Investigation of port intervention to coastal and nearshore dynamics: a GIS and AHP approach.
Saved in:
| Title: | Investigation of port intervention to coastal and nearshore dynamics: a GIS and AHP approach. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | R M; National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM), Anna University Campus, MoEF&CC, Chennai, India. madhumithageo@gmail.com., S R; National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM), Anna University Campus, MoEF&CC, Chennai, India., B D; National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM), Anna University Campus, MoEF&CC, Chennai, India. |
| Source: | Environmental monitoring and assessment [Environ Monit Assess] 2024 Feb 29; Vol. 196 (3), pp. 322. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 29. |
| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Journal Info: | Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 8508350 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-2959 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01676369 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Monit Assess Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Publication: 1998- : Dordrecht : Springer Original Publication: Dordrecht, Holland ; Boston : D. Reidel Pub. Co., c1981- |
| MeSH Terms: | Analytic Hierarchy Process* , Cyclonic Storms*, Geographic Information Systems ; Environmental Monitoring |
| Abstract: | The goal of the study was attempted to understand the impact of selected ports on the coastal and nearshore dynamics. Dwelling activities along the coastal zone were particularly high in the last two decades. Hence, ports constructed between 2000 and 2022 such as Mundra, Hazira, Karaikal, Krishnapatnam, Gangavaram, and Gopalpur were considered for the study. The land and shore dynamics were assessed prior and after their construction. The landward impact was identified by the changes in LULC, and the dynamics of coastal sediments were assessed from numerical model before and after the ports' construction. The highly impacted land and shore features were used in analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to assess the extent of their impact due to port construction. The extent of impacts was indicated as "criteria weight (CW)" expressed as percentage. Village-wise local sensitivity analysis (LSA) of the port environs due to port activities was also assessed with six parameters such as changes in LULC, cyclone, population, road network, cultural heritage site and shore stability based on their influence on the coast on case-by-case basis using AHP. The obtained influence of the impact of these parameters was used to determine the category of local sensitivity of the adjacent villages around the ports. For effective management planning, the LSA was classified into five classes, namely, very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Villages categorized with different sensitivities can be attempted for suitable management plans and similar studies can be attempted for all villages impacted by port interventions. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.) |
| References: | Anitha, P., & Usha, N. (2015). Coastal vulnerability assessment: A case study on erosion and coastal change along tuticorin, Gulf of Mannar. Natural Hazards, 75, 1713–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1394-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s11069-014-1394-y) Balasubramanian, B. (2018). Challenges towards sustainable port development in India: The adverse effects of port development on coastal ecology and community in Ennore: a case study. Dissertations (p. 672). World Maritime University. Bureau, E.T. (2010, December 17). Mundra Port and SEZ destroying mangroves: MoEF. The economic times. Retrieved January 24, 2024, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/shipping-/-transport/mundra-port-sez-destroying-mangroves-moef/articleshow/7115223.cms?from=mdr. Census of India. (2011). Population data. http://censusindia.gov.in . Accessed 15 Jan 2023. Chauhan, H. B., & Shailesh, N. (2005). Land use/land cover changes near Hazira Region, Gujarat using remote sensing satellite data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33, 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990012. (PMID: 10.1007/BF02990012) Chou, L. M., Huang, D., Tan,K. S., Toh, T. C., Goh, B. P. L., & Tun, T. (2019). Chapter 24 – Singapore. In C. Sheppard (Ed.), World seas: An environmental evaluation volume II: Indian Ocean to the Pacific (2nd ed., pp. 539–558). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780081008539000312 . Accessed 6 Feb 2023. Cyclone Data. (2000 – 2022). Indian meteorological department. https://mausam.imd.gov.in . Accessed 10 Feb 2022. del Saz-Salazar, S., García-Menéndez, L., & Merk, O. (2013). The port and its environment: Methodological approach for economic appraisal. In OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2013/24. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3v1dvb1dd2-en. DHI Report (2017). Mike 21 & Mike 3 flow model FM - Sand transport module. Short description. Retrieved February 24, 2023, from https://www.mikepoweredbydhi.com/-/media/shared%20content/mike%20by%20dhi/flyers%20and%20pdf/product-documentation/short%20descriptions/mike213_st_fm_short_description.pdf. Dong, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, L., Gu, Y., & Sutrisno, D. (2023). Intensive land –use is associated with development status in port cities of Southeast Asia. Environmental Research Letters, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acc2d2. EIA Report (2015). Environmental impact assessment, environmental management plan and risk assessment for the development of bulk liquid berth for handling LNG at Karaikal Port. Indomer Coastal Hydraulics (P) LTD. Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://dste.py.gov.in/sites/default/files/karaikalportdrafteia.pdf. EIA Report. (2016). Marine environmental impact assessment study for shore-based wind power project at Mundra, Gujarat for Adani green energy limited Gujarat. Indomer Coastal Hydraulics (P) LTD. Project code. 499121314, March 2016. Franzen, M. O., Fernandes, E. H. L., & Siegle, E. (2021). Impacts of coastal structures on hydro-morphodynamic patterns and guidelines towards sustainable coastal development: A case studies review. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 44, 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101800. (PMID: 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101800) García-Ayllón, S., Gómez, F., & Bianco, F. (2022). Analysis of the spatial correlation between port areas configuration and alterations of the coastal shoreline: A multidisciplinary approach using spatiotemporal GIS indicators. Land (MDPI), 11, 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101800. (PMID: 10.3390/land11101800) GOI. (2016). Final report for Sagarmala. Ministry of Shipping, Indian Ports Association, November 2016, (Vol. II). Retrieved from 20170104_Sagarmala_final report_volume_02_1.pdf. GOI. (2018). Ministry of ports, shipping and waterways. Sagarmala port-led prosperity. Retrieved January 4, 2023, from http://sagarmala.gov.in/about-sagarmala/vision. Gopalpur Port inks pact with Odisha govt for land. (2023, September 17). The New Indian Express. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/odisha/2023/Sep/17/gopalpur-port-inks-pact-with-odisha-govt-for-land-2615719.html. Govindu, V., & Hadgu, K. M. (2012). Land use/ land cover changes through the applications of GIS and remote sensing and the implications on sustainable land management. International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2(2), 136–147. http://www.cibtech.org/jgee.htm. IBEF. (2018). Shipping Industry & Ports in India. The cargo handling capacity at the 12 major ports of India increased from 871 million metric tonnes (MMT) in 2015 to 1617 MMT in 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2023, from https://www.ibef.org/industry/ports-india-shipping.aspx. Jayaraju, N., Sundara Raja Reddy, B. C., & Reppeppa Reddy, K. (2010). Impact of dredging on sediment of Krishnapatnam port, east coast of India: Implications for marine biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281373114. Kajal, J., & Nishith, D. (2018). Monitoring of Mundra coastal zone, Gulf of Kachchh with reference to land use land cover changes using Remote Sensing and GIS. Life Sciences Leoflets, 100(2018), pp 43–52. https://petsd.org/ojs/index.php/lifesciencesleaflets/article/view/1251/1132. Kaliraj, S., Chandrasekar, N., Ramachandran, K. K., Srinivas, Y., & Saravanan, S. (2017). Coastal landuse and land cover change and transformations of Kanyakumari coast, India using remote sensing and GIS. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 20(2), 169–185. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.04.003) Kankara, R. S., Ramana Murthy, M. V., & Rajeevan, M. (2018). National assessment of shoreline changes along Indian Coast. Ministry of Earth Sciences, NCCR Report. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326696903 . Accessed 4 Feb 2024. Kudale, M. D. (2010). Impact of port development on the coastline and the need for protection. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, 39(4), 597–604. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293136453 . Accessed 22 Jan 2023. Mayer-Pinto, M., Johnston, E. L., Hutchings, P. A., Marzinelli, E. M., Ahyong, S. T., Birch, G., Booth, D. J., Creese, R. G., Doblin, M. A., Figueira, W., Gribben, P. E., Pritchard, T., Roughan, M., Steinberg, P. D., & Hedge, L. H. (2015). Sydney Harbour: A review of anthropogenic impacts on the biodiversity and ecosystem function of one of the world’s largest natural harbours. Marine and Freshwater Research, 66, 1088–1105. (PMID: 10.1071/MF15157) Mohanty, P. K., Barik, S. K., Kar, P. K., Behera, B., & Mishra, P. (2015). Impacts of ports on shoreline change along Odisha coast. Procedia Engineering, 116, 647–654. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705815019943 . Accessed 20 Feb 2023. Peris-Mora, E., Diez Orejas, J. M., Subirats, A., Ibánez, S., & Alvarez, P. (2005). Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 1649–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.048. (PMID: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.04816095626) Prakash, N., Ashly, K. U., Seelam, J. K., Bhaskaran, H., Yadhunath, E. M., Lavanya, H., Krishnan, R., Surisetty, A. K., & V.V. (2021). Investigation of near-shore processes along North Goa beaches: A study based on Beld observations and numerical modelling. Journal of Earth System Science, 130, 242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-021-01755-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s12040-021-01755-3) Pranbihanga Borpuzari (2022). Container port: Middle East container ports most efficient in the world, India’s Pipavav ranked at 26 - The Economic Times (indiatimes.com) - May 26 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/trade/exports/insights/middle-east-container-ports-most-efficient-in-the-world-indias-pipavav-ranked-at-26/articleshow/91803884.cms. Proceedings of the public hearing conducted at the multipurpose hall, Karaikal. (2016, October 26). The proposed project of handling of LNG, at m/s. karaikal port pvt. ltd., karaikal. Retrieved January 16, 2024, from https://dste.py.gov.in/ppcc/pdf/publichearing/kkl/. Rajakumari, S., Meenambikai, M., Divya, V., Sarunjith, K. J., & Rmaesh, R. (2021). Morphological changes in alluvial and coastal plains of Kandaleru river, Andhra Pradesh using RS and GIS. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 24(3), Part 2. Ramasubramanian, R., Ravishankar, T., & Nalini Mohan, D. (2018). Conservation and management of mangrove wetlands of Andhra Pradesh for combating the impacts of climate change. Mangroves and Climate change. Rutam, V. V. (2013, September 4). Adani’s Mundra port fined for breach of environment norms. Business Standard. Retrieved January 24, 2024, from https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/adani-s-mundra-port-fined-for-breach-of-environment-norms-113090300383_1.html. Saaty, L. Thomas (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022249677900335 . Accessed 6 Jun 2023. Sarma, K. G. S. (2015). Siltation and coastal erosion at shoreline harbours. Procedia Engineering, 116, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.259. (PMID: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.259) Sun, B., & Kauzen, R. (2023). The impact of port infrastructure and economic growth in Tanzania: Adopting a structural equation modeling approach. SAGE Journals, 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221145894. Timmermans, M. C. J. (2002). Hazira harbour siltation study: A new harbour in the Gulf of Khambhat, India. TU Delft, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Hydraulic Engineering – master thesis. Wang, X. H., & Andutta, F. P. (2013). Sediment transport dynamics in ports, estuaries and other coastal environments. In A. J. Manning (Ed.), Sediment transport – processes and their modelling application. https://doi.org/10.5772/3401. Wibowo, M., Hendriyono, W., Rahman, R. A., Susatijo, G., Kongko, W., Istiyanto, D. C., Widagdo, A. B., Nugroho, S., Khoirunnisa, H., Wiguna, E., Aziz, H., & Santoso, B. (2020). Sediment transport modelling at Jelitik Estuary, Sungailiat – Bangka Regency for the design of sediment control structures. Journal of Physics, Conference Series, 1625(2020), 012042. (PMID: 10.1088/1742-6596/1625/1/012042) Yan, J., Xiao, R., Su, F., Bai, J., & Jia, F. (2021). Impact of port construction on the spatial pattern of land use in coastal zones based on CLDI and LUT models: A case study of Qingdao and Yantai. Remote Sens., 13(16), 3110. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163110. (PMID: 10.3390/rs13163110) Zilinskas, G., Janusaite, R., Jarmalavicius, D., & Pupienis, D. (2020). The impact of Klaipeda port entrance channel dredging on the dynamics of coastal zone. Lithuania. Oceanologia., 62(4A), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2020.08.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.oceano.2020.08.002) |
| Contributed Indexing: | Keywords: AHP; LSA; MLC; Port impact |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20240229 Date Completed: 20240301 Latest Revision: 20240312 |
| Update Code: | 20250114 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10661-024-12472-x |
| PMID: | 38421475 |
| Database: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstract: | The goal of the study was attempted to understand the impact of selected ports on the coastal and nearshore dynamics. Dwelling activities along the coastal zone were particularly high in the last two decades. Hence, ports constructed between 2000 and 2022 such as Mundra, Hazira, Karaikal, Krishnapatnam, Gangavaram, and Gopalpur were considered for the study. The land and shore dynamics were assessed prior and after their construction. The landward impact was identified by the changes in LULC, and the dynamics of coastal sediments were assessed from numerical model before and after the ports' construction. The highly impacted land and shore features were used in analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to assess the extent of their impact due to port construction. The extent of impacts was indicated as "criteria weight (CW)" expressed as percentage. Village-wise local sensitivity analysis (LSA) of the port environs due to port activities was also assessed with six parameters such as changes in LULC, cyclone, population, road network, cultural heritage site and shore stability based on their influence on the coast on case-by-case basis using AHP. The obtained influence of the impact of these parameters was used to determine the category of local sensitivity of the adjacent villages around the ports. For effective management planning, the LSA was classified into five classes, namely, very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Villages categorized with different sensitivities can be attempted for suitable management plans and similar studies can be attempted for all villages impacted by port interventions.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.) |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-2959 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10661-024-12472-x |