Reclaiming Self-Balancing on a Tightrope Across Time a grounded theory of transition to survivorship in older adult blood cancer survivors.
Uložené v:
| Názov: | Reclaiming Self-Balancing on a Tightrope Across Time a grounded theory of transition to survivorship in older adult blood cancer survivors. |
|---|---|
| Autori: | Wood SK; Adelphi University College of Nursing and Public Health, Garden City, New York, USA. |
| Zdroj: | Journal of advanced nursing [J Adv Nurs] 2025 Jan; Vol. 81 (1), pp. 366-382. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 23. |
| Spôsob vydávania: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Informácie o časopise: | Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7609811 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2648 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03092402 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Adv Nurs Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: Oxford : Blackwell Scientific Publications Original Publication: Oxford, Blackwell. |
| Výrazy zo slovníka MeSH: | Cancer Survivors*/psychology , Cancer Survivors*/statistics & numerical data , Grounded Theory* , Qualitative Research*, Humans ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Male ; Survivorship ; Canada ; United States ; Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology ; Quality of Life/psychology ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Self Concept |
| Abstrakt: | Aim: To develop a theoretical understanding of the transition to survivorship in older adult blood cancer survivors. Design: Qualitative research employing Classic Glaserian Grounded Theory methods. Methods: Purposive and theoretical sampling recruited 17 participants via Leukaemia & Lymphoma Society© Community webpages (65-83 years) from across the US and Canada. Data from individual semi-structured interviews using HIPPA-compliant Zoom© were analysed from September 2020 to March 2021. Results: Participants' main concern was losing their sense of self and reclaiming self was the core category. The substantive theory of Reclaiming Self-Balancing on a Tightrope Across Time is a six-phase transition process to survivorship: receiving a blood cancer diagnosis, finding bearings, reclaiming self, persevering through, realizing a transition and living in a new reality. Conclusions: The transition to survivorship in older adult blood cancer survivors is a complex process because of age and disease type. Implications: Age-related aspects of one's sense of self and its relation to health, well-being and quality of life, as older adult blood cancer survivors advance into older age need further research. Ageism and its impact on cancer survivorship care in older adults should also be explored. Impact: What problem did the study address?: Existing theoretical frameworks do not explain the complex process of transition to survivorship for older adult blood cancer survivors. What were the main findings?: A substantive theory Reclaiming Self-Balancing on a Tightrope Across Time is a six-phase transition process from cancer diagnosis to survivorship characterized by an uncertain and liminal nature. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: Understanding how older adults experience the transition to survivorship can inform age-appropriate person-centered nursing practices and healthcare policies specific to their needs. Reporting Method: COREQ. Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution. (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| References: | Atherton, K., Young, B., & Salmon, S. (2017). Understanding the information needs of people with haematological cancers. A meta‐ethnography of quantitative and qualitative research. European Journal of Cancer Care, 26(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12647. Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press. Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health & Illness, 5(2), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‐9566.ep10491512. Corbett, T., & Bridges, J. (2019). Multimorbidity in older adults living with and beyond cancer. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 13(3), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1097/spc.0000000000000439. Fitch, M., Zomer, S., Lockwood, G., Louzado, C., Shaw Moxam, R., Rahal, R., & Green, E. (2019). Experiences of adult cancer survivors in transitions. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(8), 2977–2986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520‐018‐4605‐3. Fitch, M. I., Nicoll, I., Lockwood, G., Strohschein, F. J., & Newton, L. (2021). Main challenges in survivorship transitions: Perspectives of older adults with cancer. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 12(4), 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.09.024. Ghodraty‐Jabloo, V., Alibhai, S. M. H., Breunis, H., & Puts, M. T. E. (2015). One day at a time: Improving the patient experience during and after intensive chemotherapy for younger and older AML patients. Leukemia Research, 39(2), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2014.11.028. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emerging vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (2014). Choosing classic grounded theory: A grounded theory reader of expert advice. Sociology Press. Haase, K. R., Sattar, S., Pilleron, S., Lambrechts, Y., Hannan, M., Navarrete, E., Kantilal, K., Newton, L., Kantilal, K., Jin, R., van der Wal‐Huisman, H., Strohschein, F. J., Pergolotti, M., Read, K. B., Kenis, C., & Puts, M. (2023). A scoping review of ageism towards older adults in cancer care. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 14(1), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.014. Hanna, D. R. (2013). Roy's specific life values and the philosophical assumption of humanism. Nursing Science Quarterly, 26(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318412467070. Hannum, S. M., Clegg Smith, K., Coa, K., & Klassen, A. C. (2016). Identity reconstruction among older cancer survivors: Age and meaning in the context of a life‐altering illness. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 34(6), 477–492. Hubbard, G., & Forbat, L. (2012). Cancer as biographical disruption: Constructions of living with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(9), 2033–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520‐011‐1311‐9. Lally, R. M., & Underhill, M. L. (2012). Transition to breast cancer survivorship: A longitudinal qualitative follow‐up study of two‐year survivors. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30(1), 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2011.633983. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. LLS Community. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://communityview.lls.org/dashboard. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. Little, M., Jordens, C. F. C., Paul, K., Montgomery, K., & Philipson, B. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 47(10), 1485–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277‐9536(98)00248‐2. Matheson, L., Boulton, M., Lavender, V., Collins, G., & Mitchell‐Floyd, T. (2016). The experiences of young adults with hodgkin lymphoma transitioning to survivorship: A grounded theory study. Oncology Nursing Forum, 43(5), E195–E204. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.ONF.E195‐E2014. Meleis, A. I. (2020). Afaf Meleis's transitions theory. In M. Smith (Ed.), Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed., pp. 353–370). F. A. Davis. Chap 20. Miller, K., Merry, B., & Miller, J. (2008). Seasons of survivorship revisited. Cancer Journal, 14(6), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e31818edf60. Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Devasia, T., Mariotto, A. B., Yabroff, K. R., Jemal, A., Kramer, J., & Siegel, R. L. (2022). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 72, 409–436. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21731. Morse, J. M., & O'Brien, B. (1995). Preserving self: From victim, to patient, to disabled person. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 21(5), 886–896. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365‐2648.1995.21050886.x. Morse, J. M., & Penrod, J. (1999). Linking concepts of enduring, uncertainty, suffering, and hope. Image—The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(2), 145–150. Muhsen, I. N., Bar, M., Savani, B. N., Estey, E. H., & Hashmi, S. K. (2020). Follow‐up issues in survivors of hematologic malignancies—Current stance and future perspectives. Blood Reviews, 44, 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2020.100674. National Cancer Institute‐Office of Cancer Survivorship. (2022). Definitions: Survivorship terms. Retrieved July 20, 2023, from https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/definitions. NVivo Transcription. Retrieved July 20, 2023, from https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo‐qualitative‐data‐analysis‐software/about/nvivo/modules/transcription. Pieters, H. C., & Heilemann, M. V. (2011). “Once you're 82 going on 83, surviving has a different meaning”: Older breast cancer survivors reflect on cancer survivorship. Cancer Nursing, 34(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181ef77b5. Raphael, D., Frey, R., & Gott, M. (2019). The nature and timing of distress among post‐treatment haematological cancer survivors. European Journal of Cancer Care, 28(1), e12951. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12951. Rogers, M. E. (1988). Nursing science and art: A prospective. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1(3), 99–102. Schroyen, S., Missotten, P., Jerusalem, G., Gilles, C., & Adam, S. (2016). Ageism and caring attitudes among nurses in oncology. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(5), 749–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610215001970. Sedrak, M. S., Freedman, R. A., Cohen, H. J., Muss, H. B., Jatoi, A., Klepin, H. D., Wildes, T. M., le‐Rademacher, J. G., Kimmick, G. G., Tew, W. P., George, K., Padam, S., Liu, J., Wong, A. R., Lynch, A., Djulbegovic, B., Mohile, S. G., Dale, W., & the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG). (2021). Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21638. Sherman, D. W., Rosedale, M., & Haber, J. (2012). Reclaiming life on one's own terms: A grounded theory study of the process of breast cancer survivorship. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39(3), E258–E268. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E., & Jemal, A. (2022). Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 72(1), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708. Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. (2008). Receiving bad news: A phenomenological exploration of the lived experience of receiving a cancer diagnosis. Cancer Nursing, 31(5), E31–E39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000305767.42475.7a. Tong, A., Craig, J., & Sainsbury, P. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32‐item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Towsley, G. L., Beck, S. L., & Watkins, J. F. (2007). “Learning to live with it”: Coping with the transition to cancer survivorship in older adults. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2006.08.003. Williams, S. (2000). Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(1), 40–67. Willis, D. G., Grace, P. J., & Roy, C. (2008). A central unifying focus for the discipline: Facilitating humanization, meaning, choice, quality of life, and healing in living and dying. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(1), E28–E40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ANS.0000311534.04059.d9. Zoom Video Communications Inc. HIPPA Compliance guide. https://zoom.us/docs/doc/Zoom‐hipaa.pdf. |
| Grant Information: | Stony Brook Foundation |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: blood cancers; cancer survivors; grounded theory; older adults; sense of self; survivorship; transition |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20240423 Date Completed: 20241213 Latest Revision: 20241213 |
| Update Code: | 20250114 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jan.16200 |
| PMID: | 38651679 |
| Databáza: | MEDLINE |
| Abstrakt: | Aim: To develop a theoretical understanding of the transition to survivorship in older adult blood cancer survivors.<br />Design: Qualitative research employing Classic Glaserian Grounded Theory methods.<br />Methods: Purposive and theoretical sampling recruited 17 participants via Leukaemia & Lymphoma Society© Community webpages (65-83 years) from across the US and Canada. Data from individual semi-structured interviews using HIPPA-compliant Zoom© were analysed from September 2020 to March 2021.<br />Results: Participants' main concern was losing their sense of self and reclaiming self was the core category. The substantive theory of Reclaiming Self-Balancing on a Tightrope Across Time is a six-phase transition process to survivorship: receiving a blood cancer diagnosis, finding bearings, reclaiming self, persevering through, realizing a transition and living in a new reality.<br />Conclusions: The transition to survivorship in older adult blood cancer survivors is a complex process because of age and disease type.<br />Implications: Age-related aspects of one's sense of self and its relation to health, well-being and quality of life, as older adult blood cancer survivors advance into older age need further research. Ageism and its impact on cancer survivorship care in older adults should also be explored.<br />Impact: What problem did the study address?: Existing theoretical frameworks do not explain the complex process of transition to survivorship for older adult blood cancer survivors. What were the main findings?: A substantive theory Reclaiming Self-Balancing on a Tightrope Across Time is a six-phase transition process from cancer diagnosis to survivorship characterized by an uncertain and liminal nature. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: Understanding how older adults experience the transition to survivorship can inform age-appropriate person-centered nursing practices and healthcare policies specific to their needs.<br />Reporting Method: COREQ.<br />Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.<br /> (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1365-2648 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jan.16200 |
Full Text Finder
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science