Web Site Accessibility Among Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs in the United States.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Web Site Accessibility Among Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs in the United States.
Authors: Ness BM; Brandon M. Ness is the associate professor and assistant director of curriculum in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 ( Brandon.Ness@tufts.edu ). Please address all correspondence to Brandon M. Ness.; Neeti Pathare is the associate professor in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Mark P. Wilhelm is the associate professor and director of admissions in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Elizabeth C. Wonsetler-Jones is the assistant professor and assistant director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Jennifer Parent-Nichols is the clinical associate professor and director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine., Pathare N; Brandon M. Ness is the associate professor and assistant director of curriculum in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 ( Brandon.Ness@tufts.edu ). Please address all correspondence to Brandon M. Ness.; Neeti Pathare is the associate professor in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Mark P. Wilhelm is the associate professor and director of admissions in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Elizabeth C. Wonsetler-Jones is the assistant professor and assistant director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Jennifer Parent-Nichols is the clinical associate professor and director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine., Wilhelm MP; Brandon M. Ness is the associate professor and assistant director of curriculum in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 ( Brandon.Ness@tufts.edu ). Please address all correspondence to Brandon M. Ness.; Neeti Pathare is the associate professor in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Mark P. Wilhelm is the associate professor and director of admissions in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Elizabeth C. Wonsetler-Jones is the assistant professor and assistant director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Jennifer Parent-Nichols is the clinical associate professor and director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine., Wonsetler-Jones EC; Brandon M. Ness is the associate professor and assistant director of curriculum in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 ( Brandon.Ness@tufts.edu ). Please address all correspondence to Brandon M. Ness.; Neeti Pathare is the associate professor in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Mark P. Wilhelm is the associate professor and director of admissions in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Elizabeth C. Wonsetler-Jones is the assistant professor and assistant director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Jennifer Parent-Nichols is the clinical associate professor and director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine., Parent-Nichols J; Brandon M. Ness is the associate professor and assistant director of curriculum in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 ( Brandon.Ness@tufts.edu ). Please address all correspondence to Brandon M. Ness.; Neeti Pathare is the associate professor in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Mark P. Wilhelm is the associate professor and director of admissions in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Elizabeth C. Wonsetler-Jones is the assistant professor and assistant director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.; Jennifer Parent-Nichols is the clinical associate professor and director of student affairs in the Doctor of Physical Therapy Program (Boston) at the Tufts University School of Medicine.
Source: Journal, physical therapy education [J Phys Ther Educ] 2025 Mar 01; Vol. 39 (1), pp. 91-97. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 28.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Language: English
Journal Info: Publisher: Section For Education, American Physical Therapy Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9306054 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1938-3533 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08991855 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Phys Ther Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
Imprint Name(s): Publication: Alexandria Va : Section For Education, American Physical Therapy Association
Original Publication: [Alexandria, Va.] : Section for Education, American Physical Therapy Association, [1987-
MeSH Terms: Physical Therapy Specialty*/education , Internet* , Internet Access*/statistics & numerical data, United States ; Humans ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Accreditation
Abstract: Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Introduction: Given the impetus to improve accessibility for diverse learners seeking physical therapist education, it is critical that all entry points to access information have minimal barriers. This study identified Web site accessibility barriers among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States.
Review of Literature: Web site accessibility has been evaluated among many institutions of higher education, but none focused on DPT education. Individuals with disabilities may be adversely affected by Web site accessibility barriers.
Subjects: This cross-sectional study included 262 DPT programs in the United States. Doctor of Physical Therapy program characteristics collected were geographic region, institutional control type (public/private), medical school affiliation, accreditation status, total institutional enrollment, and DPT class size.
Methods: The Web Accessibility Evaluation (WAVE) Tool assessed data related to accessibility barriers among DPT program homepage Uniform Resource Locators. Three primary outcomes from the WAVE Tool included WAVE Total Errors, Error Density, and Total Alerts.
Results: Web site homepage accessibility barriers varied among programs for WAVE Total Errors (range 0-150), Error Density (range 0-14.6%), and Total Alerts (range 1-331). Median Total Errors were greater among private (9.0) versus public (5.0) institution Web sites ( P < .001). Median Total Errors were greater among those institutions not affiliated with a medical school (9.0) compared with those that had an affiliated medical school (7.0) ( P = .04). No differences in accessibility barriers were identified according to geographic region or accreditation status ( P > .05). Median Total Errors were significantly different between institutional enrollment quartiles (H[3] = 17.9, P < .001), with no differences noted between DPT class size quartiles for any outcome ( P > .05). Generally, weak-fair inverse correlations were observed between student enrollment for the institution and Web site accessibility barrier outcomes.
Discussion and Conclusion: Homepage accessibility barriers varied greatly among DPT programs in the United States. Factors, including being a private institution, no medical school affiliation, and lower institutional enrollment, were related to increased accessibility barriers.
(Copyright © 2024 Academy of Physical Therapy Education, APTA.)
References: Hinman MR, Peterson CA, Gibbs KA. Prevalence of physical disability and accommodation needs among students in physical therapy education programs. J Postsecond Educ Disabil. 2015;28:309-328.
National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of education statistics. Table 311.10. Number and percentage distribution of students enrolled in postsecondary institutions, by level, disability status, and selected student characteristics: 2015-16. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21&#95;311.10.asp?current=yes . Accessed April 18, 2023.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disability impacts all of us; 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/infographic-disability-impacts-all.html . Accessed April 18, 2023.
Bulk LY, Easterbrook A, Roberts E, et al. We are not anything alike: Marginalization of health professionals with disabilities. Disabil Soc. 2017;32:615-634. doi. 10.1080/09687599.2017.1308247. (PMID: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1308247)
American Physical Therapy Association. APTA strategic plan 2022-2025; 2022. https://www.apta.org/apta-and-you/leadership-and-governance/vision-mission-and-strategic-plan/strategic-plan . Accessed April 21, 2023.
American Physical Therapy Association. APTA public policy priorities 2021-2022; 2022. https://www.apta.org/advocacy/issues/apta-public-policy-priorities . Accessed April 21, 2023.
American Council of Academic Physical Therapy, American Physical Therapy Association, and APTA Academy of Education. A vision for excellence in physical therapy education: Culmination of the work of the education leadership partnership august 2021. J Phys Ther Educ. 2021;35:1-35. doi. 10.1097/jte.0000000000000216. (PMID: 10.1097/jte.0000000000000216)
American Physical Therapy Association. Definition of underrepresented minority populations in physical therapy education; 2020. https://www.apta.org/apta-and-you/leadership-and-governance/policies/definition-of-underrepresented-minority-populations-in-physical-therapy-education . Accessed May 8, 2023.
American Physical Therapy Association. APTA House of Delegates Recap; 2022. https://www.apta.org/article/2022/08/22/2022-hod-recap . Accessed April 17, 2023.
World Confederation for Physical Therapy. WCPT briefing paper: Access to physical therapist education and practice for people with disabilities; 2016. https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2020-06/Disability-Access-Briefing-Paper-201602.pdf . Accessed April 17, 2023.
Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics. Use of supports among students with disabilities and special needs in college; 2022. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2022071 . Accessed May 17, 2023.
Ozelie R, Delehoy M, Jones S, Sykstus E, Weil V. Accommodation use by individuals with disabilities in occupational therapy fieldwork. J Occup Ther Educ. 2019;3:7.
Lazar J, Goldstein D, Taylor A. Chapter 3–the discriminatory impact of digital inaccessibility. In: Lazar J, Goldstein D, Taylor A, eds. Ensuring Digital Accessibility Through Process and Policy. Morgan Kaufmann; 2015:41-58.
Campoverde-Molina M, Luján-Mora S, Valverde L. Accessibility of university websites worldwide: A systematic literature review. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2023;22:133-168. doi. 10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s10209-021-00825-z)
Spindler T. The accessibility of web pages for mid-sized college and university libraries. Ref User Serv Q. 2002;42:149-154.
Thompson T, Burgstahler S, Comden D. Research on web accessibility in higher education. Inf Technol Disabil J. 2003;9.
Hackett S, Parmanto B. A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: Higher education web sites. Internet Res. 2005;15:281-294.
Comeaux D, Schmetzke A. Web accessibility trends in university libraries and library schools. Libr Hi Tech. 2007;25:457-477. doi. 10.1108/07378830710840437. (PMID: 10.1108/07378830710840437)
Krach SK. Snapshot—ten years after the law: A survey of the current status of university web accessibility. J Spec Educ Technol. 2007;22:30-40. doi. 10.1177/016264340702200403. (PMID: 10.1177/016264340702200403)
Harper KA, DeWaters J. A Quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. Internet Higher Educ. 2008;11:160-164. doi. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.007)
Thompson T, Burgstahler S, Moore EJ. Web accessibility: A longitudinal study of college and university home pages in the northwestern United States. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:108-114. doi. 10.3109/17483100903387424. (PMID: 10.3109/17483100903387424)
Thompson T, Comden D, Ferguson S, Burgstahler S, Moore EJ. Seeking predictors of web accessibility in U.S. higher education institutions. Inf Technol Disabil J. 2013;13:18.
Ringlaben R, Bray M, Packard A. Accessibility of American university special education departments' web sites. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2014;13:249-254. doi. 10.1007/s10209-013-0302-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s10209-013-0302-7)
Pendergast MO. Evaluating the accessibility of online university education. Int J Online Pedagog Course Des. 2017;7:1-14. doi. 10.4018/IJOPCD.2017010101. (PMID: 10.4018/IJOPCD.2017010101)
Baule SM. Evaluating the accessibility of special education cooperative websites for individuals with disabilities. TechTrends. 2020;64:50-56. doi. 10.1007/s11528-019-00421-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s11528-019-00421-2)
Acosta-Vargas P, Antonio Salvador-Ullauri L, Luján-Mora S. A heuristic method to evaluate web accessibility for users with low vision. IEEE Access. 2019;7:125634-125648. doi. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939068. (PMID: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939068)
W3C Web Accessibilty Initiative. WCAG 2 overview; 2023. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/ . Accessed on January 5, 2024.
Rahmatizadeh S, Valizadeh-Haghi S. Monitoring for accessibility in medical university websites: Meeting the needs of people with disabilities. J Accessibility Des All. 2018;8:102-124. doi. 10.17411/jacces.v8i2.150. (PMID: 10.17411/jacces.v8i2.150)
American College Health Association. National college health assessment. Undergraduate student refererence group data report spring; 2023. https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA-III&#95;SPRING&#95;2023&#95;UNDERGRAD&#95;REFERENCE&#95;GROUP&#95;DATA&#95;REPORT.pdf . Accessed January 9, 2024.
Erickson W, Trerise S, Lee C, VanLooy S, Knowlton S, Bruyère S. The accessibility and usability of college websites: Is your website presenting barriers to potential students? Community Coll J Res Pract. 2013;37:864-876. doi. 10.1080/10668926.2010.484772. (PMID: 10.1080/10668926.2010.484772)
Schmutz S, Sonderegger A, Sauer J. Effects of accessible website design on nondisabled users: Age and device as moderating factors. Ergonomics. 2018;61:697-709. doi. 10.1080/00140139.2017.1405080. (PMID: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1405080)
Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. Physical Therapy Programs in the US. https://aptaapps.apta.org/accreditedschoolsdirectory/AllPrograms.aspx . Accessed March 23, 2023.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Accredited MD programs in the United States; 2023. https://lcme.org/directory/accredited-u-s-programs/ . Accessed June 6, 2023.
American Osteopathic Association. Osteopathic Medical Schools. https://osteopathic.org/about/affiliated-organizations/osteopathic-medical-schools/ . Accessed June 6, 2023.
United States Census Bureau. Census regions and Divisions of the United States; 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/economic-census/guidance-geographies/levels.html . Accessed April 17, 2023.
Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics. Integrated postsecondary education data system. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data . Accessed April 27, 2023.
Physical Therapist Centralized Application Service. List of PTCAS Programs. https://ptcasdirectory.apta.org/39/List-of-PTCAS-Programs . Accessed April 27, 2023.
Ahmi A, Mohamad R. Evaluating accessibility of Malaysian public universities websites using AChecker and WAVE. J Inf Commun Technol. 2016;15:193-214.
AlMeraj Z, Boujarwah F, Alhuwail D, Qadri R. Evaluating the accessibility of higher education institution websites in the state of Kuwait: Empirical evidence. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2021;20:121-138. doi. 10.1007/s10209-020-00717-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s10209-020-00717-8)
Ismail A, Kuppusamy KS. Accessibility of Indian universities' homepages: An exploratory study. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2018;30:268-278. doi. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.06.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.06.006)
İŞeri Eİ, Uyar K, İlhan Ü. The accessibility of Cyprus Islands' higher education institution websites. Proced Comput Sci. 2017;120:967-974. doi. 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.333. (PMID: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.333)
Wahbi I, Wahsheh HA, Alsmadi IM, Al-Kabi MN. Evaluating web accessibility metrics for Jordanian universities. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2016;7:113-122.
Jo G, Habib D, Varadaraj V, et al. COVID-19 vaccine website accessibility dashboard. Disabil Health J. 2022;15:101325. doi. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101325. (PMID: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101325)
WebAIM. The WebAIM Million; 2023. https://webaim.org/projects/million/ . Accessed on May 8, 2023.
WebAIM. WAVE API: Web Accessiblity Evaluation Tool. https://wave.webaim.org/api/ . Accessed April 21, 2023.
WebAIM. WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools. https://wave.webaim.org/ . Accessed April 14, 2024.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191.
Abu Doush I, Alhami I. Evaluating the accessibility of computer laboratories, libraries, and websites in Jordanian universities and colleges. Int J Inf Syst Soc Chang. 2018;9:44-60. doi. 10.4018/ijissc.2018040104. (PMID: 10.4018/ijissc.2018040104)
EDUCAUSE. CDS interactive almanac: IT spending and staffing. 2023. https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/research/analytics-services/it-spending-and-staffing-interactive-almanac . Accessed March 5, 2024.
Campanile J, Cerilli C, Varadaraj V, et al. Accessibility and disability inclusion among top-funded U.S. Undergraduate Institutions. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0277249. doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0277249. (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277249)
National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics. Table 303.10. Total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by attendance status, sex of student, and control of institution: Selected years, 1947 through 2030. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21&#95;303.10.asp . Accessed March 6, 2024.
U.S. Department of Education: Office for Civil Rights. Protecting students with disabilities; 2020. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/504faq.html . Accessed May 17, 2023.
U.S. Access Board. Rehabilitation Act of 1973. https://www.access-board.gov/about/law/ra.html . Accessed April 14, 2024.
Coffman S, Draper C. Universal design for learning in higher education: A concept analysis. Teach Learn Nurs. 2022;17:36-41. doi. 10.1016/j.teln.2021.07.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.teln.2021.07.009)
Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240702 Date Completed: 20250423 Latest Revision: 20250423
Update Code: 20250423
DOI: 10.1097/JTE.0000000000000357
PMID: 38954766
Database: MEDLINE
Description
Abstract:Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.<br />Introduction: Given the impetus to improve accessibility for diverse learners seeking physical therapist education, it is critical that all entry points to access information have minimal barriers. This study identified Web site accessibility barriers among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States.<br />Review of Literature: Web site accessibility has been evaluated among many institutions of higher education, but none focused on DPT education. Individuals with disabilities may be adversely affected by Web site accessibility barriers.<br />Subjects: This cross-sectional study included 262 DPT programs in the United States. Doctor of Physical Therapy program characteristics collected were geographic region, institutional control type (public/private), medical school affiliation, accreditation status, total institutional enrollment, and DPT class size.<br />Methods: The Web Accessibility Evaluation (WAVE) Tool assessed data related to accessibility barriers among DPT program homepage Uniform Resource Locators. Three primary outcomes from the WAVE Tool included WAVE Total Errors, Error Density, and Total Alerts.<br />Results: Web site homepage accessibility barriers varied among programs for WAVE Total Errors (range 0-150), Error Density (range 0-14.6%), and Total Alerts (range 1-331). Median Total Errors were greater among private (9.0) versus public (5.0) institution Web sites ( P &lt; .001). Median Total Errors were greater among those institutions not affiliated with a medical school (9.0) compared with those that had an affiliated medical school (7.0) ( P = .04). No differences in accessibility barriers were identified according to geographic region or accreditation status ( P &gt; .05). Median Total Errors were significantly different between institutional enrollment quartiles (H[3] = 17.9, P &lt; .001), with no differences noted between DPT class size quartiles for any outcome ( P &gt; .05). Generally, weak-fair inverse correlations were observed between student enrollment for the institution and Web site accessibility barrier outcomes.<br />Discussion and Conclusion: Homepage accessibility barriers varied greatly among DPT programs in the United States. Factors, including being a private institution, no medical school affiliation, and lower institutional enrollment, were related to increased accessibility barriers.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Academy of Physical Therapy Education, APTA.)
ISSN:1938-3533
DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000357