967 Scrubbing Up: A Drain on Sustainability

Aim Surgical scrub is a vital step in infection control prior to operating. Hospitals typically opt for a traditional tap or a sensor-operated tap to control their water source. This project compared the water usage and efficiency per surgical scrub for the two different taps. Method Theatre system...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:British journal of surgery Ročník 110
Hlavní autori: Yoganathan, S, Zabkiewicz, C, Jones, T, Shingles, L
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Oxford Oxford University Press 01.09.2023
Predmet:
ISSN:0007-1323, 1365-2168
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract Aim Surgical scrub is a vital step in infection control prior to operating. Hospitals typically opt for a traditional tap or a sensor-operated tap to control their water source. This project compared the water usage and efficiency per surgical scrub for the two different taps. Method Theatre system was reviewed to determine total number of staff members who scrubbed in for each operation, over a one-month period within one health board. Average scrubbing time and quantity of water used per scrub was calculated by observing multiple different staff members. Results During September 2022, 6076 staff members scrubbed in for theatres. The average time spent handwashing was 2 minutes and 26 seconds, however only 47 seconds worth of running water was used to wash their hands. Sites using traditional taps used approximately 18.6L of water whilst sensor-operated taps used 13.2L per surgical scrub. This equated to 110,752 litres of water used over the month solely for scrubbing up. Sensor-operated taps would run for 63 seconds when activated with the modal number of times sensors were activated 3. Therefore, traditional taps were more efficient with 32% of running water used for surgical scrub compared to 25% for sensor-operated taps. Conclusions Sensor-operated taps used less water per surgical scrub; however, the operating time of the taps reduced its efficiency. Coordinating scrubbing up and ‘sharing’ one tap or adjusting the sensor taps operating time are simple step to minimise water wastage. Furthermore, the use of ‘waterless scrub’ solution is a viable option whilst also minimising infection risk.
AbstractList Aim Surgical scrub is a vital step in infection control prior to operating. Hospitals typically opt for a traditional tap or a sensor-operated tap to control their water source. This project compared the water usage and efficiency per surgical scrub for the two different taps. Method Theatre system was reviewed to determine total number of staff members who scrubbed in for each operation, over a one-month period within one health board. Average scrubbing time and quantity of water used per scrub was calculated by observing multiple different staff members. Results During September 2022, 6076 staff members scrubbed in for theatres. The average time spent handwashing was 2 minutes and 26 seconds, however only 47 seconds worth of running water was used to wash their hands. Sites using traditional taps used approximately 18.6L of water whilst sensor-operated taps used 13.2L per surgical scrub. This equated to 110,752 litres of water used over the month solely for scrubbing up. Sensor-operated taps would run for 63 seconds when activated with the modal number of times sensors were activated 3. Therefore, traditional taps were more efficient with 32% of running water used for surgical scrub compared to 25% for sensor-operated taps. Conclusions Sensor-operated taps used less water per surgical scrub; however, the operating time of the taps reduced its efficiency. Coordinating scrubbing up and ‘sharing’ one tap or adjusting the sensor taps operating time are simple step to minimise water wastage. Furthermore, the use of ‘waterless scrub’ solution is a viable option whilst also minimising infection risk.
Author Yoganathan, S
Jones, T
Shingles, L
Zabkiewicz, C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S
  surname: Yoganathan
  fullname: Yoganathan, S
– sequence: 2
  givenname: C
  surname: Zabkiewicz
  fullname: Zabkiewicz, C
– sequence: 3
  givenname: T
  surname: Jones
  fullname: Jones, T
– sequence: 4
  givenname: L
  surname: Shingles
  fullname: Shingles, L
BookMark eNotjj1rwzAURUVJoU7SuaugY3HypCfLft1C-gmBDGnmIFlSsQlyatlD--traKd7pnPunM1iFz1jdwJWAgjXtk3rn2icLKqVlvKKZQJ1kUuhqxnLAKDMBUq8YfOUWgCBUMiMPZAu-aHuR2ub-MmPl0e-4U-9aSLvIj-MaZjQ2ObcDN9Ldh3MOfnb_12w48vzx_Yt3-1f37ebXd4JUDKngIAEwQFVkmpnnKJQ6Hp6gBSUr10wqqyUEK4Cr6z1moT22hnStYeAC3b_57303dfo03Bqu7GPU_KEUkFJhZIafwGsrkT1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
DBID K9.
DOI 10.1093/bjs/znad258.622
DatabaseName ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
DatabaseTitle ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1365-2168
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OC
1ZS
23N
36B
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WD
66C
6J9
6P2
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8F7
8UM
930
A01
A03
AABZA
AACZT
AAESR
AAEVG
AAONW
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAVAP
AAYEP
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABNHQ
ABOCM
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABPVW
ABQNK
ABVGC
ABWST
ABXVV
ACFBH
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACMXC
ACYHN
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIPN
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNBA
ADQBN
ADVEK
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEGXH
AEIMD
AEMQT
AENEX
AFFZL
AFGKR
AFXAL
AFYAG
AFZJQ
AGQXC
AGUTN
AHGBF
AHMBA
AHMMS
AIAGR
AJBYB
AJEEA
AJNCP
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALXQX
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATGXG
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BCRHZ
BDRZF
BEYMZ
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EMOBN
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
H13
HBH
HHY
HHZ
HZ~
IH2
IX1
J0M
JPC
JXSIZ
K9.
KOP
KQQ
KSI
KSN
L7B
LAW
LC2
LC3
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LYRES
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
NOMLY
O66
O8X
O9-
OAUYM
OCZFY
OHH
OIG
OJZSN
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROX
RX1
RYL
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V2E
V8K
V9Y
VVN
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
XG1
XV2
YFH
YOC
YUY
ZY1
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-o1042-9f30390fd09829cdad49f56c00739f4ecdfa478411d80e4bbe6916e6da96ce0f3
ISSN 0007-1323
IngestDate Sat Nov 29 15:01:47 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-o1042-9f30390fd09829cdad49f56c00739f4ecdfa478411d80e4bbe6916e6da96ce0f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article-pdf/110/Supplement_7/znad258.622/51297421/znad258.622.pdf
PQID 3240795426
PQPubID 976337
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_3240795426
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20230901
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2023
  text: 20230901
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
PublicationTitle British journal of surgery
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
SSID ssj0013052
Score 2.423801
Snippet Aim Surgical scrub is a vital step in infection control prior to operating. Hospitals typically opt for a traditional tap or a sensor-operated tap to control...
SourceID proquest
SourceType Aggregation Database
SubjectTerms Sensors
Title 967 Scrubbing Up: A Drain on Sustainability
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/3240795426
Volume 110
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1365-2168
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0013052
  issn: 0007-1323
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 19980101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NS8MwFA9z8-BFFBU_pvQgXqSu3228DbfhYUxxLQwvI0lTmUo39-XYX-9L03Utg6EHL6GkpUn7S19f3sfvIXRtwUJxNOaqzGSmalFDUN5iS7UjHNpMpzrzoqTYhNvpeL0efi6VuqtcmPmnG8feYoFH_wo19AHYInX2D3BnN4UOOAbQoQXYof0V8Nhx4YsdzygVVoBgJHPPG6IUhPAMdFcZUyIotujTTfmNcmQSk1zSdCIa3og0theMpq-Efgz494AtC2bXrAxAjgcSppQW2W7n7Q2GmQVUTbflMRZkrKvCHleKLS7FahJLp8sCOpnclfGsGzJc8lvRd5hMaxmT0LC9O0cmLxf5sjtP_VbQbvf9Zs-_GX2popSYcLmndVV2UMVwbeyVUaXxAheunUuaLUnk04muGJ-wWYNRa7kxN37QidbhH6D9dLug1CXMh6jE4yN0CxArGcRKMLpX6koCsDKMlSLAxyhoNf2HRzUteqEOdZEqhSNQKrAWhRr2DMxCElo4sh2WuFQji7MwIpZwFuuhp3GLUu6Ahs-dkGCHcS0yT1A5BnxPkUINqhETFErGscW5TVyPmISYlBmEgOw-Q9XV0_XTpTXpC4JGF9uguJ1vP32B9tbLo4rK0_GMX6JdNoelOr5K3_kPZ6I_fQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=967+Scrubbing+Up%3A+A+Drain+on+Sustainability&rft.jtitle=British+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Yoganathan%2C+S&rft.au=Zabkiewicz%2C+C&rft.au=Jones%2C+T&rft.au=Shingles%2C+L&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft.volume=110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fbjs%2Fznad258.622&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0007-1323&client=summon