Zobrazit v EDS

In defense of value incomparability: A reply to Dorr, Nebel, and Zuehl.

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Název: In defense of value incomparability: A reply to Dorr, Nebel, and Zuehl.
Autoři: Carlson, Erik1 (AUTHOR) erik.carlson@filosofi.uu.se, Risberg, Olle1 (AUTHOR)
Zdroj: Nous (0029-4624). Sep2025, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p796-808. 13p.
Témata: *VALUE (Economics), *MONOTONIC functions, *PHILOSOPHERS, *MORAL reasoning, *HETEROGENEITY
Abstrakt: Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call 'Strong Monotonicity', which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y. In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Academic Search Index
Popis
Abstrakt:Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call 'Strong Monotonicity', which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y. In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00294624
DOI:10.1111/nous.12533