View in EDS

Ties That Bind: Tied Aid and Economic Growth.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Ties That Bind: Tied Aid and Economic Growth.
Authors: Ganga, Paula1 (AUTHOR) pdg12@duke.edu
Source: Studies in Comparative International Development. Sep2025, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p613-631. 19p.
Subject Terms: *LETTING of contracts, *INTERNATIONAL economic assistance, *ECONOMIC expansion, *EMPIRICAL research, DEVELOPING countries
Abstract: Donors tie large amounts of foreign aid, forcing recipients to buy from donor countries. Scholars and the OECD have long argued that, by not permitting recipients to procure locally or to participate in internationally competitive bidding practices, tied aid creates inefficiencies that undermine economic growth. Furthermore, tied aid may be less effective than untied aid because it serves donor companies more than it targets recipient needs. Despite the academic, policy, and media attention on tied aid, there is little empirical study of whether it is worse for growth than untied aid. Using the latest econometric techniques to account for potential endogeneity, we present and analyze new data on tied aid covering 157 countries across the Global South (1990–2018). We find that tied aid is, indeed, associated with less growth than untied aid and suggest that donors interested in development should not tie aid. We conclude with directions for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Studies in Comparative International Development is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
Abstract:Donors tie large amounts of foreign aid, forcing recipients to buy from donor countries. Scholars and the OECD have long argued that, by not permitting recipients to procure locally or to participate in internationally competitive bidding practices, tied aid creates inefficiencies that undermine economic growth. Furthermore, tied aid may be less effective than untied aid because it serves donor companies more than it targets recipient needs. Despite the academic, policy, and media attention on tied aid, there is little empirical study of whether it is worse for growth than untied aid. Using the latest econometric techniques to account for potential endogeneity, we present and analyze new data on tied aid covering 157 countries across the Global South (1990–2018). We find that tied aid is, indeed, associated with less growth than untied aid and suggest that donors interested in development should not tie aid. We conclude with directions for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00393606
DOI:10.1007/s12116-024-09432-4