View in EDS

Challenges of workforce diversity uptake in the construction industry: a mixed review approach.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Challenges of workforce diversity uptake in the construction industry: a mixed review approach.
Authors: Owusu-Boadi, Juliet1 (AUTHOR) owusuboadi.j@gmail.com, Kissi, Ernest1,2 (AUTHOR) kisernest@gmail.com, Abu, Ivy Maame1 (AUTHOR) ivy.abu@gmail.com, Owusu, Cecilia Dapaah1 (AUTHOR) kyerewaahc19@gmail.com, Baiden, Bernard K.1 (AUTHOR) bkb.knust@gmail.com, Eluerkeh, Kenneth1 (AUTHOR) kennetheluerkeh22@gmail.com, Opoku Ware, Stephen Nana1 (AUTHOR) stephennana.nana@gmail.com
Source: Engineering Construction & Architectural Management (09699988). 2025, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p7622-7650. 29p.
Subject Terms: *DIVERSITY in the workplace, *CONSTRUCTION industry, *ECONOMIC development, CONTENT analysis, SOCIOLOGY, EVALUATION methodology, ORGANIZATION management
Abstract: Purpose: Workforce diversity is essential for success from the perspectives of economic development and intellectual property. However, the construction industry is losing out on these gains due to the low diversity among them. The study aims to identify challenges impeding workforce diversity in construction literature through a mixed review approach. Design/methodology/approach: The study desk reviewed 188 relevant construction peer-reviewed articles and conference papers with no restrictions on the time range. The study adopted the mixed methodology review approach through bibliometric and systematic content analyses. Findings: The study identified 67 challenges and further classified them into 4 broad categories. These were industry-related, organisational-, personal or attitudinal- and health-related challenges. Organisational challenges were the most prevalent challenges of diversity uptake in the construction industry. The publications' most influential sources, countries/regions and annual trends were also discussed. Practical implications: Classifying the challenges hindering diversity contributes to the existing knowledge base. The framework's interrelationships among categorised barriers will enable construction professionals to make informed decisions in promoting diversity in the industry. Originality/value: This study has a broad geographical reach, allowing the findings to be widely applicable to the diverse practice of the worldwide construction sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Engineering Construction & Architectural Management (09699988) is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
Abstract:Purpose: Workforce diversity is essential for success from the perspectives of economic development and intellectual property. However, the construction industry is losing out on these gains due to the low diversity among them. The study aims to identify challenges impeding workforce diversity in construction literature through a mixed review approach. Design/methodology/approach: The study desk reviewed 188 relevant construction peer-reviewed articles and conference papers with no restrictions on the time range. The study adopted the mixed methodology review approach through bibliometric and systematic content analyses. Findings: The study identified 67 challenges and further classified them into 4 broad categories. These were industry-related, organisational-, personal or attitudinal- and health-related challenges. Organisational challenges were the most prevalent challenges of diversity uptake in the construction industry. The publications' most influential sources, countries/regions and annual trends were also discussed. Practical implications: Classifying the challenges hindering diversity contributes to the existing knowledge base. The framework's interrelationships among categorised barriers will enable construction professionals to make informed decisions in promoting diversity in the industry. Originality/value: This study has a broad geographical reach, allowing the findings to be widely applicable to the diverse practice of the worldwide construction sector. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09699988
DOI:10.1108/ECAM-02-2024-0216