Managing Paradoxical Tensions in the Implementation of Explainable AI for Product Innovation

This study examines how organizations manage tensions that arise during the implementation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in product innovation. While XAI has advanced technically, its impact on organizational routines, human interpretation of algorithmic outputs, and human-AI dynamics...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:2025 33rd International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE) s. 1 - 6
Hlavní autoři: Amarilli, Fabrizio, Uboldi, Sara, Saraceni, Francesca, Tencati, Lorenzo
Médium: Konferenční příspěvek
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: IEEE 23.07.2025
Témata:
Collaboration
Complexity theory
Digital transformation
Explainable AI
Heuristic algorithms
Navigation
Organizations
paradoxical tensions
product innovation
Standardization
Standards organizations
Technological innovation
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:This study examines how organizations manage tensions that arise during the implementation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in product innovation. While XAI has advanced technically, its impact on organizational routines, human interpretation of algorithmic outputs, and human-AI dynamics remains underexplored. Drawing on a qualitative case study of a global confectionery firm, we analyze the introduction of an XAI solution using participatory action research and paradox theory. We identify four persistent tensions: automation vs. human judgment, transparency vs. complexity, speed vs. accuracy, and standardization vs. customization. Rather than resolving these conflicts, the organization navigated them through both/and strategies that enabled human-AI collaboration. The findings extend paradox theory to XAI-driven innovation and contribute to digital transformation literature by showing how explainability supports knowledge articulation, learning, and adoption. The study also offers practical guidance for designing XAI systems that complement human expertise in complex innovation settings.
DOI:10.1109/WETICE67341.2025.11092074