Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights

The popular inverse probability weighting method in causal inference is often hampered by extreme propensity scores, resulting in biased estimates and excessive variance. A common remedy is to trim patients with extreme scores (i.e., remove them from the weighted analysis). However, such methods are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of epidemiology Vol. 188; no. 1; p. 250
Main Authors: Li, Fan, Thomas, Laine E
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01.01.2019
Subjects:
Bias
Causality
Epidemiologic Methods
Humans
Models, Statistical
Propensity Score
ISSN:1476-6256, 1476-6256
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The popular inverse probability weighting method in causal inference is often hampered by extreme propensity scores, resulting in biased estimates and excessive variance. A common remedy is to trim patients with extreme scores (i.e., remove them from the weighted analysis). However, such methods are often sensitive to the choice of cutoff points and discard a large proportion of the sample. The implications for bias and the precision of the treatment effect estimate are unclear. These problems are mitigated by a newly developed method, the overlap weighting method. Overlap weights emphasize the target population with the most overlap in observed characteristics between treatments, by continuously down-weighting the units in the tails of the propensity score distribution. Here we use simulations to compare overlap weights to standard inverse probability weighting with trimming, in terms of bias, variance, and 95% confidence interval coverage. A range of propensity score distributions are considered, including settings with substantial nonoverlap and extreme values. To facilitate practical implementation, we further provide a consistent estimator for the standard error of the treatment effect estimated using overlap weighting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1476-6256
1476-6256
DOI:10.1093/aje/kwy201