Development and evaluation of the General Surgery Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (GOSATS)
Background Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency‐based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated t...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | British journal of surgery Ročník 106; číslo 12; s. 1617 - 1622 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.11.2019
Oxford University Press |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0007-1323, 1365-2168, 1365-2168 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Background
Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency‐based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated technical skill examination for graduating (postgraduate year (PGY)5) general surgery trainees.
Methods
A simulated eight‐station, procedure‐based general surgery technical skills examination was developed. Board‐certified general surgeons blinded to the level of training rated performance of PGY3 and PGY5 trainees by means of validated scoring. Cronbach's α was used to calculate reliability indices, and a conjunctive model to set a pass score with borderline regression methodology. Subkoviak methodology was employed to assess the reliability of the pass–fail decision. The relationship between passing the examination and PGY level was evaluated using χ2 analysis.
Results
Ten PGY3 and nine PGY5 trainees were included. Interstation reliability was 0·66, and inter‐rater reliability for three stations was 0·92, 0·97 and 0·76. A pass score of 176·8 of 280 (63·1 per cent) was set. The pass rate for PGY5 trainees was 78 per cent (7 of 9), compared with 30 per cent (3 of 10) for PGY3 trainees. Reliability of the pass–fail decision had an agreement coefficient of 0·88. Graduating trainees were significantly more likely to pass the examination than PGY3 trainees (χ2 = 4·34, P = 0·037).
Conclusion
A summative general surgery technical skills examination was developed with reliability indices within the range needed for high‐stakes assessments. Further evaluation is required before the examination can be used in decisions regarding certification.
Antecedentes
La adquisición de habilidades técnicas es importante en el entrenamiento especializado en cirugía. A pesar del énfasis en la capacitación basada en competencias, actualmente hay pocas herramientas disponibles para la evaluación directa de habilidades técnicas al finalizar el periodo de formación. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar y validar un examen simulado de habilidades técnicas para postgraduados en formación en cirugía general (5º año postgraduado).
Métodos
Se desarrolló un examen simulado de habilidades técnicas de procedimientos de ocho estaciones. Cirujanos generales certificados y ciegos respecto al nivel de formación puntuaron la actuación de 10 postgraduados de tercer año (PGY3) y 9 postgraduados de quinto año (PGY5) usando una puntuación validada. Se utilizó el coeficiente alfa de Cochrane para calcular los índices de fiabilidad, y un modelo conjuntivo para establecer la nota de paso del examen mediante un método de regresión borderline. La fiabilidad de la decisión pasar/no pasar el examen se evaluó usando la metodología Subkoviak. La relación entre pasar el examen y el nivel PGY se analizó mediante la prueba de ji al cuadrado.
Resultados
La fiabilidad entre estaciones fue de 0,66 y la fiabilidad entre evaluadores de 0,92, 0,97 y 0,76. Se estableció una puntuación para pasar el examen de 176,8/280 (63,1%). La tasa de paso del examen para postgraduados PGY5 fue del 78% (7/9) en comparación con el 30% (3/10) para los posgraduados PGY3. La fiabilidad de la decisión pasar/no pasar fue pₒ= 0,88. Los postgraduados PGY5 presentaban una probabilidad significativamente superior de pasar el examen en comparación con los postgraduados PGY3 (χ2 = 4,34, P = 0,037).
Conclusión
Se desarrolló un examen sumatorio de habilidades técnicas de cirugía general con índices de fiabilidad dentro del rango necesario para este tipo de valoraciones. Se requiere una evaluación adicional antes de que el examen se pueda utilizar en las decisiones de certificación.
Competency‐based training and assessment is receiving great attention in surgical education. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a general surgery summative assessment tool for senior trainees. With further study and confirmation, performance on this examination could help with decisions on surgical trainee certification.
Discriminating technical skills examination |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | BackgroundTechnical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency‐based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated technical skill examination for graduating (postgraduate year (PGY)5) general surgery trainees.MethodsA simulated eight‐station, procedure‐based general surgery technical skills examination was developed. Board‐certified general surgeons blinded to the level of training rated performance of PGY3 and PGY5 trainees by means of validated scoring. Cronbach's α was used to calculate reliability indices, and a conjunctive model to set a pass score with borderline regression methodology. Subkoviak methodology was employed to assess the reliability of the pass–fail decision. The relationship between passing the examination and PGY level was evaluated using χ2 analysis.ResultsTen PGY3 and nine PGY5 trainees were included. Interstation reliability was 0·66, and inter‐rater reliability for three stations was 0·92, 0·97 and 0·76. A pass score of 176·8 of 280 (63·1 per cent) was set. The pass rate for PGY5 trainees was 78 per cent (7 of 9), compared with 30 per cent (3 of 10) for PGY3 trainees. Reliability of the pass–fail decision had an agreement coefficient of 0·88. Graduating trainees were significantly more likely to pass the examination than PGY3 trainees (χ2 = 4·34, P = 0·037).ConclusionA summative general surgery technical skills examination was developed with reliability indices within the range needed for high‐stakes assessments. Further evaluation is required before the examination can be used in decisions regarding certification. Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency-based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated technical skill examination for graduating (postgraduate year (PGY)5) general surgery trainees.BACKGROUNDTechnical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency-based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated technical skill examination for graduating (postgraduate year (PGY)5) general surgery trainees.A simulated eight-station, procedure-based general surgery technical skills examination was developed. Board-certified general surgeons blinded to the level of training rated performance of PGY3 and PGY5 trainees by means of validated scoring. Cronbach's α was used to calculate reliability indices, and a conjunctive model to set a pass score with borderline regression methodology. Subkoviak methodology was employed to assess the reliability of the pass-fail decision. The relationship between passing the examination and PGY level was evaluated using χ2 analysis.METHODSA simulated eight-station, procedure-based general surgery technical skills examination was developed. Board-certified general surgeons blinded to the level of training rated performance of PGY3 and PGY5 trainees by means of validated scoring. Cronbach's α was used to calculate reliability indices, and a conjunctive model to set a pass score with borderline regression methodology. Subkoviak methodology was employed to assess the reliability of the pass-fail decision. The relationship between passing the examination and PGY level was evaluated using χ2 analysis.Ten PGY3 and nine PGY5 trainees were included. Interstation reliability was 0·66, and inter-rater reliability for three stations was 0·92, 0·97 and 0·76. A pass score of 176·8 of 280 (63·1 per cent) was set. The pass rate for PGY5 trainees was 78 per cent (7 of 9), compared with 30 per cent (3 of 10) for PGY3 trainees. Reliability of the pass-fail decision had an agreement coefficient of 0·88. Graduating trainees were significantly more likely to pass the examination than PGY3 trainees (χ2 = 4·34, P = 0·037).RESULTSTen PGY3 and nine PGY5 trainees were included. Interstation reliability was 0·66, and inter-rater reliability for three stations was 0·92, 0·97 and 0·76. A pass score of 176·8 of 280 (63·1 per cent) was set. The pass rate for PGY5 trainees was 78 per cent (7 of 9), compared with 30 per cent (3 of 10) for PGY3 trainees. Reliability of the pass-fail decision had an agreement coefficient of 0·88. Graduating trainees were significantly more likely to pass the examination than PGY3 trainees (χ2 = 4·34, P = 0·037).A summative general surgery technical skills examination was developed with reliability indices within the range needed for high-stakes assessments. Further evaluation is required before the examination can be used in decisions regarding certification.CONCLUSIONA summative general surgery technical skills examination was developed with reliability indices within the range needed for high-stakes assessments. Further evaluation is required before the examination can be used in decisions regarding certification. Background Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency‐based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated technical skill examination for graduating (postgraduate year (PGY)5) general surgery trainees. Methods A simulated eight‐station, procedure‐based general surgery technical skills examination was developed. Board‐certified general surgeons blinded to the level of training rated performance of PGY3 and PGY5 trainees by means of validated scoring. Cronbach's α was used to calculate reliability indices, and a conjunctive model to set a pass score with borderline regression methodology. Subkoviak methodology was employed to assess the reliability of the pass–fail decision. The relationship between passing the examination and PGY level was evaluated using χ2 analysis. Results Ten PGY3 and nine PGY5 trainees were included. Interstation reliability was 0·66, and inter‐rater reliability for three stations was 0·92, 0·97 and 0·76. A pass score of 176·8 of 280 (63·1 per cent) was set. The pass rate for PGY5 trainees was 78 per cent (7 of 9), compared with 30 per cent (3 of 10) for PGY3 trainees. Reliability of the pass–fail decision had an agreement coefficient of 0·88. Graduating trainees were significantly more likely to pass the examination than PGY3 trainees (χ2 = 4·34, P = 0·037). Conclusion A summative general surgery technical skills examination was developed with reliability indices within the range needed for high‐stakes assessments. Further evaluation is required before the examination can be used in decisions regarding certification. Antecedentes La adquisición de habilidades técnicas es importante en el entrenamiento especializado en cirugía. A pesar del énfasis en la capacitación basada en competencias, actualmente hay pocas herramientas disponibles para la evaluación directa de habilidades técnicas al finalizar el periodo de formación. El objetivo de este estudio fue desarrollar y validar un examen simulado de habilidades técnicas para postgraduados en formación en cirugía general (5º año postgraduado). Métodos Se desarrolló un examen simulado de habilidades técnicas de procedimientos de ocho estaciones. Cirujanos generales certificados y ciegos respecto al nivel de formación puntuaron la actuación de 10 postgraduados de tercer año (PGY3) y 9 postgraduados de quinto año (PGY5) usando una puntuación validada. Se utilizó el coeficiente alfa de Cochrane para calcular los índices de fiabilidad, y un modelo conjuntivo para establecer la nota de paso del examen mediante un método de regresión borderline. La fiabilidad de la decisión pasar/no pasar el examen se evaluó usando la metodología Subkoviak. La relación entre pasar el examen y el nivel PGY se analizó mediante la prueba de ji al cuadrado. Resultados La fiabilidad entre estaciones fue de 0,66 y la fiabilidad entre evaluadores de 0,92, 0,97 y 0,76. Se estableció una puntuación para pasar el examen de 176,8/280 (63,1%). La tasa de paso del examen para postgraduados PGY5 fue del 78% (7/9) en comparación con el 30% (3/10) para los posgraduados PGY3. La fiabilidad de la decisión pasar/no pasar fue pₒ= 0,88. Los postgraduados PGY5 presentaban una probabilidad significativamente superior de pasar el examen en comparación con los postgraduados PGY3 (χ2 = 4,34, P = 0,037). Conclusión Se desarrolló un examen sumatorio de habilidades técnicas de cirugía general con índices de fiabilidad dentro del rango necesario para este tipo de valoraciones. Se requiere una evaluación adicional antes de que el examen se pueda utilizar en las decisiones de certificación. Competency‐based training and assessment is receiving great attention in surgical education. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a general surgery summative assessment tool for senior trainees. With further study and confirmation, performance on this examination could help with decisions on surgical trainee certification. Discriminating technical skills examination Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency-based training, few tools are currently available for direct technical skills assessment at the completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simulated technical skill examination for graduating (postgraduate year (PGY)5) general surgery trainees. A simulated eight-station, procedure-based general surgery technical skills examination was developed. Board-certified general surgeons blinded to the level of training rated performance of PGY3 and PGY5 trainees by means of validated scoring. Cronbach's α was used to calculate reliability indices, and a conjunctive model to set a pass score with borderline regression methodology. Subkoviak methodology was employed to assess the reliability of the pass-fail decision. The relationship between passing the examination and PGY level was evaluated using χ analysis. Ten PGY3 and nine PGY5 trainees were included. Interstation reliability was 0·66, and inter-rater reliability for three stations was 0·92, 0·97 and 0·76. A pass score of 176·8 of 280 (63·1 per cent) was set. The pass rate for PGY5 trainees was 78 per cent (7 of 9), compared with 30 per cent (3 of 10) for PGY3 trainees. Reliability of the pass-fail decision had an agreement coefficient of 0·88. Graduating trainees were significantly more likely to pass the examination than PGY3 trainees (χ = 4·34, P = 0·037). A summative general surgery technical skills examination was developed with reliability indices within the range needed for high-stakes assessments. Further evaluation is required before the examination can be used in decisions regarding certification. |
| Author | Satterthwaite, L. de Montbrun, S. Sachdeva, A. K. Halwani, Y. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Y. orcidid: 0000-0002-9269-1990 surname: Halwani fullname: Halwani, Y. organization: University of Toronto – sequence: 2 givenname: A. K. surname: Sachdeva fullname: Sachdeva, A. K. organization: American College of Surgeons – sequence: 3 givenname: L. surname: Satterthwaite fullname: Satterthwaite, L. organization: University of Toronto, Surgical Skills Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital – sequence: 4 givenname: S. surname: de Montbrun fullname: de Montbrun, S. email: demontbrunsa@smh.ca organization: St Michael's Hospital |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpdkctOwzAQRS1URB-w4AeQJTZlEepXUndZChRQpS5S1pHjTGmK4xQ7Kerfkz5gwWpGmnOvZuZ2UcuWFhC6puSeEsIG6drfU8rD0RnqUB6FAaORbKEOIWQYUM54G3W9XxNCOQnZBWpzGkoZRrSDikfYgik3BdgKK5th2CpTqyovLS6XuFoBnoIFpwyOa_cBbofn6Rp0lW8Bx5WrdVU7yPDYe_D-4NLIFqBXNtd70WduDO5P5_F4Ed9dovOlMh6uTrWH3p-fFpOXYDafvk7Gs2DDqRgFUsvRcjhiUjKphNDAJDCRNkeJjMpmyiPJuOapGopUsAgIE4oDTWmmQq0476H-0Xfjyq8afJUUuddgjLJQ1j5hnDQ-hEnaoLf_0HVZO9tst6eGgjMm94Y3J6pOC8iSjcsL5XbJ7yMbYHAEvnMDu785Jck-oaRJKDkklDy8xYeG_wDXoYLu |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2019 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2019 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.11359 |
| DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| EISSN | 1365-2168 |
| EndPage | 1622 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 31588561 BJS11359 |
| Genre | article Validation Study Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 23N 31~ 33P 36B 3O- 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 5WD 66C 6J9 6P2 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8F7 8UM 930 A01 A03 AABZA AACZT AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANHP AAONW AAPGJ AAPXW AAQQT AARHZ AAUAY AAVAP AAWDT AAYEP AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDFA ABEJV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABNHQ ABOCM ABPQP ABPTD ABPVW ABQNK ABWST ABXVV ACBWZ ACCFJ ACFBH ACFRR ACGFO ACGFS ACMXC ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACUTJ ACXQS ACYHN ACYXJ ACZBC ADBBV ADEOM ADIPN ADIYS ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADQBN ADVEK ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AFBPY AFFNX AFFZL AFGKR AFPWT AFXAL AFYAG AFYLJ AFZJQ AGMDO AGQXC AGUTN AHMBA AHMMS AI. AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJAOE AJBDE AJEEA ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMBMR AMYDB APJGH AQDSO ASPBG ATGXG ATUGU AVNTJ AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BCRHZ BDRZF BEYMZ BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FLUFQ FOEOM FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X H13 HBH HF~ HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE IX1 J0M J5H JPC KBUDW KOP KQQ KSI KSN L7B LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M65 MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N4W N9A NF~ NNB NOMLY NU- O66 O9- OAUYM OCZFY OHH OIG OJZSN OPAEJ OVD OWPYF P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RGB RIG RIWAO RJQFR ROL ROX RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ TEORI TMA UB1 V2E V8K V9Y VH1 VVN W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI X7M XG1 XV2 YFH YOC YUY ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAGQS ABGNP ABVGC AFFQV AJNCP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN AAMMB ADNBA AEFGJ AEMQT AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY AJBYB ALXQX JXSIZ K9. O8X 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p3149-8c89f7928828a44ce28e24b1684d188c836823c3ba74b426e024a3e1b1da5ca33 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 14 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000494696100009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
| IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 09:04:49 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 14:40:37 EST 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:29:47 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:38:21 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Language | English |
| License | 2019 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p3149-8c89f7928828a44ce28e24b1684d188c836823c3ba74b426e024a3e1b1da5ca33 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9269-1990 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article-pdf/106/12/1617/36118714/bjs11359.pdf |
| PMID | 31588561 |
| PQID | 2307432283 |
| PQPubID | 976337 |
| PageCount | 6 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2301880281 proquest_journals_2307432283 pubmed_primary_31588561 wiley_primary_10_1002_bjs_11359_BJS11359 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | November 2019 2019-11-00 20191101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2019 text: November 2019 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Chichester, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chichester, UK – name: England – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | British journal of surgery |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Br J Surg |
| PublicationYear | 2019 |
| Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Oxford University Press |
| Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd – name: Oxford University Press |
| References | 2015; 261 2014; 218 2006; 93 2010; 32 1997; 84 2015; 126 1997; 173 2015; 95 2013; 369 2007; 186 2010; 363 1996; 71 2016; 264 2005 1997; 2 2017; 152 2016; 103 1993; 165 2015; 49 2004; 135 2002; 168 1988; 25 2002; 24 2013; 258 2013; 216 2019 2013; 257 2017 2013 1998; 73 2007; 21 2018; 75 1989 2006; 102 |
| References_xml | – volume: 25 start-page: 47 year: 1988 end-page: 55 article-title: A practitioner's guide to computation and interpretation of reliability indices for mastery tests publication-title: J Educ Meas – volume: 165 start-page: 358 year: 1993 end-page: 361 article-title: Teaching and testing technical skills publication-title: Am J Surg – volume: 363 year: 2010 article-title: The new recommendations on duty hours from the ACGME Task Force publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 103 start-page: 300 year: 2016 end-page: 306 article-title: Setting pass scores for assessment of technical performance by surgical trainees publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 126 start-page: 559 year: 2015 end-page: 568 article-title: Preparedness of obstetrics and gynecology residents for fellowship training publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 173 start-page: 226 year: 1997 end-page: 230 article-title: Testing technical skill via an innovative ‘bench station’ examination publication-title: Am J Surg – volume: 264 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 6 article-title: Implementing and evaluating a national certification technical skills examination: the Colorectal Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill publication-title: Ann Surg – year: 2005 – volume: 49 start-page: 161 year: 2015 end-page: 173 article-title: A systematic review of validity evidence for checklists global rating scales in simulation‐based assessment publication-title: Med Educ – volume: 75 start-page: 344 year: 2018 end-page: 350 article-title: Developing the blueprint for a general surgery technical skills certification examination: a validation study publication-title: J Surg Educ – volume: 102 start-page: 853 year: 2006 end-page: 858 article-title: Incorporating simulation‐based objective structured clinical examination into the Israeli National Board Examination in Anesthesiology publication-title: Anesth Analg – volume: 261 start-page: 846 year: 2015 end-page: 853 article-title: Simulation in surgery: what's needed next? publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 186 start-page: S14 year: 2007 end-page: S19 article-title: Australian curriculum framework for junior doctors publication-title: Med J Aust – volume: 71 start-page: S55 year: 1996 end-page: S63 article-title: Global rating scales in residency education publication-title: Acad Med – volume: 84 start-page: 273 year: 1997 end-page: 278 article-title: Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 168 start-page: 139 year: 2002 end-page: 144 article-title: Assessment of technical surgical skills publication-title: Eur J Surg – volume: 24 start-page: 136 year: 2002 end-page: 143 article-title: The Scottish doctor – learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners publication-title: Med Teach – volume: 32 start-page: 651 year: 2010 end-page: 656 article-title: Competency‐based medical education in postgraduate medical education publication-title: Med Teach – volume: 369 start-page: 1434 year: 2013 end-page: 1442 article-title: Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 24 start-page: 368 year: 2002 end-page: 369 article-title: New edition of Tomorrow's Doctors publication-title: Med Teach – volume: 93 start-page: 1132 year: 2006 end-page: 1138 article-title: The examination assessment of technical competence in vascular surgery publication-title: Br J Surg – start-page: 13 year: 1989 end-page: 103 – volume: 21 start-page: 1991 year: 2007 end-page: 1995 article-title: FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill publication-title: Surg Endosc – volume: 2 start-page: 201 year: 1997 end-page: 211 article-title: Using the judgments of physician examiners in setting the standards for a national multi‐center high stakes OSCE publication-title: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract – volume: 216 start-page: 764 year: 2013 end-page: 771 article-title: Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready? publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – volume: 73 start-page: 993 year: 1998 end-page: 997 article-title: Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE‐format examination publication-title: Acad Med – volume: 152 start-page: 1134 year: 2017 end-page: 1140 article-title: Association of general surgery resident remediation and program director attitudes with resident attrition publication-title: JAMA Surg – volume: 95 start-page: 827 year: 2015 end-page: 838 article-title: Moving the needle: simulation's impact on patient outcomes publication-title: Surg Clin North Am – volume: 258 start-page: 440 year: 2013 end-page: 449 article-title: General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors publication-title: Ann Surg – year: 2017 – volume: 218 start-page: 695 year: 2014 end-page: 703 article-title: Perceptions of graduating general surgery chief residents: are they confident in their training? publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – volume: 257 start-page: 586 year: 2013 end-page: 593 article-title: State of the evidence on simulation‐based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 218 start-page: 1063 year: 2014 end-page: 1072.e1031 article-title: Are general surgery residents ready to practice? A survey of the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors and Young Fellows Association publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – year: 2019 – volume: 135 start-page: 6 year: 2004 end-page: 20 article-title: Assessing competency in surgery: where to begin? publication-title: Surgery – year: 2013 |
| SSID | ssj0013052 |
| Score | 2.3814864 |
| Snippet | Background
Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency‐based training, few tools are currently... Technical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency-based training, few tools are currently available for... BackgroundTechnical skill acquisition is important in surgery specialty training. Despite an emphasis on competency‐based training, few tools are currently... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1617 |
| SubjectTerms | Checklist Clinical Competence Competency-Based Education Educational Measurement - methods General Surgery - education Humans Internship and Residency Models, Educational Reproducibility of Results Skill development Skills Surgery Surgical techniques |
| Title | Development and evaluation of the General Surgery Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (GOSATS) |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fbjs.11359 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31588561 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2307432283 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2301880281 |
| Volume | 106 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000494696100009&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2168 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0013052 issn: 0007-1323 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ1bS8MwFMcPOn3wxQve5o0IPuhDsU3S9gSf5mWKiIrdYG8lbTPYnJ049fObS9cp-CD4VkhCS89Jzj-X8wvAkYh1GNFxxiv6EXo8w8gTSs9SQurHtMB-IRXayybi-3vs9cTjHJxNc2EcH6JecDM9w47XpoPLbHI6g4Zmw4m5kCQU87BAtd_yBixcPrW7d7NNBD90sHDDQWSUTcFCPj2tG_8mLH_qVBto2iv_-sRVWK70JWk5h1iDOVWuw8u3o0FElgWZMb7JuE-0BiQVfpokLk2aPGRDNxSSxBJmP95UQVo1xtM0s6vyxsYkeR6MRuT4-iFpdZKTDei2rzoXN151z4L3yvQEycMcRT8WVIttlJzniqKiPAsi5EWAupRFSFnOMhnzTEd0peO6ZCrIgkKGuWRsExrluFTbQJBKtOm-ypdcxL5UUcwLFHnu65cI3oS96e9Oq84ySc1ZdM4Mh6cJh3WxdnOzdyFLNf6wdQw5jmLQhC1npvTV8ThSFoSIWgc24dhaoy5wSGaaajuk1g7p-W1iH3b-XnUXlrRIEi7_cA8a-qerfVjMP98Hk7cDmI97eFB53hfpK9jJ |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ3PT9swFMefujJpuwDTGCt04Ek7wCEisZ3kWeJSGKXbunZaisQtchJXatelVbvu78c_0nRIHCZxi2RbifKe_b7-8T4G-CRiHUZ0nPGKcYQezzDyhNKzlJD6MS1wXEiF9rKJeDDA-3vxowGXm1wYx4eoF9xMz7DjtengZkH6YksNzaYrcyNJKF7ADtduFDZh5_PP7l1_u4vgh44WbkCIjLINWcinF3Xjp5TlY6FqI01373nfuA-7lcIkHecSb6Chyrfw-5_DQUSWBdlSvsl8TLQKJBWAmiQuUZoMs6kbDEliGbPrpSpIpwZ5mmZ2Xd5YmSS_JrMZObsdJp1Rcn4Ad92b0XXPq25a8BZMT5E8zFGMY0G13EbJea4oKsqzIEJeBKhLWYSU5SyTMc90TFc6skumgiwoZJhLxt5Bs5yX6j0QpBJtwq_yJRexL1UU8wJFnvv6JYK3oL3532nVXVapOY3OmSHxtOBjXawd3exeyFLN17aOYcdRDFpw6OyULhyRI2VBiKiVYAvOrDnqAgdlpqm2Q2rtkF59TezD0f9XPYVXvdH3ftr_Mvh2DK-1ZBIuG7ENTW0A9QFe5n__TFbLk8oBHwDUGtvR |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpZ3bS-QwFIcPri6LL17YXR1vG8EHfSi2SdqegC_jZXZXZRSr4FtJmxS8dQZH_fvNpdNR8EHwrZCElp6cnF8u5wvAlkhNGDFxJlBVggEvMAmENrOUmIYpVVgpqdFdNpH2-3h9Lc6nYG-cC-P5EO2Cm_UMN15bB9dDVe1OqKHF7cjeSBKLbzDDY5EYt5w5vOhdnU52EcLY08ItCJFRNiYLhXS3bfyRsnwvVF2k6c1_7RsXYK5RmKTru8QiTOn6Jzy8ORxEZK3IhPJNBhUxKpA0AGqS-URpclbc-sGQZI4x-_yoFem2IE_bzK3LWyuT7O7m_p5s_z3LupfZzi-46h1dHvwLmpsWgiEzU6QASxRVKqiR2yg5LzVFTXkRJchVhKaUJUhZyQqZ8sLEdG0iu2Q6KiIl41Iy9hum60Gtl4EglegSfnUouUhDqZOUKxRlGZqXCN6BtfH_zht3GeX2NDpnlsTTgc222HR0u3shaz14dnUsO45i1IElb6d86IkcOYtiRKMEO7DtzNEWeCgzzY0dcmeHfP84cw8rn6_6B36cH_by0__9k1WYNYpJ-GTENZg2_1-vw_fy5elm9LjR9L9Xk0TbTA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development+and+evaluation+of+the+General+Surgery+Objective+Structured+Assessment+of+Technical+Skill+%28GOSATS%29&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Halwani%2C+Y&rft.au=Sachdeva%2C+A+K&rft.au=Satterthwaite%2C+L&rft.au=de+Montbrun%2C+S&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fbjs.11359&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31588561&rft.externalDocID=31588561 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon |