Zobrazit v EDS

Policy implementation as social justice: a realist review of administrative burden research.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: Policy implementation as social justice: a realist review of administrative burden research.
Autoři: Campbell, Jesse W.1 (AUTHOR) jcampbell@inu.ac.kr, Northcott, Emma2 (AUTHOR), Pandey, Sanjay K.2 (AUTHOR)
Zdroj: Public Management Review. Jul2025, p1-27. 27p. 1 Illustration.
Témata: SOCIAL justice, DISTRIBUTIVE justice, DISCRETION, SOCIAL policy, TAX compliance costs, POLICY analysis
Abstrakt: Administrative burden’s impact on distributive justice is well documented, but its effects on the procedural and interactional dimensions of social justice are less understood. Through a realist review of 104 articles, we identify eight mechanisms – administrative neutrality, marketization, devolution, means testing, benefit conditionality, service personalization, service digitization, and frontline discretion – that shape social justice outcomes based on implementation context variation. This study makes both a methodological and theoretical contribution, introducing the realist methodology and leveraging its strengths to link two of the discipline’s most prominent research areas: administrative burden and social justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Public Management Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Business Source Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Administrative burden’s impact on distributive justice is well documented, but its effects on the procedural and interactional dimensions of social justice are less understood. Through a realist review of 104 articles, we identify eight mechanisms – administrative neutrality, marketization, devolution, means testing, benefit conditionality, service personalization, service digitization, and frontline discretion – that shape social justice outcomes based on implementation context variation. This study makes both a methodological and theoretical contribution, introducing the realist methodology and leveraging its strengths to link two of the discipline’s most prominent research areas: administrative burden and social justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:14719037
DOI:10.1080/14719037.2025.2527315