI). Not only do they allocate resources to research institutions and researchers, but they also set and monitor research standards in their funded projects. In spite of their crucial role, there is a paucity of guidance on how RFOs can promote research integrity. As part of the EU-Funded SOPs4RI project, we aimed to address this gap by co-creating guidelines to help RFOs promote RI, engaging a diverse group of stakeholders. Based on a Delphi survey, reviews of evidence and stakeholder interviews, three guideline topics were identified: 1) the selection and evaluation of proposals; 2) monitoring of funded projects; and 3) prevention of unjustified interference. Four sets of co-creation workshops were conducted for each guideline topic, and the input revised and finalized. Understanding these debates could help RFOs from diverse cultural and organizational backgrounds who are developing their own RI guidelines. Therefore, in this paper, we summarize the key results and emphasize the final recommendations. Further, we provide the main points of discussion that occurred during the workshops and explain how they were addressed or resolved in the final guidelines and how they can help in future endeavors to improve funders' practices to foster RI. |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: Research integrity; funding process; research funding organizations; research integrity policies |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20240828 Date Completed: 20251024 Latest Revision: 20251024 |
| Update Code: | 20251024 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/08989621.2024.2388232 |
| PMID: | 39194959 |
| Datenbank: | MEDLINE |
| Abstract: | Research Funding Organizations (RFOs) play an important role in promoting research integrity (RI). Not only do they allocate resources to research institutions and researchers, but they also set and monitor research standards in their funded projects. In spite of their crucial role, there is a paucity of guidance on how RFOs can promote research integrity. As part of the EU-Funded SOPs4RI project, we aimed to address this gap by co-creating guidelines to help RFOs promote RI, engaging a diverse group of stakeholders. Based on a Delphi survey, reviews of evidence and stakeholder interviews, three guideline topics were identified: 1) the selection and evaluation of proposals; 2) monitoring of funded projects; and 3) prevention of unjustified interference. Four sets of co-creation workshops were conducted for each guideline topic, and the input revised and finalized. Understanding these debates could help RFOs from diverse cultural and organizational backgrounds who are developing their own RI guidelines. Therefore, in this paper, we summarize the key results and emphasize the final recommendations. Further, we provide the main points of discussion that occurred during the workshops and explain how they were addressed or resolved in the final guidelines and how they can help in future endeavors to improve funders' practices to foster RI. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1545-5815 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/08989621.2024.2388232 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science