Function Values Are Enough for L2-Approximation

We study the L 2 -approximation of functions from a Hilbert space and compare the sampling numbers with the approximation numbers. The sampling number e n is the minimal worst-case error that can be achieved with n function values, whereas the approximation number a n is the minimal worst-case error...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foundations of computational mathematics Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 1141 - 1151
Main Authors: Krieg, David, Ullrich, Mario
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.08.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1615-3375, 1615-3383
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We study the L 2 -approximation of functions from a Hilbert space and compare the sampling numbers with the approximation numbers. The sampling number e n is the minimal worst-case error that can be achieved with n function values, whereas the approximation number a n is the minimal worst-case error that can be achieved with n pieces of arbitrary linear information (like derivatives or Fourier coefficients). We show that e n ≲ 1 k n ∑ j ≥ k n a j 2 , where k n ≍ n / log ( n ) . This proves that the sampling numbers decay with the same polynomial rate as the approximation numbers and therefore that function values are basically as powerful as arbitrary linear information if the approximation numbers are square-summable. Our result applies, in particular, to Sobolev spaces H mix s ( T d ) with dominating mixed smoothness s > 1 / 2 and dimension d ∈ N , and we obtain e n ≲ n - s log sd ( n ) . For d > 2 s + 1 , this improves upon all previous bounds and disproves the prevalent conjecture that Smolyak’s (sparse grid) algorithm is optimal.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1615-3375
1615-3383
DOI:10.1007/s10208-020-09481-w