View in EDS

Colonial Rule and the Power of Chiefs over Land Resources.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Colonial Rule and the Power of Chiefs over Land Resources.
Authors: Shifa, Abdulaziz B.1 (AUTHOR) abshifa@maxwell.syr.edu
Source: Journal of Development Studies. Oct2025, Vol. 61 Issue 10, p1642-1659. 18p.
Subject Terms: *PROPERTY rights, *LEADERSHIP, LAND resource, COLONIAL administration, COUNTRIES, ENGLISH-speaking countries, POSTCOLONIALISM
Geographic Terms: AFRICA
Abstract: Property rights over land—a pivotal asset in developing countries—exhibit significant variations across economies. Nonetheless, the causes for such variations remain open empirical questions. We focus on colonial rule, as Africa's colonial history suggests that British rule may have entrenched the power of chiefs over land resources. Using micro-data, we find that chiefs in anglophone countries have greater authority in land allocation than their francophone counterparts. This result holds across various specifications, including discontinuity analysis focusing on observations near anglophone–francophone borders. This effect increases with the intensity of British indirect rule and with the formal recognition of chieftaincy by postcolonial states. The findings highlight the enduring impact of colonial rule on contemporary land institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Development Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Index
Description
Abstract:Property rights over land—a pivotal asset in developing countries—exhibit significant variations across economies. Nonetheless, the causes for such variations remain open empirical questions. We focus on colonial rule, as Africa's colonial history suggests that British rule may have entrenched the power of chiefs over land resources. Using micro-data, we find that chiefs in anglophone countries have greater authority in land allocation than their francophone counterparts. This result holds across various specifications, including discontinuity analysis focusing on observations near anglophone–francophone borders. This effect increases with the intensity of British indirect rule and with the formal recognition of chieftaincy by postcolonial states. The findings highlight the enduring impact of colonial rule on contemporary land institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00220388
DOI:10.1080/00220388.2025.2489555