In EDS ansehen

Understanding the defining characteristics of a high-quality conceptual article.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Understanding the defining characteristics of a high-quality conceptual article.
Autoren: Das, Kallol1 (AUTHOR) kallol.das@micamail.in, Mungra, Yogesh1 (AUTHOR) yogesh.mungra@micamail.in, Malhotra, Naresh K.2 (AUTHOR) naresh.malhotra@scheller.gatech.edu, Kumar, V.3 (AUTHOR) drvk44@gmail.com
Quelle: European Journal of Marketing. 2025, Vol. 59 Issue 10, p2375-2405. 31p.
Schlagwörter: *MARKETING research, *PRODUCT quality, EVALUATION methodology, CREATIVE ability, PERIODICAL articles, RESEARCH evaluation
Abstract: Purpose: This study aims to deepen the understanding regarding developing conceptual articles in marketing by addressing three important research questions (RQs): What is a high-quality conceptual article, and what are its dimensions and corresponding attributes? How should the quality of conceptual articles be assessed? What is the quality of conceptual articles published in marketing? Design/methodology/approach: To address RQ1, we examined the literature, sought input from experts and reviewed marketplace data. We used a triangulation approach to conceptualize conceptual article quality, its dimensions and their corresponding attributes. To address RQ2, we carefully developed a comprehensive rubric for measuring conceptual article quality. A well-developed rubric can have a higher diagnostic value than a multi-item scale, which makes this study more valuable. In response to RQ3, we content-analyzed 207 conceptual articles, sourced from five leading marketing journals for the period 2000–2017, and revealed that while the quality has been largely moderate, there is a promising upward trajectory, reflecting learning over time. Findings: The key finding of this article is a cc-rc-c framework of conceptual article quality. It is characterized by three dimensions, namely cc-quality (conceptual creativity), rc-quality (conceptual rigor) and c-quality (comprehensibility). A comprehensive rubric is also provided for evaluating the quality of conceptual articles. Research limitations/implications: This study did not examine analytical articles. Future researchers can identify and operationalize the attributes of analytical rigor toward understanding article quality. Likewise, to understand article quality in the case of empirical articles, scholars need to identify and operationalize empirical rigor (Kumar, 2016). It would also be interesting to know to what extent conceptual article quality explains article quality in the case of analytical and empirical articles. Future researchers can undertake studies using multiple methods to examine this issue thoroughly. Practical implications: The proposed framework and rubric will aid authors, journal editors/reviewers, educators and professional associations in collectively enhancing the quality of conceptual articles in marketing. Originality/value: This paper offers a framework and rubric for "conceptual article quality." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Journal of Marketing is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Business Source Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:Purpose: This study aims to deepen the understanding regarding developing conceptual articles in marketing by addressing three important research questions (RQs): What is a high-quality conceptual article, and what are its dimensions and corresponding attributes? How should the quality of conceptual articles be assessed? What is the quality of conceptual articles published in marketing? Design/methodology/approach: To address RQ1, we examined the literature, sought input from experts and reviewed marketplace data. We used a triangulation approach to conceptualize conceptual article quality, its dimensions and their corresponding attributes. To address RQ2, we carefully developed a comprehensive rubric for measuring conceptual article quality. A well-developed rubric can have a higher diagnostic value than a multi-item scale, which makes this study more valuable. In response to RQ3, we content-analyzed 207 conceptual articles, sourced from five leading marketing journals for the period 2000–2017, and revealed that while the quality has been largely moderate, there is a promising upward trajectory, reflecting learning over time. Findings: The key finding of this article is a cc-rc-c framework of conceptual article quality. It is characterized by three dimensions, namely cc-quality (conceptual creativity), rc-quality (conceptual rigor) and c-quality (comprehensibility). A comprehensive rubric is also provided for evaluating the quality of conceptual articles. Research limitations/implications: This study did not examine analytical articles. Future researchers can identify and operationalize the attributes of analytical rigor toward understanding article quality. Likewise, to understand article quality in the case of empirical articles, scholars need to identify and operationalize empirical rigor (Kumar, 2016). It would also be interesting to know to what extent conceptual article quality explains article quality in the case of analytical and empirical articles. Future researchers can undertake studies using multiple methods to examine this issue thoroughly. Practical implications: The proposed framework and rubric will aid authors, journal editors/reviewers, educators and professional associations in collectively enhancing the quality of conceptual articles in marketing. Originality/value: This paper offers a framework and rubric for "conceptual article quality." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03090566
DOI:10.1108/EJM-04-2025-0301