中国森林生态补偿政策实施效果 ———基于 CNKI 等数据库的文献分析.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: 中国森林生态补偿政策实施效果 ———基于 CNKI 等数据库的文献分析.
Alternate Title: Implementation Effects of China's Forest Ecological Compensation Policy ———Literature Analysis from CNKI and other databases.
Authors: 刘会芳1,2, 苏晓丫1,2, 关家欣2, 张 寒1,2
Source: China Forestry Economy. aug2025, Issue 4, p21-30. 10p.
Subject Terms: *ECONOMIC development, *REFORMS, ECOSYSTEM services, CARBON sequestration, SPATIOTEMPORAL processes, PROGRAM effectiveness (Education), PAYMENTS for ecosystem services, GEOSPATIAL data
Geographic Terms: CHINA
Abstract (English): Forest ecological compensation (FEC) policies serve as a critical instrument to reconcile ecological preservation with economic growth, enhancing ecosystem service value ( ESV) and facilitating industrial restructuring. However, existing research remains largely theoretical, with limited quantitative assessment of policy efficacy, insufficient cross-regional comparative analysis, and inadequate analysis of spatiotemporal variations in multidimensional outcomes. This study systematically analyzes 206 peer-reviewed articles ( 1988—2024) from the CNKI and Wan fang databases using Cite Space, constructing a tripartite framework encompassing ecosystem services, policy tools, and performance evaluation. Key findings reveal that FEC policies significantly elevate ESV ( e. g., pronounced carbon sequestration benefits in high-latitude regions ) and optimize economic structures by promoting non-agricultural labor transfer and income diversification. Yet regional heterogeneity persists: particularly in ecologically fragile western China where outcomes remain suboptimal due to mismatches between compensation standards and restoration costs. To address these disparities, we propose institutional innovations, such as cross-regional coordination mechanisms, standardized ecological valuation protocols, and digital monitoring systems, to improve policy precision and long-term sustainability [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Chinese): 森林生态补偿是平衡生态保护与经济发展的重要政策工具, 对提升生态系统服务价值与优化产业 结构具有关键作用。 现有研究多停留于理论层面, 缺乏政策效果的量化测度与跨区域对比分析, 且对多维效果 时空分异规律的解构不足。 基于中国知网 (CNKI) 与万方数据库, 运用 CiteSpace 对筛选的 1988—2024 年 206 篇文献进行系统分析, 构建生态系统服务、政策工具与绩效评估三维框架。 结果表明: 政策显著提升生态服务 价值 (如高纬度地区固碳效益突出) 并优化经济结构 (促进劳动力非农转移与收入多元化),但存在区域异质 性———西部生态脆弱区受限于补偿标准与修复成本失衡。 据此提出构建跨区域协同机制, 推进生态价值核算 标准化与数字化监测体系, 以增强政策精准性与可持续性 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of China Forestry Economy is the property of China Forestry Economy Magazine Agency and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
Abstract:Forest ecological compensation (FEC) policies serve as a critical instrument to reconcile ecological preservation with economic growth, enhancing ecosystem service value ( ESV) and facilitating industrial restructuring. However, existing research remains largely theoretical, with limited quantitative assessment of policy efficacy, insufficient cross-regional comparative analysis, and inadequate analysis of spatiotemporal variations in multidimensional outcomes. This study systematically analyzes 206 peer-reviewed articles ( 1988—2024) from the CNKI and Wan fang databases using Cite Space, constructing a tripartite framework encompassing ecosystem services, policy tools, and performance evaluation. Key findings reveal that FEC policies significantly elevate ESV ( e. g., pronounced carbon sequestration benefits in high-latitude regions ) and optimize economic structures by promoting non-agricultural labor transfer and income diversification. Yet regional heterogeneity persists: particularly in ecologically fragile western China where outcomes remain suboptimal due to mismatches between compensation standards and restoration costs. To address these disparities, we propose institutional innovations, such as cross-regional coordination mechanisms, standardized ecological valuation protocols, and digital monitoring systems, to improve policy precision and long-term sustainability [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:16735919
DOI:10.13691/j.cnki.cn23-1539/f.2025.04.003