Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods
The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Im...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
25.08.2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1941-2703, 1941-2703 |
| Online Access: | Get more information |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm.
As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing.
Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator.
Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate.
MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. Study Purpose: As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Methods: Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Results: Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. Conclusions: MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. Study Purpose: As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Methods: Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Results: Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. Conclusions: MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled. The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled. |
| Author | Parry, Mark Iley, Teresa Clay, Jim Mohammed, Hlack Andersson, Patrik U Mitchell, Jolyon P Svensson, Mårten Roberts, Daryl L Slator, Lois |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Patrik U surname: Andersson fullname: Andersson, Patrik U organization: Inhalation Product Development, AstraZeneca R&D Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden – sequence: 2 givenname: Jim surname: Clay fullname: Clay, Jim organization: Kindeva Drug Delivery, Loughborough, United Kingdom – sequence: 3 givenname: Mark surname: Parry fullname: Parry, Mark organization: Intertek Melbourn, Melbourn, Cambridge, United Kingdom – sequence: 4 givenname: Teresa surname: Iley fullname: Iley, Teresa organization: Intertek Melbourn, Melbourn, Cambridge, United Kingdom – sequence: 5 givenname: Daryl L orcidid: 0000-0001-5667-6083 surname: Roberts fullname: Roberts, Daryl L organization: Applied Particle Principles LLC, Hamilton, Virginia, USA – sequence: 6 givenname: Lois surname: Slator fullname: Slator, Lois organization: University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom – sequence: 7 givenname: Mårten surname: Svensson fullname: Svensson, Mårten organization: Emmace Consulting AB, Lund, Sweden – sequence: 8 givenname: Hlack surname: Mohammed fullname: Mohammed, Hlack organization: GSK plc, Ware, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom – sequence: 9 givenname: Jolyon P orcidid: 0000-0001-5456-8425 surname: Mitchell fullname: Mitchell, Jolyon P organization: Jolyon Mitchell Inhaler Consulting Services Inc., London, Canada |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40854584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNpNkcluFDEQhi2UiGw8ABfkI5cGL-12N7cwITDSjDKHcB5Vt6szRm57sN1Z3o8HwxMSiVMt-v_6VFVn5MgHj4S85-wT51p_5l3NheZcKC41q7V8Q04PvUpoJo_-y0_IWUq_GGt43ci35KRmrapVW5-SP-vZZVttIGY72D34TL866w0auvT3mLK9g2yDp9bnUFoZowdHVyElTDSMdI3GDq8SugjThHGw4NwTvbwH66B3SNf20fq7YneY0xd6e5hb6is7jhixMG_is2Ppd-AKehODmYdMFw6eOdfBufBwsGx2ECcYwh4Lo8DzLph0QY5HcAnfvcRz8vP62-3iR7W6-b5cXK6qSTQ8V3WrOtlLw5BJEI3SPaJWClqB0Ndy0NDyhivZCDMarozgpgPFlOmaQQ9KinPy8d_cfQy_57LEdrJpQOfAY5jTVopy3vII3hXphxfp3E9otvtoJ4hP29fLi797YIuk |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| DBID | NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1177/19412711251370473 |
| DatabaseName | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
| EISSN | 1941-2703 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 40854584 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 4.4 5GY ABBKN ABJNI ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ADBBV AENEX AFRAH AHMBA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BENPR BNQNF CS3 DU5 EBS F5P IAO IER IHR IM4 INH INR NPM O9- RML SCNPE UE5 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-m261t-48593b3d0e03a2657bee755a82eab43c7a81615362dfd15d21d9a505d96c7c532 |
| IEDL.DBID | 7X8 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001558298900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1941-2703 |
| IngestDate | Sat Nov 01 14:17:16 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 04:59:17 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | aerosol sampling inhaler testing mixing inlet flow control breathing simulation |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-m261t-48593b3d0e03a2657bee755a82eab43c7a81615362dfd15d21d9a505d96c7c532 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5456-8425 0000-0001-5667-6083 |
| PMID | 40854584 |
| PQID | 3246370419 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3246370419 pubmed_primary_40854584 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-08-25 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-08-25 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2025 text: 2025-08-25 day: 25 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| SSID | ssj0061463 |
| Score | 2.4112434 |
| SecondaryResourceType | online_first |
| Snippet | The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at... Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
| Title | Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40854584 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3246370419 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001558298900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaAcuAC9AWlUE2lqqda5GEnu1yq8lhRqd3msEh7W_kVdaWQLE0o7P_jhzHjeLu9IFXiEilW_JA88Xz2eL6PsSMs1Tp2hpvIZFwoqblWsuTKZrIUHvEOvNhEPh4PptNhEQ7c2nCtcrUm-oXaNobOyN-j48_SPBLx8HTxg5NqFEVXg4TGY7aRIpQhq86nd1EE9DxeSQ336THlXaUhqkmES1SW5DG5d2qVZNP_hTC9pxm9-N8xvmTPA8aEs94oNtkjV2-x46InqV6ewGSdc9WewDEUa_rq5Tb743NyeaHCheu6g48VkSpauEfK0dQwr7sGwoliBRcNhY-hKaGP_YRPgDJQSNVJVdUSzm7VvKJkLbic_0anidXRbtoPMKF28f1z0Gvp4OrG1zivr9GFWSh6ZlrwIp7Yzwjtt_lFVVajXzjsAzsnRex2h30bfZl8-sqD1gP_jnu4jgviXdOpjVyUqiSTuXYul1INEqe0SE2uBh6bZoktbSxtEtuhQvRmh5nJjUyTXfakbmr3mkEWGcRBFqFHqYUrhUaUGNlU6FI7aTOxxw5XszfDf4kCJKp2zc92tp6_PfaqN4HZoif9mBETHMWU3zyg9j57lpBMcISLkHzLNkpcSdw79tTcdvP25sAbKT7HxeVft872tA |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Participant+Blinded+Investigation+into+Internal+Losses+of+Medication+in+Commercially+Available+Mixing+Inlets%3A+Testing+Different+Orally+Inhaled+Product+Classes+Following+Pharmacopeial+Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+aerosol+medicine+and+pulmonary+drug+delivery&rft.au=Andersson%2C+Patrik+U&rft.au=Clay%2C+Jim&rft.au=Parry%2C+Mark&rft.au=Iley%2C+Teresa&rft.date=2025-08-25&rft.eissn=1941-2703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F19412711251370473&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40854584&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40854584&rft.externalDocID=40854584 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1941-2703&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1941-2703&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1941-2703&client=summon |