Entailment is Undecidable for Symbolic Heap Separation Logic Formulæ with Non-Established Inductive Rules
Entailment is undecidable in general for Separation (SL) Logic formulae with inductive definitions, but it has been shown to be decidable [1] if the inductive rules satisfy three conditions, namely progress, connectivity and establishment. We show that entailment is undecidable if the latter conditi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Information processing letters Vol. 173 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
01.01.2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0020-0190 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Entailment is undecidable in general for Separation (SL) Logic formulae with inductive definitions, but it has been shown to be decidable [1] if the inductive rules satisfy three conditions, namely progress, connectivity and establishment. We show that entailment is undecidable if the latter condition is dropped, thus drawing a much clearer frontier for (un)decidability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0020-0190 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ipl.2021.106169 |