Governance by One-Lot Shares.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Governance by One-Lot Shares.
Autoren: Cao, Feng1 (AUTHOR), Xuan, Yuhai2 (AUTHOR) yuhai.xuan@uci.edu, Yuan, Rongli3 (AUTHOR), Zou, Hong4 (AUTHOR)
Quelle: Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis. Mar2025, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p874-909. 36p.
Schlagwörter: *MINORITY stockholders, *INDIVIDUAL investors, *INVESTOR protection, *NEW business enterprises, *MAJORITY stockholders, *MERGERS & acquisitions, ACTIVISM
Geografische Kategorien: CHINA
Abstract: We use a novel experiment in China to examine the effects of having a quasi-official investor own a small number of shares on specific firm outcomes. We find that, relative to control firms, pilot firms experience an increase in dissenting votes from independent directors, a reduction in tunneling and earnings management activities, and an improvement in merger performance. Independent directors questioned by the quasi-official shareholder in activism events subsequently lose board seats in the director market. Overall, our results shed light on a new mechanism for enhancing the protection of minority shareholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Datenbank: Business Source Index
Beschreibung
Abstract:We use a novel experiment in China to examine the effects of having a quasi-official investor own a small number of shares on specific firm outcomes. We find that, relative to control firms, pilot firms experience an increase in dissenting votes from independent directors, a reduction in tunneling and earnings management activities, and an improvement in merger performance. Independent directors questioned by the quasi-official shareholder in activism events subsequently lose board seats in the director market. Overall, our results shed light on a new mechanism for enhancing the protection of minority shareholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00221090
DOI:10.1017/S0022109024000516