In EDS ansehen

Boundary and Target Value-Based Normalization Procedures for MCDM Methods: An Application on Workers' Physical Workload Evaluation by Using CRITIC-PSI-CoCoSo.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Boundary and Target Value-Based Normalization Procedures for MCDM Methods: An Application on Workers' Physical Workload Evaluation by Using CRITIC-PSI-CoCoSo.
Autoren: Toktaş, Pelin1 (AUTHOR) ptoktas@baskent.edu.tr, Can, Gülin Feryal1 (AUTHOR), Delice, Elif Kılıç2 (AUTHOR)
Quelle: International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. Jul2025, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p1459-1491. 33p.
Schlagwörter: *MULTIPLE criteria decision making, *EMPLOYEES' workload, EVALUATORS, CALIBRATION
Abstract: It is important to perform to find the most appropriate normalization procedure in MCDM methods. Normalization procedures proposed in the literature have tended to focus on cost and benefit type criteria. Some of the criteria discussed in MCDM problems may be required not to exceed a certain lower bound or upper bound, while others may be required to meet a certain target value. However, some criteria require target and boundary values-based normalizations, and these types of procedures receive much less attention despite their importance in many decision-making problems such as workers' physical workload evaluation. Criteria affecting physical workload require target and boundary values-based normalizations because these normalization procedures best match the properties of human physiological capacities. In this context, this study proposes new normalization procedures based on target and boundary values. These new normalizations are applied in Criteria Importance through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC), Preference Selection Index (PSI) to obtain criteria weights and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method to prioritize workers for their physical workload levels. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed to interpret the ranking differences for CRITIC-CoCoSo and PSI-CoCoSo integrations based on proposed normalization procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making is the property of World Scientific Publishing Company and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Business Source Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:It is important to perform to find the most appropriate normalization procedure in MCDM methods. Normalization procedures proposed in the literature have tended to focus on cost and benefit type criteria. Some of the criteria discussed in MCDM problems may be required not to exceed a certain lower bound or upper bound, while others may be required to meet a certain target value. However, some criteria require target and boundary values-based normalizations, and these types of procedures receive much less attention despite their importance in many decision-making problems such as workers' physical workload evaluation. Criteria affecting physical workload require target and boundary values-based normalizations because these normalization procedures best match the properties of human physiological capacities. In this context, this study proposes new normalization procedures based on target and boundary values. These new normalizations are applied in Criteria Importance through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC), Preference Selection Index (PSI) to obtain criteria weights and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method to prioritize workers for their physical workload levels. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed to interpret the ranking differences for CRITIC-CoCoSo and PSI-CoCoSo integrations based on proposed normalization procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02196220
DOI:10.1142/S0219622025500117