Zobrazit v EDS

A DIVERSITY SIGNAL SET PERSPECTIVE: EXAMINING INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF DIVERSITY PRACTICES ON WOMEN AND RACIALIZED NON-LEADER AND LEADER TURNOVER.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: A DIVERSITY SIGNAL SET PERSPECTIVE: EXAMINING INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF DIVERSITY PRACTICES ON WOMEN AND RACIALIZED NON-LEADER AND LEADER TURNOVER.
Autoři: TRZEBIATOWSKI, TIFFANY1 tiffany.trzebiatowski@colostate.edu, JIANG, KAIFENG2 jiang.1788@gsm.pku.edu.cn, ZHANG, ZHEN3 zhenzhang@smu.edu, ECKARDT, RORY4 reckardt@binghamton.edu, KIM, YEONGSU ANTHONY5 ykim0629@gmail.com
Zdroj: Academy of Management Journal. Feb2025, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p191-218. 30p. 2 Color Photographs, 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 4 Graphs.
Témata: *DIVERSITY in the workplace, *LEADERS, *MANAGEMENT turnover, *LABOR turnover, ROLE theory, WOMEN
Abstrakt: While organizations often implement multiple diversity practices, our understanding of their interactive effects is limited. Integrating the signal set congruence and incongruence literature with role theory, we theorize three-way interactive effects among diversity practices (resource, non-discrimination, and accountability) on women and racialized non-leader and leader turnover. We examine our model with two studies. In Study 1 (longitudinal panel data from 2010 to 2018; n 5 270–280 law firms), we find higher levels of resource practices decreased turnover rates when both safeguarding practices (non-discrimination and accountability) were high and congruent. Further, resource practices are less useful in reducing non-leaders’ turnover rate when safeguarding practices were mixed, whereas they are less useful in curbing leaders’ turnover rate when accountability practices were low. We theorize different underlying mechanisms for non-leaders and leaders at the individual level of analysis, finding initial support in an experimental vignette study (Study 2, n 5 650 non-managers and 661 managers). The relationships between the three-way interaction and non-leaders’ and leaders’ turnover intentions were mediated by concerns about unfair treatment and personal relevance, respectively. By focusing on interaction effects, we help disentangle when and how different configurations of diversity practices may be beneficial versus detrimental. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Academy of Management Journal is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Databáze: Business Source Index
Popis
Abstrakt:While organizations often implement multiple diversity practices, our understanding of their interactive effects is limited. Integrating the signal set congruence and incongruence literature with role theory, we theorize three-way interactive effects among diversity practices (resource, non-discrimination, and accountability) on women and racialized non-leader and leader turnover. We examine our model with two studies. In Study 1 (longitudinal panel data from 2010 to 2018; n 5 270–280 law firms), we find higher levels of resource practices decreased turnover rates when both safeguarding practices (non-discrimination and accountability) were high and congruent. Further, resource practices are less useful in reducing non-leaders’ turnover rate when safeguarding practices were mixed, whereas they are less useful in curbing leaders’ turnover rate when accountability practices were low. We theorize different underlying mechanisms for non-leaders and leaders at the individual level of analysis, finding initial support in an experimental vignette study (Study 2, n 5 650 non-managers and 661 managers). The relationships between the three-way interaction and non-leaders’ and leaders’ turnover intentions were mediated by concerns about unfair treatment and personal relevance, respectively. By focusing on interaction effects, we help disentangle when and how different configurations of diversity practices may be beneficial versus detrimental. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00014273
DOI:10.5465/amj.2020.1838