Zobraziť v EDS

'Blunt' tools for grievance management and the complexity of injustice: a case study of operational-level grievance mechanisms on South Africa's platinum belt.

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Názov: 'Blunt' tools for grievance management and the complexity of injustice: a case study of operational-level grievance mechanisms on South Africa's platinum belt.
Autori: Hofmeyr, Judy1 (AUTHOR) judy.hofmeyr@manchester.ac.uk
Zdroj: Resources Policy. Oct2025, Vol. 109, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Predmety: *GRIEVANCE procedures, *MINERAL industries, PLATINUM mining, SOCIAL injustice, LEGAL procedure, COMMUNITY involvement, APARTHEID
Geografický termín: LIMPOPO (South Africa), SOUTH Africa
Abstrakt: This article examines operational-level grievance mechanisms and claims for justice in mining territories. It draws on data collected in platinum-producing regions in Limpopo, South Africa, through interviews, observation and extensive engagement with mine representatives, aggrieved community members and other actors involved in efforts to address protracted issues in the area. By investigating both the intent of such mechanisms and the de facto processes by which issues are raised, expressed, and addressed in a single case study, it reveals the incompatibility of narrow, overly-simplified policies and the complex experiences of injustice – often ambiguous or illegible at first – that inform complaints and expectations for remedy in extractive locales. These 'blunt tools' for grievance management leave both employees implementing policies, and community actors urged to make use of it, frustrated and disempowered. In its shadow, parallel systems emerge to negotiate over issues. The study sheds light on the limitations of grievance procedures and on the inherent political nature of these quasi-adjudicative processes managed by private actors. The paper identifies the chronic under-resourcing of grievance mechanisms as a key policy gap, arguing that meaningful reform requires substantial investment in personnel, monitoring, and accessibility. • In the case study area, grievance procedures are known to narrow the access, scope, and outcome of claims for justice. • This maintains a barrier between the aggrieved and the mine's interests, and walls off alternative space for contestation. • De facto grievance management processes differ dramatically from written corporate policies. • Oversimplified grievance policies are often unsuitable for complex grievances, which leads to irremediability and delay. • In the shadow of blunt grievance policies, a deepening sense of injustice creates new 'repertoires of contention'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Resources Policy is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáza: Business Source Index
Popis
Abstrakt:This article examines operational-level grievance mechanisms and claims for justice in mining territories. It draws on data collected in platinum-producing regions in Limpopo, South Africa, through interviews, observation and extensive engagement with mine representatives, aggrieved community members and other actors involved in efforts to address protracted issues in the area. By investigating both the intent of such mechanisms and the de facto processes by which issues are raised, expressed, and addressed in a single case study, it reveals the incompatibility of narrow, overly-simplified policies and the complex experiences of injustice – often ambiguous or illegible at first – that inform complaints and expectations for remedy in extractive locales. These 'blunt tools' for grievance management leave both employees implementing policies, and community actors urged to make use of it, frustrated and disempowered. In its shadow, parallel systems emerge to negotiate over issues. The study sheds light on the limitations of grievance procedures and on the inherent political nature of these quasi-adjudicative processes managed by private actors. The paper identifies the chronic under-resourcing of grievance mechanisms as a key policy gap, arguing that meaningful reform requires substantial investment in personnel, monitoring, and accessibility. • In the case study area, grievance procedures are known to narrow the access, scope, and outcome of claims for justice. • This maintains a barrier between the aggrieved and the mine's interests, and walls off alternative space for contestation. • De facto grievance management processes differ dramatically from written corporate policies. • Oversimplified grievance policies are often unsuitable for complex grievances, which leads to irremediability and delay. • In the shadow of blunt grievance policies, a deepening sense of injustice creates new 'repertoires of contention'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03014207
DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105715