View in EDS

Hieroglyphs, or science fiction icons and the rate and direction of innovation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Hieroglyphs, or science fiction icons and the rate and direction of innovation.
Authors: Koss Hartmann, Rasmus1 (AUTHOR) rkh.msc@cbs.dk
Source: Innovation: Organization & Management. Nov2025, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p503-519. 17p.
Subject Terms: *TECHNOLOGICAL innovations, *INNOVATION adoption, *INNOVATION management, SCIENCE fiction, FUTUROLOGISTS, SCHOLARLY method, HIEROGLYPHICS
Abstract: It is striking just how large a role science fiction plays in contemporary processes of innovation and technological change and how comparatively little attention this role has received in innovation scholarship. What little research exists on the issue has been based on hypotheses that science fiction envisions technological futures, inspires technological innovation, or shapes the supply of innovators. I explore an alternative hypothesis. Science fictional ideas can also function as hieroglyphs. Following the work of Neal Stephenson, a hieroglyph is an iconic idea, a simple and recognizable symbol with an agreed-upon significance. Hieroglyphs can be drawn from literature (e.g., robots as described by Isaac Asimov or cyberspace as described by William Gibson), film (e.g., rogue AI from 2001: Space Odyssey), series (e.g., intergalactic space travel from Star Trek) or other sources. Such hieroglyphs can influence the rate and direction of innovation through at least four mechanisms. At the individual level, hieroglyphs can serve to frame technology adopters' understandings and to focus technology developers' attention, thus shaping the direction of innovation. At the level of organizations and field, hieroglyphs can coordinate technology developers' activities within and across organizations and corroborate narratives of technological opportunities, thus shaping the rate of innovation. I suggest ways that future empirical scholarship might explore these mechanisms, and I propose how these mechanisms, if borne out empirically, might invite some reconsiderations of especially innovation management pedagogy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Innovation: Organization & Management is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
Abstract:It is striking just how large a role science fiction plays in contemporary processes of innovation and technological change and how comparatively little attention this role has received in innovation scholarship. What little research exists on the issue has been based on hypotheses that science fiction envisions technological futures, inspires technological innovation, or shapes the supply of innovators. I explore an alternative hypothesis. Science fictional ideas can also function as hieroglyphs. Following the work of Neal Stephenson, a hieroglyph is an iconic idea, a simple and recognizable symbol with an agreed-upon significance. Hieroglyphs can be drawn from literature (e.g., robots as described by Isaac Asimov or cyberspace as described by William Gibson), film (e.g., rogue AI from 2001: Space Odyssey), series (e.g., intergalactic space travel from Star Trek) or other sources. Such hieroglyphs can influence the rate and direction of innovation through at least four mechanisms. At the individual level, hieroglyphs can serve to frame technology adopters' understandings and to focus technology developers' attention, thus shaping the direction of innovation. At the level of organizations and field, hieroglyphs can coordinate technology developers' activities within and across organizations and corroborate narratives of technological opportunities, thus shaping the rate of innovation. I suggest ways that future empirical scholarship might explore these mechanisms, and I propose how these mechanisms, if borne out empirically, might invite some reconsiderations of especially innovation management pedagogy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:14479338
DOI:10.1080/14479338.2024.2442303