Tetracycline versus penicillin in the treatment of louse-borne relapsing fever

A prospective study of 120 louse-borne relapsing fever (LBRF) patient admitted to Mekele Regional Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia from September to November 1991 was done. The patients were assigned systematically to a single dose of either tetracycline or procaine penicillin (sixty each). Doses given we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethiopian medical journal Jg. 30; H. 3; S. 175
Hauptverfasser: Gebrehiwot, T, Fiseha, A
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Ethiopia 01.07.1992
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0014-1755
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract A prospective study of 120 louse-borne relapsing fever (LBRF) patient admitted to Mekele Regional Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia from September to November 1991 was done. The patients were assigned systematically to a single dose of either tetracycline or procaine penicillin (sixty each). Doses given were oral tetracycline 250 mg or intramuscular procaine penicillin 200,000 units for children ages 12 years or less, and 500 mg or 600,000 IU for adults, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tetracycline to that of procaine penicillin. Both drugs induced a Jarisch-Herxheimer (JH) like reaction, which was clinically similar in the two treatment groups, but peaked later and was more prolonged in the patients treated with procaine penicillin. Spirochaetes cleared more slowly and relapses were noticed only in the procaine penicillin treated group. Thus, tetracycline is recommended as first choice therapy and a single dose is sufficient for treatment of LBRF patients.
AbstractList A prospective study of 120 louse-borne relapsing fever (LBRF) patient admitted to Mekele Regional Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia from September to November 1991 was done. The patients were assigned systematically to a single dose of either tetracycline or procaine penicillin (sixty each). Doses given were oral tetracycline 250 mg or intramuscular procaine penicillin 200,000 units for children ages 12 years or less, and 500 mg or 600,000 IU for adults, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tetracycline to that of procaine penicillin. Both drugs induced a Jarisch-Herxheimer (JH) like reaction, which was clinically similar in the two treatment groups, but peaked later and was more prolonged in the patients treated with procaine penicillin. Spirochaetes cleared more slowly and relapses were noticed only in the procaine penicillin treated group. Thus, tetracycline is recommended as first choice therapy and a single dose is sufficient for treatment of LBRF patients.A prospective study of 120 louse-borne relapsing fever (LBRF) patient admitted to Mekele Regional Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia from September to November 1991 was done. The patients were assigned systematically to a single dose of either tetracycline or procaine penicillin (sixty each). Doses given were oral tetracycline 250 mg or intramuscular procaine penicillin 200,000 units for children ages 12 years or less, and 500 mg or 600,000 IU for adults, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tetracycline to that of procaine penicillin. Both drugs induced a Jarisch-Herxheimer (JH) like reaction, which was clinically similar in the two treatment groups, but peaked later and was more prolonged in the patients treated with procaine penicillin. Spirochaetes cleared more slowly and relapses were noticed only in the procaine penicillin treated group. Thus, tetracycline is recommended as first choice therapy and a single dose is sufficient for treatment of LBRF patients.
A prospective study of 120 louse-borne relapsing fever (LBRF) patient admitted to Mekele Regional Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia from September to November 1991 was done. The patients were assigned systematically to a single dose of either tetracycline or procaine penicillin (sixty each). Doses given were oral tetracycline 250 mg or intramuscular procaine penicillin 200,000 units for children ages 12 years or less, and 500 mg or 600,000 IU for adults, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of tetracycline to that of procaine penicillin. Both drugs induced a Jarisch-Herxheimer (JH) like reaction, which was clinically similar in the two treatment groups, but peaked later and was more prolonged in the patients treated with procaine penicillin. Spirochaetes cleared more slowly and relapses were noticed only in the procaine penicillin treated group. Thus, tetracycline is recommended as first choice therapy and a single dose is sufficient for treatment of LBRF patients.
Author Gebrehiwot, T
Fiseha, A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: T
  surname: Gebrehiwot
  fullname: Gebrehiwot, T
  organization: BRTP, Department of Biochemistry, Addis Abeba, Ethiopia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A
  surname: Fiseha
  fullname: Fiseha, A
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1396621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNotUE1rxCAU9LBlu93uTyh46i2gRmM8lqVfsGwv23Mw-tIKxqRqCvvvKzSPB8MMM4_h3aFNmAJs0I4QyisqhbhFh5RcXzgRXFC2RVtaq6ZhdIfOF8hRm6vxLgD-hZiWhGcIzjhfJFw2fwPOEXQeIWQ8DdhPS4Kqn2JJRPB6Ti584QFK-h7dDNonOKy4R58vz5fjW3X6eH0_Pp2qmZEmV1rzpre6sTVte0KlYkxQ0yppbU3KCC2spkb2daMGaTnXjEMrTQ1qYAwM26PH_7tznH4WSLkbXTLgvQ5Q2nWyZpQpIovxYTUu_Qi2m6Mbdbx26wPYH9ghWVo
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
ExternalDocumentID 1396621
Genre Controlled Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Ethiopia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Ethiopia
GroupedDBID ---
53G
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBC
ECM
EIF
F5P
H~9
NPM
OK1
P2P
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-aa46bda6d318b01792251c897dd300005a5da1c7b369f7d44a24e87c3e9f22ec2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 14
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=1396621&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0014-1755
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 10:03:06 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 00:34:45 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p206t-aa46bda6d318b01792251c897dd300005a5da1c7b369f7d44a24e87c3e9f22ec2
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 1396621
PQID 73212907
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_73212907
pubmed_primary_1396621
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1992-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1992-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 1992
  text: 1992-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Ethiopia
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Ethiopia
PublicationTitle Ethiopian medical journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Ethiop Med J
PublicationYear 1992
SSID ssib001054512
Score 1.3791219
Snippet A prospective study of 120 louse-borne relapsing fever (LBRF) patient admitted to Mekele Regional Hospital, Tigray, Ethiopia from September to November 1991...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 175
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Ethiopia - epidemiology
Female
Hospitals, District
Humans
Infant
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Penicillin G Procaine - administration & dosage
Penicillin G Procaine - adverse effects
Penicillin G Procaine - therapeutic use
Prospective Studies
Recurrence
Relapsing Fever - drug therapy
Relapsing Fever - mortality
Survival Rate
Tetracycline - administration & dosage
Tetracycline - adverse effects
Tetracycline - therapeutic use
Title Tetracycline versus penicillin in the treatment of louse-borne relapsing fever
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1396621
https://www.proquest.com/docview/73212907
Volume 30
WOSCitedRecordID wos1396621&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpR3LSgMxMFTrwYsPtFifOXgNmmQ32QVBRCwetPRQpbclm0ygINu1rYJ_70zbVS_iQQi5DYR5Z56MnQfrTFQxFxJ0FIkKUWReShGNNC6lEW6L2pznB9vvZ6NRPmixq6YXhsoqG524UNRh4ilGfmG1opCJva5fBe2MotzqaoHGGmtrdGSIp-3oRw4IvZFULseFy0SgnUx_dyMX5qS3_b-H7LCtlRvJb5Z032UtqPZYfwjzqfMf1O0InOot3ma8hmrsKahScTzo7vGv2nI-ifwFf_4gkBEQgvpaaood8AgIvc-eenfD23ux2pcganVp5sK5xJTBmYByWpKkoaxKn-U2BE12KXVpcNLbUps82pAkTiWQWa8hj0qBVx22Xk0qOGBcp7pUpdIWAiTgyxzVAk2WNxnkpZGuy84a5BTIj5RkcBXgi4sGPV3WWeK3qJdjMwokkTFKHv4JesQ2v4tij1k7oiDCCdvw7_PxbHq6oDLe_cHjJzrNtbY
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tetracycline+versus+penicillin+in+the+treatment+of+louse-borne+relapsing+fever&rft.jtitle=Ethiopian+medical+journal&rft.au=Gebrehiwot%2C+T&rft.au=Fiseha%2C+A&rft.date=1992-07-01&rft.issn=0014-1755&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0014-1755&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0014-1755&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0014-1755&client=summon