Impact of planning CT slice thickness on the accuracy of automatic target registration using the on-board cone-beam CT

We have evaluated relationship between planning CT slice thickness and the accuracy of automatic target registration using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Planning CT images were acquired with reconstructed slice thickness of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10mm for three different phantoms: Penta-Guide phantom, acrylic ball...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics Vol. 31; no. 1; p. 2
Main Authors: Inoue, Hiroyuki, Tanooka, Masao, Doi, Hiroshi, Miura, Hideharu, Nakagawa, Hideo, Sakai, Toshiyuki, Oda, Masahiko, Yasumasa, Katsumi, Sakamoto, Kiyoshi, Kamikonya, Norihiko, Hirota, Shozo
Format: Journal Article
Language:Japanese
Published: Japan 2011
Subjects:
ISSN:1345-5354
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract We have evaluated relationship between planning CT slice thickness and the accuracy of automatic target registration using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Planning CT images were acquired with reconstructed slice thickness of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10mm for three different phantoms: Penta-Guide phantom, acrylic ball phantom, and pelvic phantom. After correctly placing the phantom at the isocenter using an in-room laser, we purposely displaced it by moving the treatment couch and then obtained CBCT images. Registration between the planning CT and the CBCT was performed using automatic target registration software, and the registration errors were recorded for each planning CT data set with different slice thickness. The respective average and standard deviation of errors for 10 mm slice thickness CT in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions (n=15 data sets) were: 0.7 +/- 0.2mm, 0.8 +/- 0.2mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2mm for the Penta-Guide phantom; 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm for the acrylic ball phantom; and 0.6 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2 mm for the pelvic phantom. We found that the mean registration errors were always less than 1 mm regardless of the slice thickness tested. The results suggest that there is no obvious correlation between the planning CT slice thickness and the registration errors.
AbstractList We have evaluated relationship between planning CT slice thickness and the accuracy of automatic target registration using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Planning CT images were acquired with reconstructed slice thickness of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10mm for three different phantoms: Penta-Guide phantom, acrylic ball phantom, and pelvic phantom. After correctly placing the phantom at the isocenter using an in-room laser, we purposely displaced it by moving the treatment couch and then obtained CBCT images. Registration between the planning CT and the CBCT was performed using automatic target registration software, and the registration errors were recorded for each planning CT data set with different slice thickness. The respective average and standard deviation of errors for 10 mm slice thickness CT in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions (n=15 data sets) were: 0.7 +/- 0.2mm, 0.8 +/- 0.2mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2mm for the Penta-Guide phantom; 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm for the acrylic ball phantom; and 0.6 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2 mm for the pelvic phantom. We found that the mean registration errors were always less than 1 mm regardless of the slice thickness tested. The results suggest that there is no obvious correlation between the planning CT slice thickness and the registration errors.
We have evaluated relationship between planning CT slice thickness and the accuracy of automatic target registration using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Planning CT images were acquired with reconstructed slice thickness of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10mm for three different phantoms: Penta-Guide phantom, acrylic ball phantom, and pelvic phantom. After correctly placing the phantom at the isocenter using an in-room laser, we purposely displaced it by moving the treatment couch and then obtained CBCT images. Registration between the planning CT and the CBCT was performed using automatic target registration software, and the registration errors were recorded for each planning CT data set with different slice thickness. The respective average and standard deviation of errors for 10 mm slice thickness CT in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions (n=15 data sets) were: 0.7 +/- 0.2mm, 0.8 +/- 0.2mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2mm for the Penta-Guide phantom; 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm for the acrylic ball phantom; and 0.6 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2 mm for the pelvic phantom. We found that the mean registration errors were always less than 1 mm regardless of the slice thickness tested. The results suggest that there is no obvious correlation between the planning CT slice thickness and the registration errors.We have evaluated relationship between planning CT slice thickness and the accuracy of automatic target registration using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Planning CT images were acquired with reconstructed slice thickness of 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10mm for three different phantoms: Penta-Guide phantom, acrylic ball phantom, and pelvic phantom. After correctly placing the phantom at the isocenter using an in-room laser, we purposely displaced it by moving the treatment couch and then obtained CBCT images. Registration between the planning CT and the CBCT was performed using automatic target registration software, and the registration errors were recorded for each planning CT data set with different slice thickness. The respective average and standard deviation of errors for 10 mm slice thickness CT in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions (n=15 data sets) were: 0.7 +/- 0.2mm, 0.8 +/- 0.2mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2mm for the Penta-Guide phantom; 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm, and 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm for the acrylic ball phantom; and 0.6 +/- 0.2 mm, 0.9 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.2 mm for the pelvic phantom. We found that the mean registration errors were always less than 1 mm regardless of the slice thickness tested. The results suggest that there is no obvious correlation between the planning CT slice thickness and the registration errors.
Author Inoue, Hiroyuki
Oda, Masahiko
Kamikonya, Norihiko
Tanooka, Masao
Sakai, Toshiyuki
Nakagawa, Hideo
Yasumasa, Katsumi
Miura, Hideharu
Hirota, Shozo
Doi, Hiroshi
Sakamoto, Kiyoshi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hiroyuki
  surname: Inoue
  fullname: Inoue, Hiroyuki
  organization: Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Masao
  surname: Tanooka
  fullname: Tanooka, Masao
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hiroshi
  surname: Doi
  fullname: Doi, Hiroshi
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hideharu
  surname: Miura
  fullname: Miura, Hideharu
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hideo
  surname: Nakagawa
  fullname: Nakagawa, Hideo
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Toshiyuki
  surname: Sakai
  fullname: Sakai, Toshiyuki
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Masahiko
  surname: Oda
  fullname: Oda, Masahiko
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Katsumi
  surname: Yasumasa
  fullname: Yasumasa, Katsumi
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Kiyoshi
  surname: Sakamoto
  fullname: Sakamoto, Kiyoshi
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Norihiko
  surname: Kamikonya
  fullname: Kamikonya, Norihiko
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Shozo
  surname: Hirota
  fullname: Hirota, Shozo
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23002477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kL1PwzAQxT0U0VK6MSOPLCn-SJx4RBUflSqxlDlynEtxSexgO0j973FFmU53-t279-4GzayzgNAdJWtKOeOPx-Mwrjld05rN0ILyvMgKXuRztArBNIRIKXlJq2s0Z5wQlpflAv1sh1HpiF2Hx15Za-wBb_Y49EYDjp9Gf1kIATubGsBK68krfTrjaopuUNFoHJU_QMQeDiZEn0aJnsJZ6bzjbNY45Vusk92sATWkA7foqlN9gNWlLtHHy_N-85bt3l-3m6dddqSljJmUbSU0I4JyIgE6qXhHFRRFl8zrljYkLzTrGmg7wZuSFRWVIARpqVBCqpYt0cOf7ujd9wQh1oMJGvoUFdwUakqqJC4rwhN6f0GnZoC2Hr0ZlD_V_79iv9YgbRQ
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.11323/jjmp.31.1_2
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
ExternalDocumentID 23002477
Genre English Abstract
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
F5P
JSF
KQ8
NPM
RJT
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-j179t-99d86c2061309eef9a3f1ae55f477cd1b045c2fbedf63b725819e660d16a69ad2
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISSN 1345-5354
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 23:57:58 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:54:52 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 1
Language Japanese
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-j179t-99d86c2061309eef9a3f1ae55f477cd1b045c2fbedf63b725819e660d16a69ad2
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjmp/31/1/31_2/_article/-char/en
PMID 23002477
PQID 1080619803
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1080619803
pubmed_primary_23002477
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2011
  text: 2011-00-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics
PublicationTitleAlternate Igaku Butsuri
PublicationYear 2011
SSID ssib009993718
ssib011592895
ssj0003314332
ssib058492954
Score 1.5434777
Snippet We have evaluated relationship between planning CT slice thickness and the accuracy of automatic target registration using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Planning CT...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 2
SubjectTerms Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - instrumentation
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods
Tomography, Spiral Computed - instrumentation
Tomography, Spiral Computed - methods
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - instrumentation
Title Impact of planning CT slice thickness on the accuracy of automatic target registration using the on-board cone-beam CT
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23002477
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1080619803
Volume 31
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA7qevDiA1_riwhe47ZN2yQnkcVFDy57WGFvJU9xxe26L_DfO0lb9yQIQikUGkLTyZdvJl9mELrRzmZcmJRIx1ICgMeJiqwkTCouOI2Ui00oNsH6fT4aiUEdcJvXssoGEwNQm1L7GHnHa-GA7POI3k0_ia8a5XdX6xIam6hFgcp4SRcbre1J-MV3jb1AfgT4Fz_2C2uvSJp0aB65KY19Oq_go6UZyWiWNlp5mtDOePwxBR_3Ni6S3_loWJd6e__9on20WzNSfF-Z0AHaGMtDtHoKpydx6fC0LmuEu0MMpFRb7CXy7x4icTmBB4ul1suZ1F_-dblclCENLK5E5tiXfmiS82Ivs38NbcoJUSWYJwaH3BJl5Qd0cIReeg_D7iOpSzSQMczkBRHC8FwnnhREwlonJHWxtFnmUsa0iRUwRp04ZY3LqWJJBgTE5nlk4lzmQprkGG1NoJtThJVRJgr0RPCURporEQsphIyUsdzEbXTdDGMBU8Dva8iJLZfzYj2QbXRS_YtiWuXqKMDDAhbC2NkfWp-jnSpi7K8L1HIAAPYSbevV4m0-uwq2Bff-4PkbSwHVsQ
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+planning+CT+slice+thickness+on+the+accuracy+of+automatic+target+registration+using+the+on-board+cone-beam+CT&rft.jtitle=Igaku+butsuri+%3A+Nihon+Igaku+Butsuri+Gakkai+kikanshi+%3D+Japanese+journal+of+medical+physics+%3A+an+official+journal+of+Japan+Society+of+Medical+Physics&rft.au=Inoue%2C+Hiroyuki&rft.au=Tanooka%2C+Masao&rft.au=Doi%2C+Hiroshi&rft.au=Miura%2C+Hideharu&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.issn=1345-5354&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft_id=info:doi/10.11323%2Fjjmp.31.1_2&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1345-5354&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1345-5354&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1345-5354&client=summon