Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era

To determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time. It is generally accepted that hospital volume is associated with mortality in high-risk procedures. However, as surgical safety has improved over the last decade, recent evidence has suggested that the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery Jg. 260; H. 2; S. 244
Hauptverfasser: Reames, Bradley N, Ghaferi, Amir A, Birkmeyer, John D, Dimick, Justin B
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 01.08.2014
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1528-1140, 1528-1140
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract To determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time. It is generally accepted that hospital volume is associated with mortality in high-risk procedures. However, as surgical safety has improved over the last decade, recent evidence has suggested that the inverse relationship has diminished or been eliminated. Using national Medicare claims data from 2000 through 2009, we examined mortality among 3,282,127 patients who underwent 1 of 8 gastrointestinal, cardiac, or vascular procedures. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles of operative volume. Using multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for patient characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital volume and mortality, and assessed for changes over time. We performed sensitivity analyses using hierarchical logistic regression modeling with hospital-level random effects to confirm our results. Throughout the 10-year period, a significant inverse relationship was observed in all procedures. In 5 of the 8 procedures studied, the strength of the volume-outcome relationship increased over time. In esophagectomy, for example, the adjusted odds ratio of mortality in very low volume hospitals compared to very high volume hospitals increased from 2.25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-3.23] in 2000-2001 to 3.68 (95% CI: 2.66-5.11) in 2008-2009. Only pancreatectomy showed a notable decrease in strength of the relationship over time, from 5.83 (95% CI: 3.64-9.36) in 2000-2001, to 3.08 (95% CI: 2.07-4.57) in 2008-2009. For all procedures examined, higher volume hospitals had significantly lower mortality rates than lower volume hospitals. Despite recent improvements in surgical safety, the strong inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality persists in the modern era.
AbstractList To determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time. It is generally accepted that hospital volume is associated with mortality in high-risk procedures. However, as surgical safety has improved over the last decade, recent evidence has suggested that the inverse relationship has diminished or been eliminated. Using national Medicare claims data from 2000 through 2009, we examined mortality among 3,282,127 patients who underwent 1 of 8 gastrointestinal, cardiac, or vascular procedures. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles of operative volume. Using multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for patient characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital volume and mortality, and assessed for changes over time. We performed sensitivity analyses using hierarchical logistic regression modeling with hospital-level random effects to confirm our results. Throughout the 10-year period, a significant inverse relationship was observed in all procedures. In 5 of the 8 procedures studied, the strength of the volume-outcome relationship increased over time. In esophagectomy, for example, the adjusted odds ratio of mortality in very low volume hospitals compared to very high volume hospitals increased from 2.25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-3.23] in 2000-2001 to 3.68 (95% CI: 2.66-5.11) in 2008-2009. Only pancreatectomy showed a notable decrease in strength of the relationship over time, from 5.83 (95% CI: 3.64-9.36) in 2000-2001, to 3.08 (95% CI: 2.07-4.57) in 2008-2009. For all procedures examined, higher volume hospitals had significantly lower mortality rates than lower volume hospitals. Despite recent improvements in surgical safety, the strong inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality persists in the modern era.
To determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time.OBJECTIVETo determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time.It is generally accepted that hospital volume is associated with mortality in high-risk procedures. However, as surgical safety has improved over the last decade, recent evidence has suggested that the inverse relationship has diminished or been eliminated.BACKGROUNDIt is generally accepted that hospital volume is associated with mortality in high-risk procedures. However, as surgical safety has improved over the last decade, recent evidence has suggested that the inverse relationship has diminished or been eliminated.Using national Medicare claims data from 2000 through 2009, we examined mortality among 3,282,127 patients who underwent 1 of 8 gastrointestinal, cardiac, or vascular procedures. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles of operative volume. Using multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for patient characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital volume and mortality, and assessed for changes over time. We performed sensitivity analyses using hierarchical logistic regression modeling with hospital-level random effects to confirm our results.METHODSUsing national Medicare claims data from 2000 through 2009, we examined mortality among 3,282,127 patients who underwent 1 of 8 gastrointestinal, cardiac, or vascular procedures. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles of operative volume. Using multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for patient characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital volume and mortality, and assessed for changes over time. We performed sensitivity analyses using hierarchical logistic regression modeling with hospital-level random effects to confirm our results.Throughout the 10-year period, a significant inverse relationship was observed in all procedures. In 5 of the 8 procedures studied, the strength of the volume-outcome relationship increased over time. In esophagectomy, for example, the adjusted odds ratio of mortality in very low volume hospitals compared to very high volume hospitals increased from 2.25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-3.23] in 2000-2001 to 3.68 (95% CI: 2.66-5.11) in 2008-2009. Only pancreatectomy showed a notable decrease in strength of the relationship over time, from 5.83 (95% CI: 3.64-9.36) in 2000-2001, to 3.08 (95% CI: 2.07-4.57) in 2008-2009.RESULTSThroughout the 10-year period, a significant inverse relationship was observed in all procedures. In 5 of the 8 procedures studied, the strength of the volume-outcome relationship increased over time. In esophagectomy, for example, the adjusted odds ratio of mortality in very low volume hospitals compared to very high volume hospitals increased from 2.25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-3.23] in 2000-2001 to 3.68 (95% CI: 2.66-5.11) in 2008-2009. Only pancreatectomy showed a notable decrease in strength of the relationship over time, from 5.83 (95% CI: 3.64-9.36) in 2000-2001, to 3.08 (95% CI: 2.07-4.57) in 2008-2009.For all procedures examined, higher volume hospitals had significantly lower mortality rates than lower volume hospitals. Despite recent improvements in surgical safety, the strong inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality persists in the modern era.CONCLUSIONSFor all procedures examined, higher volume hospitals had significantly lower mortality rates than lower volume hospitals. Despite recent improvements in surgical safety, the strong inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality persists in the modern era.
Author Ghaferi, Amir A
Dimick, Justin B
Reames, Bradley N
Birkmeyer, John D
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Bradley N
  surname: Reames
  fullname: Reames, Bradley N
  organization: From the Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Amir A
  surname: Ghaferi
  fullname: Ghaferi, Amir A
– sequence: 3
  givenname: John D
  surname: Birkmeyer
  fullname: Birkmeyer, John D
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Justin B
  surname: Dimick
  fullname: Dimick, Justin B
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24368634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNT01Lw0AUXKRiP_QfiOzRS-q-3Zfs7rEUa4WCB_Uc1uQtRpJszCaF_nsrVuhcZpgZBmbOJm1oibFbEEsQVj-87lZLcQ6l0ws2g1SaBADF5ExP2TzGLyEAjdBXbCpRZSZTOGN2G2JXDa7m-1CPDXHXljx01Luh2hNvQn_MquHAq5YPn79GSX3Lj_k1u_SujnRz4gV73zy-rbfJ7uXpeb3aJZ00MCQEqJ02aNArEuAQUYGRhaW0UB4RtE5LbQUVXnmbSbSZNmVJSN76VDq5YPd_u10fvkeKQ95UsaC6di2FMeaQgTFSW6mP1btTdfxoqMy7vmpcf8j_78ofbd9YYQ
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000375
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1528-1140
ExternalDocumentID 24368634
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIA NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 AG039434
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: 5T32CA009672-23
– fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: T32 CA009672
– fundername: NIA NIH HHS
  grantid: 5R01AG039434-03
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.3C
.55
.GJ
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
1J1
23M
2WC
354
3O-
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
71W
77Y
7O~
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAEJM
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAUEB
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPMR
ABPPZ
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABXYN
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACDOF
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIJW
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACRZS
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACZKN
ADBBV
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFBFQ
AFCHL
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFMBP
AFNMH
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHJKT
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHQVU
AHRYX
AHVBC
AI.
AIJEX
AINUH
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJJEV
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BAWUL
BOYCO
BQLVK
BS7
BYPQX
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIK
DIWNM
DUNZO
E.X
E3Z
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FEDTE
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
J5H
JF7
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K-A
K-F
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
M18
N4W
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
OCB
OCUKA
ODA
ODMTH
OGEVE
OHH
OHYEH
OK1
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
R58
RIG
RLZ
RPM
RXW
S4R
S4S
T8P
TAF
TEORI
TR2
TSPGW
UQX
V2I
VH1
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
X7M
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZMQN
~H1
7X8
ABPXF
ACBKD
ADKSD
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-e147a78484f3e01a4443182c9e5c3f441775d790ecf3f96249678dde4ef9f52a2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 358
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000339173500016&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1528-1140
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 12:39:02 EST 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:05:23 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p281t-e147a78484f3e01a4443182c9e5c3f441775d790ecf3f96249678dde4ef9f52a2
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 24368634
PQID 1618827927
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1618827927
pubmed_primary_24368634
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Annals of surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Surg
PublicationYear 2014
SSID ssj0014807
Score 2.5982924
Snippet To determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time. It is generally accepted that hospital volume is associated...
To determine whether the relationship between hospital volume and mortality has changed over time.OBJECTIVETo determine whether the relationship between...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 244
SubjectTerms Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Clinical Competence
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Male
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Surgical Procedures, Operative - mortality
United States - epidemiology
Workload - statistics & numerical data
Title Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24368634
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1618827927
Volume 260
WOSCitedRecordID wos000339173500016&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07a8MwEBZt06FLH_SVvlChq0lsSZFuKqE0dEhDoA-yGdmSIENst077-3uybDIVCvXgxRjM-XT3nU73fYTcSYQRjEOGS5wZLFAsRFksTJRg0TNyaiSgmVt7n8rZTC0WMG833Or2WGUXE5tAbcrc75EPPLG78mx38r76iLxqlO-uthIa26THEMp4r5aLTRehHZfGFIWVElYS3egcyMHLdByoC7uLSfE7yGySzeTgv595SPZbmEnHwS-OyJYtjgl0IiE0xCSqC0PLygbyb7pqkDiicrosKOJCump00ig-PyFvk8fXh6eolU6IqkTF68jGXGqpuOKO2WGsOUegoJIcrMiZ87JjUhgJQ5s75mCENRgmLYx03DpwItHJKdkpysKeEwqQYUnEuTFGc6Yhs8LmRg3BmVjHmeuT284SKbqm7zfowpZfdbqxRZ-cBXOmVeDQSBPPfI9ecvGHty_JHsIUHo7dXZGew4Vpr8lu_r1e1p83zT_H-2z-_AMvfbQM
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital+volume+and+operative+mortality+in+the+modern+era&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgery&rft.au=Reames%2C+Bradley+N&rft.au=Ghaferi%2C+Amir+A&rft.au=Birkmeyer%2C+John+D&rft.au=Dimick%2C+Justin+B&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.issn=1528-1140&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.volume=260&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=244&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FSLA.0000000000000375&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1528-1140&client=summon