Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: What are the differences and why do they matter?

This issue comprises the second IRIOP Annual Review Issue, following the incorporation of the International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (IRIOP) into the Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOB). In this editorial, we highlight important differences between narrative, meta-anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of organizational behavior Vol. 35; no. S1; pp. S1 - S5
Main Authors: Hodgkinson, Gerard P., Ford, J. Kevin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2014
Wiley (Variant)
Subjects:
ISSN:0894-3796, 1099-1379
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This issue comprises the second IRIOP Annual Review Issue, following the incorporation of the International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (IRIOP) into the Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOB). In this editorial, we highlight important differences between narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic review techniques and explain how each of these approaches to the reviewing of scholarly work has the potential to contribute to the continuing development of the IRIOP Annual Review Issue, as the leading outlet for the publication of critical, state-of-the-art overviews and commentary on established knowledge and developments at the forefront of the field. In so doing, we clarify further the sorts of contributions we are looking to publish, exemplified by the seven papers appearing in this second issue.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-FP5B6Q9D-1
ArticleID:JOB1918
istex:D2EAE975CCDF2966979516C04AB0850079ED6FDC
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0894-3796
1099-1379
DOI:10.1002/job.1918