Big Data vs. Slow Understanding? Voraussetzungen und Vorgehen computerunterstützter Analyse transmedialer multimodaler Diskurse

The paper looks into the practice of a computer-assisted discourse analysis. Centring on the decisions and procedures that go into reconstructing multimodal frames from transmedia discourse, the paper has two aims. For one, it discusses the chances and challenges automatic text analysis has to addre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik Jg. 43; H. 1; S. 112 - 133
Hauptverfasser: Fraas, Claudia, Pentzold Christian
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Deutsch
Veröffentlicht: Berlin Walter de Gruyter GmbH 01.03.2015
Schlagworte:
Automatic text analysis
Big Data
Computer generated language analysis
Computers
Data analysis
Data collection
Discourse analysis
Law enforcement
Mobile phones
Multimodality
Surveillance
Text analysis
ISSN:0301-3294, 1613-0626
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The paper looks into the practice of a computer-assisted discourse analysis. Centring on the decisions and procedures that go into reconstructing multimodal frames from transmedia discourse, the paper has two aims. For one, it discusses the chances and challenges automatic text analysis has to address in facing the vast amounts of multimodal discourse that emerge in convergent media. Building on that, the paper explains the methodological premises and methodical procedures of a discourse analysis employing the computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software Atlas.ti. As such, it presents an investigation that does not answer the current prevalence of available ‘big data’ with computer power but explores the interplay between an interpretative analysis and technological support. It does so by using material from the discourse on the so-called Handygate affair. There, state authorities collected mobile phone data during the commemorative events of the Dresden bombings in February 2011. They thus created a big data collection which became the subject of public attention and was either framed as illegal and extensive instrument of state surveillance or as an efficient and accurate tool for law enforcement and targeted prosecution.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0301-3294
1613-0626
DOI:10.1515/zgl-2015-0005