Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods

The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery
Hauptverfasser: Andersson, Patrik U, Clay, Jim, Parry, Mark, Iley, Teresa, Roberts, Daryl L, Slator, Lois, Svensson, Mårten, Mohammed, Hlack, Mitchell, Jolyon P
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: United States 25.08.2025
Schlagworte:
ISSN:1941-2703, 1941-2703
Online-Zugang:Weitere Angaben
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Abstract The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.
AbstractList Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. Study Purpose: As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Methods: Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Results: Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. Conclusions: MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. Study Purpose: As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Methods: Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Results: Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. Conclusions: MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.
The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at varying flow rates by controlling the flow of air via its side-arm. As part of the European Pharmaceutical Aerosol Group (EPAG) Impactor subgroup, we report a cross-industry experimental investigation by five organizations to determine internal losses of different inhaler-generated aerosolized medications within commercially available MIs, focusing on pharmacopeial methods for product testing. Evaluations were undertaken of solution and suspension formulations delivered by pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), and compressed air-jet and vibrating mesh nebulizers. Four different apparatuses were evaluated at different constant air flow rates entering the MI side arm. The nebulizers were tested utilizing a variable adult flow profile generated by a breathing simulator. Losses within the MI were generally <5%, expressed as a percentage of the delivered mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) ex-inhaler. These losses were sufficiently small that they can in most cases be accommodated within the allowance of ±5% OIP label claim emitted mass/actuation in the pharmacopeial compendia for total internal losses for aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) determination. However, corresponding average losses were between 2.8% and 5.2% of the mass of API presented to the MI for the blister-based DPIs. APSD-derived measures were largely unaffected by the magnitude of pressurized air flow up to 60 L/min to the side-arm of the MI, except for the solution-formulated pMDI, where increasing flow rate was associated with reduced mass median aerodynamic diameter and increased geometric standard deviation, suggestive of a dependency related to ethanol co-solvent evaporation rate. MI loss evaluation should be considered an important part of method development to minimize internal losses of the aerosolized medication being sampled.
Author Parry, Mark
Iley, Teresa
Clay, Jim
Mohammed, Hlack
Andersson, Patrik U
Mitchell, Jolyon P
Svensson, Mårten
Roberts, Daryl L
Slator, Lois
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Patrik U
  surname: Andersson
  fullname: Andersson, Patrik U
  organization: Inhalation Product Development, AstraZeneca R&D Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jim
  surname: Clay
  fullname: Clay, Jim
  organization: Kindeva Drug Delivery, Loughborough, United Kingdom
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mark
  surname: Parry
  fullname: Parry, Mark
  organization: Intertek Melbourn, Melbourn, Cambridge, United Kingdom
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Teresa
  surname: Iley
  fullname: Iley, Teresa
  organization: Intertek Melbourn, Melbourn, Cambridge, United Kingdom
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Daryl L
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5667-6083
  surname: Roberts
  fullname: Roberts, Daryl L
  organization: Applied Particle Principles LLC, Hamilton, Virginia, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Lois
  surname: Slator
  fullname: Slator, Lois
  organization: University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mårten
  surname: Svensson
  fullname: Svensson, Mårten
  organization: Emmace Consulting AB, Lund, Sweden
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Hlack
  surname: Mohammed
  fullname: Mohammed, Hlack
  organization: GSK plc, Ware, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Jolyon P
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5456-8425
  surname: Mitchell
  fullname: Mitchell, Jolyon P
  organization: Jolyon Mitchell Inhaler Consulting Services Inc., London, Canada
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40854584$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNkcluFDEQhi2UiGw8ABfkI5cGL-12N7cwITDSjDKHcB5Vt6szRm57sN1Z3o8HwxMSiVMt-v_6VFVn5MgHj4S85-wT51p_5l3NheZcKC41q7V8Q04PvUpoJo_-y0_IWUq_GGt43ci35KRmrapVW5-SP-vZZVttIGY72D34TL866w0auvT3mLK9g2yDp9bnUFoZowdHVyElTDSMdI3GDq8SugjThHGw4NwTvbwH66B3SNf20fq7YneY0xd6e5hb6is7jhixMG_is2Ppd-AKehODmYdMFw6eOdfBufBwsGx2ECcYwh4Lo8DzLph0QY5HcAnfvcRz8vP62-3iR7W6-b5cXK6qSTQ8V3WrOtlLw5BJEI3SPaJWClqB0Ndy0NDyhivZCDMarozgpgPFlOmaQQ9KinPy8d_cfQy_57LEdrJpQOfAY5jTVopy3vII3hXphxfp3E9otvtoJ4hP29fLi797YIuk
ContentType Journal Article
DBID NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1177/19412711251370473
DatabaseName PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1941-2703
ExternalDocumentID 40854584
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
4.4
5GY
ABBKN
ABJNI
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
AENEX
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BENPR
BNQNF
CS3
DU5
EBS
F5P
IAO
IER
IHR
IM4
INH
INR
NPM
O9-
RML
SCNPE
UE5
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-m261t-48593b3d0e03a2657bee755a82eab43c7a81615362dfd15d21d9a505d96c7c532
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001558298900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1941-2703
IngestDate Sat Nov 01 14:17:16 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 04:59:17 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords aerosol sampling
inhaler testing
mixing inlet
flow control
breathing simulation
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-m261t-48593b3d0e03a2657bee755a82eab43c7a81615362dfd15d21d9a505d96c7c532
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-5456-8425
0000-0001-5667-6083
PMID 40854584
PQID 3246370419
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3246370419
pubmed_primary_40854584
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-25
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-25
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-25
  day: 25
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery
PublicationTitleAlternate J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv
PublicationYear 2025
SSID ssj0061463
Score 2.4112434
SecondaryResourceType online_first
Snippet The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is evaluated at...
Background: The "Miller" design of mixing inlet (MI) enables a cascade impactor to operate at a constant flow rate while the orally inhaled product-on-test is...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Title Multi-Participant Blinded Investigation into Internal Losses of Medication in Commercially Available Mixing Inlets: Testing Different Orally Inhaled Product Classes Following Pharmacopeial Methods
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40854584
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3246370419
WOSCitedRecordID wos001558298900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELag5cClLc8WWjRIqKdG5LGO415QW1iBRJccFmlvK8cPdaWQLE0o3f_XH8aM42W5ICFxiZQoY1uasWfs8XwfY28EN0YKnGl5wV1ECFiRlIbKuPIi1hjAuth5sgkxmRSzmSzDgVsXrlWu10S_UJtW0xn5W3T8eSbiUSLfLb9HxBpF2dVAoXGfbWcYypBVi9nvLAJ6Hs-khvv0hOquspDVJMAl-paKhNw7tUq06X-LML2nGe_-7xj32E6IMeFsMIpH7J5tHrPjcgCpXp3AdFNz1Z3AMZQb-OrVE3bna3KjUoUL100P5zWBKhr4A5SjbWDR9C2EE8UaPreUPobWwZD7Cb8AVaAQq5Oq6xWc3ahFTcVacLm4RaeJ4mg33SlMqV18fx_4Wnr4cu0lPjVX6MIMlAMyLXgST-xnjPbb_iSR9eiXFvvAzokRu3vKvo4_TC8-RoHrIfqGe7g-GhHuWpWZ2MaZSnMuKmsF56pIrapGmRaq8LFpnhpnEm7SxEiF0ZuRuRaaZ-kzttW0jd1nYBRqttKJlM6iPlyhEq61s3lFRcCxOGCv19qb41yiBIlqbPujm2_0d8CeDyYwXw6gH3NCgqOc8ot_kH7JHqZEExzjIsQP2bbDlcQesQf6pl9016-8keJzUl7-AmHG9Qo
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Participant+Blinded+Investigation+into+Internal+Losses+of+Medication+in+Commercially+Available+Mixing+Inlets%3A+Testing+Different+Orally+Inhaled+Product+Classes+Following+Pharmacopeial+Methods&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+aerosol+medicine+and+pulmonary+drug+delivery&rft.au=Andersson%2C+Patrik+U&rft.au=Clay%2C+Jim&rft.au=Parry%2C+Mark&rft.au=Iley%2C+Teresa&rft.date=2025-08-25&rft.eissn=1941-2703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F19412711251370473&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40854584&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40854584&rft.externalDocID=40854584
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1941-2703&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1941-2703&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1941-2703&client=summon