View in EDS

Alive and kicking or barely alive? The asymmetry thesis in the twenty-first century EU.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Alive and kicking or barely alive? The asymmetry thesis in the twenty-first century EU.
Authors: van den Brink, Martijn1 (AUTHOR), Dawson, Mark2 (AUTHOR) dawson@hertie-school.org, Zglinski, Jan3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of European Public Policy. Nov2025, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p2608-2619. 12p.
Subject Terms: EUROPEAN integration, LEGAL norms, INTERDISCIPLINARY research, THEORISTS
Company/Entity: EUROPEAN Union
Abstract: This paper focuses on the legal and institutional assumptions of Fritz Scharpf's famous thesis of an asymmetry between positive and negative integration in the EU. Taking issue with a number of arguments forwarded in the lead piece for this debate section, it questions the relevance of the thesis to the governance of the contemporary EU, objecting to (i) the limited falsifiability of the asymmetry thesis as established by the distinction between structure and agency; (ii) the emphasis of the thesis on the weakening influence of negative integration and (iii) the way in which asymmetry ignores the increasing centrality of positive integration to defining the EU's legal order. As the paper concludes, while the asymmetry thesis pioneered inter-disciplinary exploration of how the EU's legal and political order inter-relates, it needs serious re-thinking in the Europe of the 2020s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of European Public Policy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
Abstract:This paper focuses on the legal and institutional assumptions of Fritz Scharpf's famous thesis of an asymmetry between positive and negative integration in the EU. Taking issue with a number of arguments forwarded in the lead piece for this debate section, it questions the relevance of the thesis to the governance of the contemporary EU, objecting to (i) the limited falsifiability of the asymmetry thesis as established by the distinction between structure and agency; (ii) the emphasis of the thesis on the weakening influence of negative integration and (iii) the way in which asymmetry ignores the increasing centrality of positive integration to defining the EU's legal order. As the paper concludes, while the asymmetry thesis pioneered inter-disciplinary exploration of how the EU's legal and political order inter-relates, it needs serious re-thinking in the Europe of the 2020s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:13501763
DOI:10.1080/13501763.2025.2527330