Evaluation of the effectiveness of the California mosquito-borne virus surveillance & response plan, 2009-2018.
Uloženo v:
| Název: | Evaluation of the effectiveness of the California mosquito-borne virus surveillance & response plan, 2009-2018. |
|---|---|
| Autoři: | Danforth ME; Vector-Borne Disease Section, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, United States of America., Snyder RE; Vector-Borne Disease Section, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, United States of America., Lonstrup ETN; Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America., Barker CM; Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America., Kramer VL; Vector-Borne Disease Section, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, United States of America. |
| Zdroj: | PLoS neglected tropical diseases [PLoS Negl Trop Dis] 2022 May 09; Vol. 16 (5), pp. e0010375. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 09 (Print Publication: 2022). |
| Způsob vydávání: | Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Informace o časopise: | Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101291488 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1935-2735 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19352727 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Subsets: MEDLINE |
| Imprint Name(s): | Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science |
| Výrazy ze slovníku MeSH: | Culex* , Culicidae* , Encephalitis Virus, California* , West Nile Fever*/epidemiology , West Nile Fever*/prevention & control , West Nile virus*/physiology, Animals ; California/epidemiology ; Chickens ; Mosquito Vectors |
| Abstrakt: | Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Local vector control and public health agencies in California use the California Mosquito-Borne Virus Surveillance and Response Plan to monitor and evaluate West Nile virus (WNV) activity and guide responses to reduce the burden of WNV disease. All available data from environmental surveillance, such as the abundance and WNV infection rates in Culex tarsalis and the Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes, the numbers of dead birds, seroconversions in sentinel chickens, and ambient air temperatures, are fed into a formula to estimate the risk level and associated risk of human infections. In many other areas of the US, the vector index, based only on vector mosquito abundance and infection rates, is used by vector control programs to estimate the risk of human WNV transmission. We built models to determine the association between risk level and the number of reported symptomatic human disease cases with onset in the following three weeks to identify the essential components of the risk level and to compare California's risk estimates to vector index. Risk level calculations based on Cx. tarsalis and Cx. pipiens complex levels were significantly associated with increased human risk, particularly when accounting for vector control area and population, and were better predictors than using vector index. Including all potential environmental components created an effective tool to estimate the risk of WNV transmission to humans in California. |
| References: | Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008 Spring;8(1):35-9. (PMID: 18237264) Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015 Feb;15(2):147-55. (PMID: 25700046) Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Aug;10(8):1369-78. (PMID: 15496236) Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):441-447. (PMID: 32525967) Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 15;44(12):1617-24. (PMID: 17516407) Viruses. 2019 Sep 05;11(9):. (PMID: 31491885) JAMA. 2013 Jul 17;310(3):297-307. (PMID: 23860988) Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Dec;8(12):1385-91. (PMID: 12498652) Lancet. 2001 Jul 28;358(9278):261-4. (PMID: 11498211) J Med Entomol. 2006 Mar;43(2):356-67. (PMID: 16619622) Rev Med Virol. 2006 Jul-Aug;16(4):209-24. (PMID: 16906589) Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;18(8):1298-306. (PMID: 22840314) J Med Entomol. 2006 Mar;43(2):309-17. (PMID: 16619616) J Med Entomol. 2009 Nov;46(6):1519-31. (PMID: 19960707) Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Dec;89(6):1154-1167. (PMID: 23958909) J Med Entomol. 2016 May;53(3):681-686. (PMID: 27026160) Immunotherapy. 2011 Feb;3(2):269-85. (PMID: 21322763) PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Nov 18;14(11):e0008841. (PMID: 33206634) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 09;68(31):673-678. (PMID: 31393865) J Med Entomol. 2019 Oct 28;56(6):1475-1490. (PMID: 31549725) J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2011 Sep;27(3):315-9. (PMID: 22017098) J Med Entomol. 2015 Sep;52(5):1083-9. (PMID: 26336222) Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Mar;16(3):480-6. (PMID: 20202424) J Med Entomol. 2014 Jan;51(1):55-62. (PMID: 24605453) J Wildl Dis. 2015 Jul;51(3):576-88. (PMID: 25919466) Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Mar;78(3):434-41. (PMID: 18337340) J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2013 Jun;29(2):123-32. (PMID: 23923326) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 May 04;67(17):496-501. (PMID: 29723166) Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):747-54. (PMID: 18439356) Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Mar;141(3):591-5. (PMID: 22640592) MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Apr 2;59(2):1-17. (PMID: 20360671) Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003 May;68(5):508-18. (PMID: 12812335) Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Aug;17(8):1445-54. (PMID: 21801622) Viruses. 2013 Sep 04;5(9):2079-105. (PMID: 24008376) Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):620-627. (PMID: 34077676) Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 May;86(5):884-94. (PMID: 22556092) |
| Grant Information: | U01 CK000516 United States CK NCEZID CDC HHS |
| Entry Date(s): | Date Created: 20220509 Date Completed: 20220523 Latest Revision: 20220930 |
| Update Code: | 20250114 |
| PubMed Central ID: | PMC9119623 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010375 |
| PMID: | 35533207 |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Full Text 
Full Text Finder 
Nájsť tento článok vo Web of Science | Abstrakt: | Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.<br />Local vector control and public health agencies in California use the California Mosquito-Borne Virus Surveillance and Response Plan to monitor and evaluate West Nile virus (WNV) activity and guide responses to reduce the burden of WNV disease. All available data from environmental surveillance, such as the abundance and WNV infection rates in Culex tarsalis and the Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes, the numbers of dead birds, seroconversions in sentinel chickens, and ambient air temperatures, are fed into a formula to estimate the risk level and associated risk of human infections. In many other areas of the US, the vector index, based only on vector mosquito abundance and infection rates, is used by vector control programs to estimate the risk of human WNV transmission. We built models to determine the association between risk level and the number of reported symptomatic human disease cases with onset in the following three weeks to identify the essential components of the risk level and to compare California's risk estimates to vector index. Risk level calculations based on Cx. tarsalis and Cx. pipiens complex levels were significantly associated with increased human risk, particularly when accounting for vector control area and population, and were better predictors than using vector index. Including all potential environmental components created an effective tool to estimate the risk of WNV transmission to humans in California. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1935-2735 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010375 |