Was the colonisation of Australia an invasion of sovereign territory?

This article presents a reassessment of the British colonisation of Australia from the internal perspective of the international law of the period. After a discussion of the value of using historical doctrine in this way, the article introduces three positions that might be taken on the peoples who...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Melbourne journal of international law Ročník 20; číslo 2; s. 493 - 529
Hlavní autor: Rowan Nicholson
Médium: Journal Article
Vydáno: Melbourne University of Melbourne, Faculty of Law 01.12.2019
Témata:
ISSN:1444-8602
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract This article presents a reassessment of the British colonisation of Australia from the internal perspective of the international law of the period. After a discussion of the value of using historical doctrine in this way, the article introduces three positions that might be taken on the peoples who were perceived as the least 'civilised' by Western international lawyers. These have not always been distinguished in the literature. The 'preclusive' position, according to which these peoples were incapable of sovereignty, is rejected as inconsistent with state practice. Although it does not prove feasible to eliminate either of the other two possibilities, the 'naturalist-legislative' and 'contractual' positions, they lead to similar results. On this basis it is concluded, not with complete certainty but with a high degree of confidence, that before colonisation the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia were sovereign within their territories in the strict sense of international law. It is also concluded that describing colonisation as an 'invasion' of sovereign territory accords with the doctrinal language of the period. In these respects, historical international law, despite being shaped by and in the interests of Western colonisers, agrees with language used today by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. In the course of this reassessment, the article offers insights of broader application into the role of customary norms and the legal status of pre-colonial non-Western entities.
AbstractList This article presents a reassessment of the British colonisation of Australia from the internal perspective of the international law of the period. After a discussion of the value of using historical doctrine in this way, the article introduces three positions that might be taken on the peoples who were perceived as the least 'civilised' by Western international lawyers. These have not always been distinguished in the literature. The 'preclusive' position, according to which these peoples were incapable of sovereignty, is rejected as inconsistent with state practice. Although it does not prove feasible to eliminate either of the other two possibilities, the 'naturalist-legislative' and 'contractual' positions, they lead to similar results. On this basis it is concluded, not with complete certainty but with a high degree of confidence, that before colonisation the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia were sovereign within their territories in the strict sense of international law. It is also concluded that describing colonisation as an 'invasion' of sovereign territory accords with the doctrinal language of the period. In these respects, historical international law, despite being shaped by and in the interests of Western colonisers, agrees with language used today by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. In the course of this reassessment, the article offers insights of broader application into the role of customary norms and the legal status of pre-colonial non-Western entities.
Author Rowan Nicholson
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Rowan Nicholson
BookMark eNqdjtFKwzAUhnsxwW36DnmBQpImTYsXMsamw-lAJl6GkzbpMmoiSRz49lYdU7wUDpyL7_8__kk2ct7pUTYmjLG8KjE9zyYx7jEmnHA6zhbPEFHaadT43jsbIVnvkDdo9hZTgN4CAoesO0A8gugPOmjbOZR0CDb58H59kZ0Z6KO-PP5p9rRcbOe3-Xpzs5rP1nkgVcVzhoUB1RSKG85gONJSqphqSkMLNUBdE6BcQC2qVuhSG-BNBbptjapErYppdvXtDS82yWFyr5vPwXEPKUqCZVGQUlpn_FeAYkowIRQziks-tO9-taGz8TXJqCE0u5-OD51svT3JVg_LzeP9ait5jVktOMFCYFxW_7OdwF_bB1qRg3s
ContentType Journal Article
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Law
EndPage 529
ExternalDocumentID 10.3316/informit.20210112042065
10.3316/INFORMIT.590497510770068
Genre Articles
GroupedDBID .CB
0ZK
123
29M
2WC
2XV
8G5
8R4
8R5
AACLI
ABACO
ABDBF
ABFRF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACUHS
ADCHZ
ADEYR
ADUOI
AEAQA
AEFWE
AEGZQ
AFACB
AFKRA
AFXCU
AGQRV
AHEHV
AKNUK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARTTT
AYAGU
AZQEC
BENPR
BHRNT
BPHCQ
CCPQU
DWQXO
E3Z
ESX
FLI
FM.
GCT
GJPHO
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCSNT
HISYW
HLR
HOCAJ
IAO
IEA
ILEIC
ILT
IOF
ITC
KEL
KGA
LGEZI
LMKDQ
LOTEE
LXB
LXHRH
M2O
N95
NADUK
NXXTH
OK1
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PUEGO
Q.-
Q2X
RHO
RXW
TAA
TAC
TAF
TR2
UNMZH
UVLOZ
W2G
X6Y
~8M
~ZZ
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-r1885-407fabc3b5f54a54a1d22b4bc6f23b07fe91a257a978d7e6efa5c8aeddfb879b3
ISSN 1444-8602
IngestDate Tue Sep 23 20:47:46 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 14 04:23:44 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 24 03:41:50 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-r1885-407fabc3b5f54a54a1d22b4bc6f23b07fe91a257a978d7e6efa5c8aeddfb879b3
Notes Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, Dec 2019, 493-529
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
MELBOURNE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, Vol. 20, No. 2, Dec 2019, 493-529
PageCount 37
ParticipantIDs rmit_agispt_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_INFORMIT_590497510770068
rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_20210112042065
rmit_agispt_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_informit_590497510770068
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20191201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2019
  text: 20191201
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Melbourne
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Melbourne
PublicationTitle Melbourne journal of international law
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher University of Melbourne, Faculty of Law
Publisher_xml – name: University of Melbourne, Faculty of Law
SSID ssj0015152
Score 2.08738
Snippet This article presents a reassessment of the British colonisation of Australia from the internal perspective of the international law of the period. After a...
SourceID rmit
SourceType Publisher
StartPage 493
SubjectTerms Aboriginal Australians
Colonization
Genocide
Human rights
Perspective
Social aspects
Sovereignty, Violation of (International law)
Title Was the colonisation of Australia an invasion of sovereign territory?
URI http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.590497510770068
http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.20210112042065
Volume 20
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Australia & New Zealand Database (NC LIVE)
  issn: 1444-8602
  databaseCode: AYAGU
  dateStart: 20050501
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 99991231
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/anz
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015152
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  issn: 1444-8602
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20050501
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 99991231
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015152
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Research Library
  issn: 1444-8602
  databaseCode: M2O
  dateStart: 20050501
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 99991231
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/pqrl
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0015152
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1JS8QwFA6OePAirriTgzcpdNqky0nEBQUdRRS9lZc2kRHpDJO6_Hxf0kynM15UEEooCUnbfOnb8vIeIQfghwWoKPIi1HI8JnLwUlkwT-Y-Q00sEkrZOLNXca-XPD2lty4Ln7bpBOKyTD4_0-G_Qo11CLY5OvsLuJtBsQLvEXQsEXYsfwT8I2grTZpw1KVz1rHy5tiqcQjGu_EdtGvQxovT5uesTJhGs-s-4-53LV9r4-dsoImJLfF1Ygy_G3zgE3CJIWHVDnVnV-imLR-NmhQyxjyToapNKwO_tSaCFuFjdZ5Dx0O5s2JMhbeeYTuNM6AxHITWhFDHiu0bF1fURFESRIqCIlKHdELf5EW4Dm6aHSJeZ1Nq3nIqAoIVDu6XyZKT6ulxjcYKmZPlKulcwccaOUM8KOJB23jQgaINHhRKOsbDNDR40AaPo3XycH52f3LhudwV3qibJBzV8liByEPBFWeAV7cIAoH_QqSCUGCjTLuA5BJQiy9iGUkFPE9AFoUSSZyKcIPMl4NSbhIqGZeodkIe5AkrIilYHjJfcuzMVJQGW-TUfHkGz309rLL6t8nGc5kNRs8ZsscMtT0zzdll7_zmDvlixlPUDmOkyXFsDgr9cpim4dswzFYbMmadCUv9ApX-3m8a4-2_ddshi5O1u0vmq9Gb3CML-XvV16N9u2K-ACp8cR0
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Was+the+colonisation+of+Australia+an+invasion+of+sovereign+territory%3F&rft.jtitle=Melbourne+journal+of+international+law&rft.au=Rowan+Nicholson&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.issn=1444-8602&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=529&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.3316%2Finformit.20210112042065
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1444-8602&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1444-8602&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1444-8602&client=summon